06-29-2004
You may need to post your XF86Config file.
And to remove the error XAUTH: (ARGV):1: BAD DISPLAY NAME "FREEBSD.VISABEL:0" IN "REMOVE" COMMAND put the following in youe /etc/hosts file:
127.0.0.1 freebsd.visabel
9 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting
1. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers
I've been trying to configure XFree86, and the first times that I have, it will only run at 320x? resolution.. I have an ATI card, and I've tried using the /stand/sysinstall graphical configuration method, and I've tried xf86config as well, both render the same results. that was before i... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: adn
3 Replies
2. Programming
So where do we post questions about developing for X? Or do we just not do that here? (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: Gekko
2 Replies
3. UNIX Desktop Questions & Answers
Hi folkss...
I just install Freebsd 4.5 mini disk which install only the
core FREEBSD system nothing else. I then want to install
KDE 3.0 so I install XFREE86 4.2 and I installed
both of these programs successfully with
pkg_add "filename.tgz"
I also install wrapper.tgz for "startx"... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: helpme2
1 Replies
4. UNIX Desktop Questions & Answers
Hi folksss..
I will ask similiar to my previous post.
Have anyone successfully install XFree86 ver. 4.2
on FREEBSD 4.5 from scratch ???
If U do, please provide step by step how U do it.
Do U use graphic user interface to setup the hardware
configuration or DOS configuration ?
I... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: helpme2
2 Replies
5. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers
i am currently trying to compile XFree86 under redhat 7.3. i am used to ./configure make make install, but i know that xfree86 is very different. what are the basic steps for building it. i already have read the documentation, but it wasn't of much help. it was erroring out on the imake. i don't... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: choasforages
1 Replies
6. UNIX Desktop Questions & Answers
X.Org just released a new version of their X (X11R6.7). Besides Liscense stuff, what is better about X.org then XFree? What is better about XFree then X.org?
Also: Will my fglrx (ATI) or nvidia drivers (designed for XFree86 4.3) work on X.org? (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: punkrockguy318
2 Replies
7. BSD
hi everybody
i installed FreeBSD 5.x on a box with a video card Diamond SpeedStar A90 and a Fujitsu Siemens Monitor B772-1
when i do "startx" it gives me something like this:
fatal error: no devices detected
no screen detected
i'm lost...i don't know what to... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: hmaiida
3 Replies
8. BSD
Hello,
i have a S3 Trio64V+ card. I installed last release of XFree under FreeBSD
5.4.
I do xf86config, but when i try startx i have this error:
nsinternal# startx
XFree86 Version 4.5.0
Release Date: 16 March 2005
X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0
Build Operating System: FreeBSD... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: jamesf
1 Replies
9. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users
Hello experts,
I installed an old linux distribution and i'm having troubles with the XFree86 server.
The thing is, when i run XF86Setup, X server and windows actually works, because i can get the graphical configuration screen, but when i'm "done" and save the changes to the config file... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: semash!
1 Replies
REMOVE(3) Linux Programmer's Manual REMOVE(3)
NAME
remove - remove a file or directory
SYNOPSIS
#include <stdio.h>
int remove(const char *pathname);
DESCRIPTION
remove() deletes a name from the filesystem. It calls unlink(2) for files, and rmdir(2) for directories.
If the removed name was the last link to a file and no processes have the file open, the file is deleted and the space it was using is made
available for reuse.
If the name was the last link to a file, but any processes still have the file open, the file will remain in existence until the last file
descriptor referring to it is closed.
If the name referred to a symbolic link, the link is removed.
If the name referred to a socket, FIFO, or device, the name is removed, but processes which have the object open may continue to use it.
RETURN VALUE
On success, zero is returned. On error, -1 is returned, and errno is set appropriately.
ERRORS
The errors that occur are those for unlink(2) and rmdir(2).
ATTRIBUTES
For an explanation of the terms used in this section, see attributes(7).
+----------+---------------+---------+
|Interface | Attribute | Value |
+----------+---------------+---------+
|remove() | Thread safety | MT-Safe |
+----------+---------------+---------+
CONFORMING TO
POSIX.1-2001, POSIX.1-2008, C89, C99, 4.3BSD.
BUGS
Infelicities in the protocol underlying NFS can cause the unexpected disappearance of files which are still being used.
SEE ALSO
rm(1), unlink(1), link(2), mknod(2), open(2), rename(2), rmdir(2), unlink(2), mkfifo(3), symlink(7)
COLOPHON
This page is part of release 4.15 of the Linux man-pages project. A description of the project, information about reporting bugs, and the
latest version of this page, can be found at https://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/.
GNU
2017-09-15 REMOVE(3)