Sponsored Content
Full Discussion: ps: no controlling terminal
Top Forums Shell Programming and Scripting ps: no controlling terminal Post 302153692 by porter on Wednesday 26th of December 2007 06:21:33 AM
Old 12-26-2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by sriram003
ps: no controlling terminal
You are going to hate this answer, but it means that process running "ps" has no controlling terminal.

An interactive session has a controlling terminal that is used to deliver Ctrl-C, hangups and basic job control among other things.

Background tasks should not really be associated with a controlling terminal because they are not interactive.
 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

connecting to unix through hyper terminal - as a dumb terminal

I just changed from windows NT to XP and I am no longer able to connect to my unix system. I used to use hyper terminal -- which acts as dumb terminal to my main frame unix system. I think one of the options used to be "direct to comX". This option isn't listed now. I use a serial port and the... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: michelle
2 Replies

2. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Controlling logfiles

I support an app that outputs alert and audit messages to one log file (vendor says they can't be separated). The script that I have written takes a copy (mv cmd) of the file to do the separation and reformatting. I have a problem that I loose records (messages are being written constantly, upto 3+... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: nhatch
5 Replies

3. Programming

controlling terminal

What is controlling terminal in the case of daemon process? (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: Madhu Babu
2 Replies

4. Filesystems, Disks and Memory

Controlling I/O

Hi guys, Can anyone please tell me how I can control the I/O on my hardware devices in Suse Linux 8.1. I find that everytime I am reading a CD, or copying from a CD, I am unable to listen to music of watch a movie. Maybe this is intended to be like so, for the current high street technolgy... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: bionicfysh
1 Replies

5. Programming

Controlling child processes

Hello all, I am trying to create n child processes and control them from a parent process; say make child 3 print its pid and then child 5 do the same and some other stuff. Is there a way to accomplishing this after all the child processes are created via a call to fork(). Thank you, FG (23 Replies)
Discussion started by: forumGuy
23 Replies

6. Shell Programming and Scripting

ksh script as a login shell return "no controlling terminal"

I have created a ksh shell script and used it as a login shell for a user. </etc/passwd> lramirev:x:111:200:Luis:/export/home/menush:/usr/local/menush/menush My shell script is like this: </usr/local/menush/menush> #!/bin/ksh # if ] then . $HOME/.profile fi ... (8 Replies)
Discussion started by: lramirev
8 Replies

7. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

A terminal controlling a terminal...

Hi all... Consider me a dummy here... I do not want any code or for anyone to show me how to do it at this time, but here is the question:- I have had this brainstorm to be able to control the AudioScope.sh program in the "Shell Scripting And Programming" forum... Is it possible, by... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: wisecracker
4 Replies

8. Red Hat

"rhgb quiet" controlling the display of commands in single user mode ?"rhgb quiet" controlling the d

Why does removing "rhgb quiet" from the kernel boot parameters control whether or not the commands I enter are displayed in single user mode ? For instance, if I do not remove "rhgb quiet", when I am in single user mode, whatever command I type will not be displayed on the screen. The... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: Hijanoqu
0 Replies

9. Shell Programming and Scripting

Cannot get terminal application to launch with a graphical launcher when successful in terminal

I have been having an extremely annoying problem. For the record, I am relatively new at this. I've only been working with unix-based OS's for roughly two years, mostly Xubuntu and some Kali. I am pretty familiar with the BASH language, as that's the default shell for debian. Now, I've made this... (16 Replies)
Discussion started by: Huitzilopochtli
16 Replies

10. Shell Programming and Scripting

Print Terminal Output Exactly how it Appears in the Terminal to a New Text File

Hello All, I have a text file containing output from a command that contains lots of escape/control characters that when viewed using vi or view, looks like jibberish. But when viewed using the cat command the output is formatted properly. Is there any way to take the output from the cat... (7 Replies)
Discussion started by: mrm5102
7 Replies
nohup(1)							   User Commands							  nohup(1)

NAME
nohup - run a command immune to hangups SYNOPSIS
/usr/bin/nohup command [argument]... /usr/bin/nohup -p [-Fa] pid [pid]... /usr/bin/nohup -g [-Fa] gpid [gpid]... /usr/xpg4/bin/nohup command [argument]... DESCRIPTION
The nohup utility invokes the named command with the arguments supplied. When the command is invoked, nohup arranges for the SIGHUP signal to be ignored by the process. When invoked with the -p or -g flags, nohup arranges for processes already running as identified by a list of process IDs or a list of process group IDs to become immune to hangups. The nohup utility can be used when it is known that command takes a long time to run and the user wants to log out of the terminal. When a shell exits, the system sends its children SIGHUP signals, which by default cause them to be killed. All stopped, running, and background jobs ignores SIGHUP and continue running, if their invocation is preceded by the nohup command or if the process programmatically has cho- sen to ignore SIGHUP. /usr/bin/nohup Processes run by /usr/bin/nohup are immune to SIGHUP (hangup) and SIGQUIT (quit) signals. /usr/bin/nohup -p [-Fa] Processes specified by ID are made immune to SIGHUP and SIGQUIT, and all output to the controlling terminal is redirected to nohup.out. If -F is specified, nohup forces control of each process. If -a is specified, nohup changes the signal disposition of SIGHUP and SIGQUIT even if the process has installed a handler for either sig- nal. /usr/bin/nohup -g [-Fa] Every process in the same process group as the processes specified by ID are made immune to SIGHUP and SIGQUIT, and all output to the controlling terminal is redirected to nohup.out. If -F is specified, nohup forces control of each process. If -a is specified, nohup changes the signal disposition of SIGHUP and SIGQUIT even if the process has installed a handler for either signal. /usr/xpg4/bin/nohup Processes run by /usr/xpg4/bin/nohup are immune to SIGHUP. The nohup utility does not arrange to make processes immune to a SIGTERM (terminate) signal, so unless they arrange to be immune to SIGTERM or the shell makes them immune to SIGTERM, they will receive it. If nohup.out is not writable in the current directory, output is redirected to $HOME/nohup.out. If a file is created, the file has read and write permission (600. See chmod(1). If the standard error is a terminal, it is redirected to the standard output, otherwise it is not redirected. The priority of the process run by nohup is not altered. OPTIONS
The following options are supported: -a Always changes the signal disposition of target processes. This option is valid only when specified with -p or -g. -F Force. Grabs the target processes even if another process has control. This option is valid only when specified with -p or -g. -g Operates on a list of process groups. This option is not valid with -p. -p Operates on a list of processes. This option is not valid with -g. OPERANDS
The following operands are supported: pid A decimal process ID to be manipulated by nohup -p. pgid A decimal process group ID to be manipulated by nohup -g. command The name of a command that is to be invoked. If the command operand names any of the special shell_builtins(1) utilities, the results are undefined. argument Any string to be supplied as an argument when invoking the command operand. USAGE
Caution should be exercised when using the -F flag. Imposing two controlling processes on one victim process can lead to chaos. Safety is assured only if the primary controlling process, typically a debugger, has stopped the victim process and the primary controlling process is doing nothing at the moment of application of the proc tool in question. EXAMPLES
Example 1 Applying nohup to pipelines or command lists It is frequently desirable to apply nohup to pipelines or lists of commands. This can be done only by placing pipelines and command lists in a single file, called a shell script. One can then issue: example$ nohup sh file and the nohup applies to everything in file. If the shell script file is to be executed often, then the need to type sh can be eliminated by giving file execute permission. Add an ampersand and the contents of file are run in the background with interrupts also ignored (see sh(1)): example$ nohup file & Example 2 Applying nohup -p to a process example$ long_running_command & example$ nohup -p `pgrep long_running_command` Example 3 Applying nohup -g to a process group example$ make & example$ ps -o sid -p $$ SID 81079 example$ nohup -g `pgrep -s 81079 make` ENVIRONMENT VARIABLES
See environ(5) for descriptions of the following environment variables that affect the execution of nohup: LANG, LC_ALL, LC_CTYPE, LC_MES- SAGES, PATH, NLSPATH, and PATH. HOME Determine the path name of the user's home directory: if the output file nohup.out cannot be created in the current directory, the nohup command uses the directory named by HOME to create the file. EXIT STATUS
The following exit values are returned: 126 command was found but could not be invoked. 127 An error occurred in nohup, or command could not be found Otherwise, the exit values of nohup are those of the command operand. FILES
nohup.out The output file of the nohup execution if standard output is a terminal and if the current directory is writable. $HOME/nohup.out The output file of the nohup execution if standard output is a terminal and if the current directory is not writable. ATTRIBUTES
See attributes(5) for descriptions of the following attributes: /usr/bin/nohup +-----------------------------+-----------------------------+ | ATTRIBUTE TYPE | ATTRIBUTE VALUE | +-----------------------------+-----------------------------+ |Availability |SUNWcsu | +-----------------------------+-----------------------------+ |CSI |Enabled | +-----------------------------+-----------------------------+ /usr/xpg4/bin/nohup +-----------------------------+-----------------------------+ | ATTRIBUTE TYPE | ATTRIBUTE VALUE | +-----------------------------+-----------------------------+ |Availability |SUNWxcu4 | +-----------------------------+-----------------------------+ |CSI |Enabled | +-----------------------------+-----------------------------+ |Interface Stability |Standard | +-----------------------------+-----------------------------+ SEE ALSO
batch(1), chmod(1), csh(1), ksh(1), nice(1), pgrep(1), proc(1), ps(1), sh(1), shell_builtins(1), signal(3C), proc(4), attributes(5), envi- ron(5), standards(5) WARNINGS
If you are running the Korn shell (ksh(1)) as your login shell, and have nohup'ed jobs running when you attempt to log out, you are warned with the message: You have jobs running. You need to log out a second time to actually log out. However, your background jobs continues to run. NOTES
The C-shell (csh(1)) has a built-in command nohup that provides immunity from SIGHUP, but does not redirect output to nohup.out. Commands executed with `&' are automatically immune to HUP signals while in the background. nohup does not recognize command sequences. In the case of the following command, example$ nohup command1; command2 the nohup utility applies only to command1. The command, example$ nohup (command1; command2) is syntactically incorrect. SunOS 5.11 19 Jun 2006 nohup(1)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:14 AM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy