06-04-2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by
skamal4u
sometime when one drive fails we dont face any issue & we replace the drive with out any problem . but sometimes when one drive fails , system becomes unresponsive and doesnot allow us to login
Why is that so? Definitely the systems you have at large are of different models and architecture.
You must check if there's any firmware bug with with and if your's is updated to the latest.
Slot 0 and slot 1 can be used for the OS disks.you can even RAID slot 0 with 2 or 3. It doesn't really matter as long as you raidctl the correct controller/target
-----Post Update-----
And how do you usually confirm if a drive fails, in a h/w raid?
10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting
1. Shell Programming and Scripting
I need help in awk please help immediatly.
This below function is taking lot of time
Please help me to fine tune it so that it runs faster.
The file count is around 3million records
# Process Body
processbody() {
#set -x
while read line
do
... (18 Replies)
Discussion started by: icefish
18 Replies
2. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers
Hi All,
I'm facing an issue in my awk script.
The script is processing a large text file having the details of a number of persons, each person's details being written from 100 to 250 tags as given below:
100 START|
101klklk|
...
245 opr|
246 55|
250 END|
100 START|
...
245 pp|
246... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: pgp_acc1
4 Replies
3. Programming
Hi,
I have written a program in C and have to test the return value of the functions. So the normal way of doin this wud b
int rc
rc=myfunction(input);
if(rc=TRUE){
}
else{
}
But instead of doing this I have called the function in the if() condition. Does this have any... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: sidmania
2 Replies
4. Solaris
Hi all,
I decided to replace my linux router/firewall with Solaris 11 express. This is a pppoe connection directly to my server...no router boxes. I got everything setup, but the performance is terrible on the NAT....really slow. A web page that loads on the server instantly will take... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: vectox
3 Replies
5. AIX
Hi,
We have GPFS 3.4 Installed on two AIX 6.1 Nodes. We have 3 GPFS Mount points:
/abc01 4TB (Comprises of 14 x 300GB disks from XIV SAN)
/abc02 4TB (Comprises of 14 x 300GB disks from XIV SAN)
/abc03 1TB ((Comprises of Multiple 300GB disks from XIV SAN)
Now these 40... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: aixromeo
1 Replies
6. Solaris
I 'm trying to clone a zfs file system pool/u01 to a new file system called newpool/u01 using following commands
zfs list
zfs snapshot pool/u01@new
zfs send pool/u01@new | zfs -F receive newpool/u01
Its a 100G file system snapshot and copied to same server on different pool and... (9 Replies)
Discussion started by: fugitive
9 Replies
7. Solaris
Hello everyone,
recently we have been experiencing performance issues with chmod. We managed to narrow it down to getcwd.
The following folder exists:
/Folder1/subfol1/subfol2/subfol3
cd /Folder1/subfol1/subfol2/subfol3
truss -D pwd 2>&1 | grep getcwd
0.0001... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: KotekBury
4 Replies
8. AIX
Good Day Everyone,
Just wonder anyone has encounter AIX 6.1 Memory Performance issues ? What I have in my current scenario is we have 3 datastage servers (Segregate server and EE jobs - for those who know Datastage achitect) and 2 db servers(running HA to load balance 4 nodes partitions for... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: ckwan
3 Replies
9. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers
hi guys
right now I have 6 Virtual Machines (VMs) running on Vmware ESXi 5.1 and attached to Storage SAN.
All these run Suse Linux 11 SP1 x64.
All of a sudden 1 of these VMs is running very slow making high CPU usage and I see al wait % kinda high 40-50%. Apparently since I don't own this... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: karlochacon
5 Replies
10. What is on Your Mind?
For years we blocked Baiduspider due to the fact their bots do not obey the robots.txt directive and can really hurt site performance when they unleash 100 bots on the site each pulling pages many times per second.
Last year, I unblocked Baiduspider's IP addresses, and now the problem is back.
... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: Neo
1 Replies
HD(4) Linux Programmer's Manual HD(4)
NAME
hd - MFM/IDE hard disk devices
DESCRIPTION
The hd* devices are block devices to access MFM/IDE hard disk drives in raw mode. The master drive on the primary IDE controller (major
device number 3) is hda; the slave drive is hdb. The master drive of the second controller (major device number 22) is hdc and the slave
hdd.
General IDE block device names have the form hdX, or hdXP, where X is a letter denoting the physical drive, and P is a number denoting the
partition on that physical drive. The first form, hdX, is used to address the whole drive. Partition numbers are assigned in the order
the partitions are discovered, and only non-empty, non-extended partitions get a number. However, partition numbers 1-4 are given to the
four partitions described in the MBR (the `primary' partitions), regardless of whether they are unused or extended. Thus, the first logi-
cal partition will be hdX5. Both DOS-type partitioning and BSD-disklabel partitioning are supported. You can have at most 63 partitions
on an IDE disk.
For example, /dev/hda refers to all of the first IDE drive in the system; and /dev/hdb3 refers to the third DOS `primary' partition on the
second one.
They are typically created by:
mknod -m 660 /dev/hda b 3 0
mknod -m 660 /dev/hda1 b 3 1
mknod -m 660 /dev/hda2 b 3 2
...
mknod -m 660 /dev/hda8 b 3 8
mknod -m 660 /dev/hdb b 3 64
mknod -m 660 /dev/hdb1 b 3 65
mknod -m 660 /dev/hdb2 b 3 66
...
mknod -m 660 /dev/hdb8 b 3 72
chown root:disk /dev/hd*
FILES
/dev/hd*
SEE ALSO
mknod(1), chown(1), mount(8), sd(4)
Linux 1992-12-17 HD(4)