Sponsored Content
Top Forums UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users Naming conventions for shared libraries in Linux Post 302259642 by neked on Tuesday 18th of November 2008 02:49:00 PM
Old 11-18-2008
Naming conventions for shared libraries in Linux

Hello,

I'm wondering what is the naming conventions for *.so shared libraries in linux. For example, a library in /lib, say libcrypt-2.7.so has a symbolic link called libcrypt.so.1 pointing to it, yet libncursesw.so.5.6 has a symbolic link called libncursesw.so.5 pointing to it. What is the relationship between the numbers in the symbolic links and the actual targets?
 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Programming

Shared libraries

Hello everybody, I am having major problems at the moment with shared libraries and I have to little knowledge of them to solve them. So please, please help me :) Ok this is the problem: I have a library A, which uses B and C, and C uses again D. If I try to run A as plugin in apache,... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: Micky
0 Replies

2. Programming

shared libraries

I am compiling code which produces .a and .la libraries. How can I produce .so libraries? I know that gcc -shared does but how? (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: thalex
2 Replies

3. Linux

Shared Libraries

How do i make a library shared say i have a library a.so which i have just compiled. I want to make it shared how do i make it Next Queation is what is the difference between a.so.0 a.so.1 a.so.2 & a.so :rolleyes: (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: wojtyla
1 Replies

4. Programming

how to view loaded shared libraries by running processes in linux

anybody knows how to view loaded shared libraries by running processes in linux enviornment? any command or tool ? thanks a lot (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: princelinux
3 Replies

5. UNIX Desktop Questions & Answers

Naming convention for Libraries..

Hi All, I need to know standard naming convention for Unix libraries (including all flavours of unix)..As I have gone through some sites and found out The UNIX convention for naming of libraries is lib<name>.so.<major>.<minor>.<revision> so is it statndard . also does it change... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: rkshukla14
0 Replies

6. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

static and shared libraries

can someone explain whether my understanding is correct lets suppose we have a program that uses library x. if x is static then the code of x will be part of our program, so if we're going to have 5 executables of our program, then each executable will have x as part of it. Also, x does not... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: JamesByars
2 Replies

7. Solaris

A query on Disk naming conventions in Solaris.

These are findings by me with my little experience with Solaris 10. Please correct me if wrong.. In x86 systems with ide hard disk: c= controller d=disk s=slice 1.Here controller c0 means the primary ide controller ide0. controller c1 means the secondary ide controller ide1. ... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: saagar
5 Replies

8. Solaris

Iscsi shared disk - same naming across server

Hi all, Is there anyway i can control the naming of the disk device ? I have added an iscsi disk on server1 using iscsiadm , devfsadm and it is now showing as /dev/dsk/c2t0d0 in node1 However, i am worried that the same disk will appear as /dev/dsk/cXtXd0 in node2 This iscsi disk(lun)... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: javanoob
0 Replies

9. Programming

C/C++ shared libraries on Linux.

This is the first time that I created a dynamic library in linux and although the program works, I do not get the correct information about the library when executing ldd. I explain the details: 1) Source code: bye_fn.c: #include <stdio.h> #include "hello.h" void bye (const char*... (9 Replies)
Discussion started by: jose_spain
9 Replies

10. Cybersecurity

Proper naming conventions

Hey guys, not sure should I post it here or in 'What is on Your Mind?' I'm discussing usage of DSL (domain specific language) in security tools with my colleagues. We haven't been able to reach an agreement over naming conventions. There are many tools using DSL: splunk, sumologic,... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: Tobby P
2 Replies
LN(1)							      General Commands Manual							     LN(1)

NAME
ln - make links SYNOPSIS
ln [ -s ] sourcename [ targetname ] ln [ -s ] sourcename1 sourcename2 [ sourcename3 ... ] targetdirectory DESCRIPTION
A link is a directory entry referring to a file; the same file (together with its size, all its protection information, etc.) may have several links to it. There are two kinds of links: hard links and symbolic links. By default ln makes hard links. A hard link to a file is indistinguishable from the original directory entry; any changes to a file are effective independent of the name used to reference the file. Hard links may not span file systems and may not refer to directories. The -s option causes ln to create symbolic links. A symbolic link contains the name of the file to which it is linked. The referenced file is used when an open(2) operation is performed on the link. A stat(2) on a symbolic link will return the linked-to file; an lstat(2) must be done to obtain information about the link. The readlink(2) call may be used to read the contents of a symbolic link. Symbolic links may span file systems and may refer to directories. Given one or two arguments, ln creates a link to an existing file sourcename. If targetname is given, the link has that name; targetname may also be a directory in which to place the link; otherwise it is placed in the current directory. If only the directory is specified, the link will be made to the last component of sourcename. Given more than two arguments, ln makes links in targetdirectory to all the named source files. The links made will have the same name as the files being linked to. SEE ALSO
rm(1), cp(1), mv(1), link(2), readlink(2), stat(2), symlink(2) 4th Berkeley Distribution April 10, 1986 LN(1)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:59 AM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy