Sponsored Content
Full Discussion: Software RAID on Linux
Operating Systems Linux Software RAID on Linux Post 302282760 by mark54g on Sunday 1st of February 2009 10:22:42 PM
Old 02-01-2009
I don't see how putting them on the same channel will degrade performance to a significant degree. The theoretical limit on SATA is 300MB/s and I have not seen any drives that reliably push more than 90MB/sec on for more than a few minutes at a time. The drives I am going for are lower power 5400-7200rpm variable rotational drives.

As far as the drives themselves, I was going to use a tool WD provides to enable RAID optimized TLER to prevent deep recovery on failed write/read as this could cause a drop on RAID performance (The main difference in their RE series drives).


As for the file systems, I usually break into more than 3, giving /boot, /, /usr, /srv, /home, var and /tmp their own, as well as probably going with a swap partition on the boot drive and a swap file on the array, at least until I get the boot drives mirrored. Then I will not use the swap file any longer and only use the partition on the boot mirror.
I had always planned on LVM for the devices, to aid in the management, or if not LVM, I thought perhaps about using EVMS, but with the reduced support of it, it made me hesitant to try it.
 

9 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. SuSE

Raid software besides Veritass

Hello Lunix people, I am looking for Raid software or solution besides Veritas. Veritas has some great software but are way too costly. Does anyone know of good raid software that but NOT Veritas. I need the funcations but not the cost. (7 Replies)
Discussion started by: xtmeisel
7 Replies

2. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

Software RAID ...

Hi all, I m just trying using software RAID in RHEL 4, without problem , then i wanna simulate if disk 1 is fail (thereis an bootloader), i plug off my 1st disk. My problems is the second disk cannot boot? just stuck in grub, the computer is hang. Sorry for poor concept in RAID? I use a RAID 1.... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: blesets
0 Replies

3. HP-UX

Software RAID (0+1)

Hi! A couple of months ago a disk failed in our JBOD cabinett and I have finally got a new disk to replace it with. It was a RAID 0 so we have to create and configure the whole thing again. First we thought of RAID 1+0 but it seems you can't do this with LVM. If you read my last thread, you can... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: hoff
0 Replies

4. Red Hat

Software RAID doubt

hi friends, I am having issues with adding a spare device to a failed array. I have created RAID 1 with 3 partitions using mdadm command. Later I added a spare with mdadm --add /dev/md0 /dev/sdb6 This works fine and when I check this with mdadm --detail command it just sits there as a spare... (7 Replies)
Discussion started by: saagar
7 Replies

5. Filesystems, Disks and Memory

Software RAID

Hello, My company has inherited a Centos based machine that has 7 hard drives and a software based raid system. Supposedly one of the drives has failed. I need to replace the hardrive. How can I about telling which hard drive needs replacing? I have looked in the logs and there clearly is a... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: mojoman
5 Replies

6. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

RAID software vs hardware RAID

Hi Can someone tell me what are the differences between software and hardware raid ? thx for help. (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: presul
2 Replies

7. Red Hat

Software RAID configuration

We have configured software based RAID5 with LVM on our RHEL5 servers. Please let us know if its good to configure software RAID on live environment servers. What can be the disadvantages of software RAID against hardware RAID (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: mitchnelson
4 Replies

8. Solaris

Software RAID on top of Hardware RAID

Server Model: T5120 with 146G x4 disks. OS: Solaris 10 - installed on c1t0d0. Plan to use software raid (veritas volume mgr) on c1t2d0 disk. After format and label the disk, still not able to detect using vxdiskadm. Question: Should I remove the hardware raid on c1t2d0 first? My... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: KhawHL
4 Replies

9. Solaris

Hardware to software RAID migration

We have hardware RAID configured on our T6320 server and two LDOMs are running on this server. One of our disk got failed and replaced. After replacemnt the newly installed disk not detected by RAID controlled so Oracle suggested to upgrade the REM firmware. As this is the standalone production... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: rock123
0 Replies
XP(4)							     Kernel Interfaces Manual							     XP(4)

NAME
xp - generic SMD moving-head disk SYNOPSIS
/sys/conf/SYSTEM: NXPC xp_controllers # Number of controllers NXPD xp_drives # RM02/03/05, RP04/05/06, # CDC 9766, Fuji 160, etc. BADSECT NO # Bad sector handling (see BUGS) /etc/dtab: #Name Unit# Addr Vector Br Handler(s) # Comments xp ? 176700 254 5 xpintr # xp driver major device number(s): raw: 19 block: 10 minor device encoding: bits 0007 specify partition of XP drive bits 0370 specify XP drive DESCRIPTION
The xp driver is a generic SMD storage module disk driver. It can be adapted to most SMD controllers although bootstrapping will not nec- essarily be directly possible. The drives are numbered from 0 to n on controller 0, from n+1 to m on controller 1, etc. The drives may have different geometries. The xp driver is unique amoungst 2BSD drivers in its numbering of drives. Other drivers (ra for example) number drives 0 thru 7 on con- troller 1, 8 thru 15 on controller 2 and so on. xp on the other hand can have drives 0 and 1 on controller 1, drives 2, 3, 4 and 5 on con- troller 2 and drives 6, 7 and 8 on controller 3. This is different from boot's view of the world, so if you are booting from other than unit 0 you may have to experiment a bit. Files with minor device numbers 0 through 7 refer to various portions of drive 0; minor devices 8 through 15 refer to drive 1, etc. The standard device names begin with ``xp'' followed by the drive number and then a letter a-h for partitions 0-7 respectively. The character ? stands here for a drive number in the range 0-7. The block files access the disk via the system's normal buffering mechanism and may be read and written without regard to physical disk records. There is also a `raw' interface which provides for direct transmission between the disk and the user's read or write buffer. A single read or write call results in exactly one I/O operation and therefore raw I/O is considerably more efficient when many words are transmitted. The names of the raw files conventionally begin with an extra `r.' In raw I/O the buffer must begin on a word (even) boundary, and counts should be a multiple of 512 bytes (a disk sector). Likewise lseek calls should specify a multiple of 512 bytes. DISK SUPPORT
Disks must be labeled using either the standalone disklabel program on the boot tape or with the disklabel(8) program. The kernel no longer attempts to determine the drive type and geometry, instead reading this information from the disklabel. There are no partition tables coded into the xp driver, these must be placed on the drive with disklabel. Special files should only be created for the partitions that are actually used, as the overlap in these addresses could lead to confusion otherwise. Traditionally the xp?a partition is normally used for the root file system, the xp?b partition as a swap area, and the xp?c partition for pack-pack copying (it maps the entire disk). FILES
/dev/xp[0-7][a-h] block files /dev/rxp[0-7][a-h] raw files /dev/MAKEDEV script to create special files /dev/MAKEDEV.local script to localize special files SEE ALSO
hk(4), ra(4), ram(4), rk(4), rl(4), rp(4), rx(4), si(4), dtab(5), autoconfig(8), newfs(8) DIAGNOSTICS
xp%d%c: hard error sn%d cs2=%b er1=%b. An unrecoverable error occurred during transfer of the specified sector of the specified disk par- tition. The contents of the two error registers are also printed in octal and symbolically with bits decoded. The error was either unre- coverable, or a large number of retry attempts (including offset positioning and drive recalibration) could not recover the error. xp%d: write locked. The write protect switch was set on the drive when a write was attempted. The write operation is not recoverable. xp%d%c: soft ecc sn%d. A recoverable ECC error occurred on the specified sector of the specified disk partition. This happens normally a few times a week. If it happens more frequently than this the sectors where the errors are occurring should be checked to see if certain cylinders on the pack, spots on the carriage of the drive or heads are indicated. xp%d: unknown device type 0%o. The number in the drive's drive type register is unknown to the xp driver. BUGS
In raw I/O read and write(2) truncate file offsets to 512-byte block boundaries, and write scribbles on the tail of incomplete blocks. Thus, in programs that are likely to access raw devices, read, write and lseek(2) should always deal in 512-byte multiples. DEC-standard error logging should be supported. The kernel uses partition 'h' to access the badblock information. This should have been 'c' except that almost all of the /etc/disktab entries (and thus existing systems) use 'h' for this purpose. Unless you are very careful with disklabel|(8) (to make certain that no data partition overlaps the badblock area) you should probably leave BADSECT undefined in the kernel config file. 3rd Berkeley Distribution August 14, 1995 XP(4)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:21 PM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy