Sponsored Content
Special Forums Windows & DOS: Issues & Discussions dualboot not working after installing Solaris Post 302451922 by bongo on Wednesday 8th of September 2010 01:57:44 PM
Old 09-08-2010
dualboot not working after installing Solaris

I have a home pc with dual boot (Grub) with Red Hat as one OS, and Win XP as second OS.
Recently, I removed RedHat with Solaris, but Solaris removed Grub and marked win xp C: partition as logical volume.
I removed Solaris with redHad after that, and I have Grub again... but second OS (win xp) is not working...

what should I do?
someone adviced me to use fixmbr, but i have only one shot to fix it Smilie
 

9 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

AIX-DualBoot on IBM F80

Hey, I want to dualboot AIX 4.3.3 und AIX 5.1 on an ibm F80 server. Preinstalled was 4.3.3 and I installed 5.1 afterwards. After the installation of 5.1 my server always hangs with a 0555 - Message on the LED-display. The manual tells me that this means problems with the filesystems. ... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: mod
3 Replies

2. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

FTP is not working after installing Linux 7.3

hi all, After installing Linux 7.3, when I wasn't be able to FTP to this machine from another machine; however, I do get the reply back when I ping this machine. All I want is able to transfer file on my local machine to this server using FTP comand and it's not working. Could someone please... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: lapnguyen
1 Replies

3. Solaris

Solaris 10 dualboot with Win Xp sp2 ....Plz help !!!!!

Hi All , I am new to solaris & i would like to explore it to taste a flavour of Unix. Before I installed I did a lot of googling as I did not want to play with the data i have on win XP & finally installed Solaris in a dual mode option along with Win XP. These are the steps i... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: codewarrior
1 Replies

4. Red Hat

CentOS and XP dualboot + ext3/ntfs mount

I have WinXP Pro SP2 on first disk /dev/hda, which my BIOS currently has as first boot device. I have CentOS-5.2-x86_64 on second disk /dev/hdb, which I can boot into if I set my BIOS to boot from this HDD. It is using LVM with vg00 and a single LV for root (/) filesystem (ext3). How do I get... (19 Replies)
Discussion started by: apra143
19 Replies

5. Solaris

Executable compiled on solaris 10 not working on solaris 9

Hi I compiled an executable on Solaris 10 which creates semaphore ( semget) but it didn't work on solaris 9 , while it is executing sucessfully on solaris 10. It is throwing the system error that Invalid arguments ( system error 22) on solaris 9. the ldd for the executable on two servers is as... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: ash_bit2k2
4 Replies

6. Solaris

Installing Solaris 8 bootblock without Solaris Install CD

Hello everyone, Background: I'm having an issue with booting a clone of hard drive with Solaris 8 installation. For cloning process I have used g4l, running under click'n'clone option. As far as I know the actual operation ran behind g4l's interface was dd, though I do not have any information... (12 Replies)
Discussion started by: johnny994
12 Replies

7. Linux

About shrinking LVM and then adding the freed space to another OS on dualboot system

Hi all, Fedora 17, 64bit Ubuntu 12.04 desktop 64bit HD 160G I installed Ubuntu 12.04 on the HD first taking up the whole disc. Later I added/installed Fedora 17 selecting the "Shrink" option and save the bootloader on /dev/sda1 to make them dualboot. Installation is successful with... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: satimis
0 Replies

8. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Keys not working after installing redhat santiago

Hi Guys, I have installed redhat santiago on my system but keys ar not working properly after installation , like for | (pipeline) it types "~" and for other special keys also. also man command doesnt work pls help (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: Jcpratap
0 Replies

9. Solaris

Solaris 11.2 / Linux dualboot?

can this be even done, and if yes then what is the safest way to do so? (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: userx-bw
3 Replies
vgremove(1M)															      vgremove(1M)

NAME
vgremove - remove LVM volume group definition from the system SYNOPSIS
vg_name ... Remarks If a combination of volume groups version 1.0 and 2.0 or higher arguments are supplied, then the arguments might not be processed in the order they are listed on the command line. DESCRIPTION
The command removes from the system the last physical volume of the volume group and the definition of the volume group or groups specified by vg_name .... Since all system knowledge of the volume group and its contents are removed, the volume group can no longer be accessed. To move a volume group from one system to another, use the command instead (see vgexport(1M)). Before executing remove all logical volumes residing on the last physical volume by executing (see lvremove(1M)). Before removing a volume group, two steps are necessary: 1. Remove all the logical volumes belonging to the group by using the command (see lvremove(1M)). 2. Remove all but one physical volume belonging to the volume group by using the command (see vgreduce(1M)). If there is any physical volume group created under vg_name ..., the physical volume group information is also removed from file Options and Arguments recognizes the following option and argument: For each volume group removed, also remove its volume group directory and file vg_name The path name of a volume group. EXTERNAL INFLUENCES
Environment Variables determines the language in which messages are displayed. If is not specified or is null, it defaults to "C" (see lang(5)). If any internationalization variable contains an invalid setting, all internationalization variables default to "C" (see environ(5)). EXAMPLES
Remove volume group from the system: SEE ALSO
lvremove(1M), vgchange(1M), vgreduce(1M). vgremove(1M)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:23 PM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy