Sponsored Content
Operating Systems Solaris Disks atached to a Symbios 53C875, canīt see them. Post 302071309 by reborg on Friday 14th of April 2006 10:44:23 AM
Old 04-14-2006
Just to clarify...E450 backplanes each support 4 or 8 disks, and up to three can be installed in a system if 4 disk backplanes are used.

The dirvers for that particualr chip is the GLM, and you should check that both dirvers and any applicable pathces are installed, go to sunsolve.sun.com to find the details.
 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

how many disks do I have?

Hi How do I check how many disks do I have in Solaris & HP-UX? Also what does this mean c9t1d5 in /dev/dsk what is c, t, d etc cheers (8 Replies)
Discussion started by: g-e-n-o
8 Replies

2. Shell Programming and Scripting

atached file mail

How atached file mail to user for exemplo file with gzip xxx.gz? ex: shell script: mailx -s "TEST SHELL" manoeldba@yahoo.com < $file <send content file> how send file xxx.gz to user? (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: manoelmarcos
2 Replies

3. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

fedora disks

How can I see what partitions are laid out on the disk and what free space there is ( unpartitioned) I think the existing partitions are taking up about 50% but i cant seem to find where it will show me that unused space. how do i tell how big the disk is in the system? Thanks again for... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: BG_JrAdmin
2 Replies

4. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Disks on AIX

Hello I've been working on AIX 5.3 ML3 on IBM pSeries520. That server has 6 HDD drives in 3 volume groups (1+mirror in each group). I must check which phisical disk is which disk in the system. For ex. I want to know that disk in 4th slot in the machine is marked as hdisk5 on AIX. Does anybody... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: piooooter
2 Replies

5. Solaris

Disks compatibility

Hi all, I am trying to isntall veritas replicator on 2 DA 3000 storage , But with little luck . I am running a solaris 10 and vsf 4.1, Veritas Volume Replicator Option 4.1 My question is that : when i got the array i had 2 disks missing , So we had to replace them , but I found out that... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: ppass
0 Replies

6. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

Volumizing the disks

I got new disks for existing server. Can anyone help me to volumize it to 1gb and 64gb and mount it on the server? Thanks in advance. (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: vadlamudi
1 Replies

7. Solaris

Re-using disks

I would like to know if I can move the disks from a V240 chassis into a V440 chassis to use the increased resources (CPU & Memory) to boost performance. I know you can move disks between V210/240 chassis's, but I'm not sure if this would work between 240s & 440s. Any help would be much appreciated. (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: Chains
4 Replies

8. Solaris

Atached storage to v890 --- very slow

Hello Experts, I have a StorEdge 3320 attached to V890, the problem is that I am copying data from v890's internal hdds to 3320's hdds, it is taking a-lot of time, the transfer is very slow. while I have checked the transfer from V890's internal hdd to another machines it is good. So, its mean... (15 Replies)
Discussion started by: bluetooth
15 Replies

9. Solaris

Broken Disks (?)

Hello Folks, Iīm a New Unix admin (by forceps) and I got a warning from one server saying: Solaris Volume Manager: hostnamehere: metacheck: Report: Mon May 14 18:45:00 BRT 2012 -------------------------------------------------------------- metacheck: metadb problem, for more detail run: ... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: pxb368@motorola
2 Replies

10. Solaris

How to tell what disks are used for a zpool?

Hello, Does anyone know how I can tell what disk are being not being used by a zpool? For example in Veritas Volume manager, I can run a "vxdisk list" and disks that are marked as "online invalid" are disk that are not used. I'm looking for a similar command in ZFS which will easily show... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: robertinoau
5 Replies
bup-fsck(1)						      General Commands Manual						       bup-fsck(1)

NAME
bup-fsck - verify or repair a bup repository SYNOPSIS
bup fsck [-r] [-g] [-v] [--quick] [-j jobs] [--par2-ok] [--disable-par2] [filenames...] DESCRIPTION
bup fsck is a tool for validating bup repositories in the same way that git fsck validates git repositories. It can also generate and/or use "recovery blocks" using the par2(1) tool (if you have it installed). This allows you to recover from dam- aged blocks covering up to 5% of your .pack files. In a normal backup system, damaged blocks are less important, because there tends to be enough data duplicated between backup sets that a single damaged backup set is non-critical. In a deduplicating backup system like bup, however, no block is ever stored more than once, even if it is used in every single backup. If that block were to be unrecoverable, all your backup sets would be damaged at once. Thus, it's important to be able to verify the integrity of your backups and recover from disk errors if they occur. WARNING: bup fsck's recovery features are not available unless you have the free par2(1) package installed on your bup server. WARNING: bup fsck obviously cannot recover from a complete disk failure. If your backups are important, you need to carefully consider redundancy (such as using RAID for multi-disk redundancy, or making off-site backups for site redundancy). OPTIONS
-r, --repair attempt to repair any damaged packs using existing recovery blocks. (Requires par2(1).) -g, --generate generate recovery blocks for any packs that don't already have them. (Requires par2(1).) -v, --verbose increase verbosity (can be used more than once). --quick don't run a full git verify-pack on each pack file; instead just check the final checksum. This can cause a significant speedup with no obvious decrease in reliability. However, you may want to avoid this option if you're paranoid. Has no effect on packs that already have recovery information. -j, --jobs=numjobs maximum number of pack verifications to run at a time. The optimal value for this option depends how fast your CPU can verify packs vs. your disk throughput. If you run too many jobs at once, your disk will get saturated by seeking back and forth between files and performance will actually decrease, even if numjobs is less than the number of CPU cores on your system. You can experiment with this option to find the optimal value. --par2-ok immediately return 0 if par2(1) is installed and working, or 1 otherwise. Do not actually check anything. --disable-par2 pretend that par2(1) is not installed, and ignore all recovery blocks. EXAMPLE
# generate recovery blocks for all packs that don't # have them bup fsck -g # generate recovery blocks for a particular pack bup fsck -g ~/.bup/objects/pack/153a1420cb1c8*.pack # check all packs for correctness (can be very slow!) bup fsck # check all packs for correctness and recover any # damaged ones bup fsck -r # check a particular pack for correctness and recover # it if damaged bup fsck -r ~/.bup/objects/pack/153a1420cb1c8*.pack # check if recovery blocks are available on this system if bup fsck --par2-ok; then echo "par2 is ok" fi SEE ALSO
bup-damage(1), fsck(1), git-fsck(1) BUP
Part of the bup(1) suite. AUTHORS
Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@gmail.com>. Bup unknown- bup-fsck(1)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:24 PM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy