ultra 10 boot warning---corrupt label


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Operating Systems Solaris ultra 10 boot warning---corrupt label
# 8  
Old 07-28-2008
I found the problem. The second HD which was configured previously with another filesystem, I created a newfs and the WARNING is now remove.

Case closed!
Login or Register to Ask a Question

Previous Thread | Next Thread

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Solaris

Sun Ultra 30 boot problems

Hi all, I've just replaced the eprom battery on my Sun Ultra-30 and having boot issues. For some reason its trying to boot off the network instead of the DISK1. Howe can I change it so the open boot does not default to the boot device: NET Thanks, Rob (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: robbo007
3 Replies

2. Solaris

Ultra 45 Boot Loop

I am trying to get an old Ultra 45 to boot and it is stuck in a loop. I cannot get anything to come up on a monitor, so when I hook up a serial connection to the TTYa interface I see the following output: @(#)OBP 4.21.2 2005/12/22 17:17 Sun Ultra 45 Workstation Clearing TLBs Loading... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: Madrox72
0 Replies

3. Emergency UNIX and Linux Support

Ubuntu filesystem error corrupt GPT label

Need help/advice urgently.:wall: I really shot myself in the foot this time. Here is the scenario Have a Solaris server Solaris 10 x86 Update 8. Installed an LSI MegaRaid 9280 raid controller and attached a 16 bay JBOD box to it, created a RAID6 virtual drive with 1 hot spare. Created a... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: ccj4467
2 Replies

4. Filesystems, Disks and Memory

Original SAN to a New Solaris Server: Corrupt Label

I've seen several posts that are similar to what I'm trying to do but no dice. I have a server (SunFire V215) that went belly up. I've set up a new one. I'm getting a corrupt label: wrong magic number error. Everything I'm seeing says label the drives, but if I do I'm afraid I'll lose the data... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: tnelson
0 Replies

5. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

Linux on vmware won't boot due to corrupt library file!

We have an issue here: The libc.so.6 file (link) is corrupted and it causes the system unbootable. It even doesn't boot to single user mode. How can we boot the system to fix the library file? Or is there any other solutions for this issue? Here are some boot messages:... (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: aixlover
6 Replies

6. Solaris

corrupt label - wrong magic number

I have created 1 LUN. 1)LUN 00BB 200GB /dev/rdsk/c1t3d44 /dev/rdsk/c2t28d44 /dev/rdsk/c3t19d44 /dev/rdsk/c4t12d44 2) Already added the new entry into sd.conf and rebooted. 3) Already done these: powercf –q power config 4) power display dev=all I can see the new Symmetrix device.... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: sirius20d
1 Replies

7. Solaris

Corrupt label bad geometry

Hi, I have a Sun X4200, when I try to reboot the machine it's not detecting the drive and it shows the following error when I try to rebuilt it. I am not sure whether its a bad HD or something else. Label says 983040 blocks: Drive says 983039 blocks WARNING:... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: gunnervarma
1 Replies

8. Solaris

Warning: No Disk Label

Hi Fellows, I am trying to mirror 2 identical disks on a SUN Ultra 10 machines (with new installation of Solaris 8). In the process, I found 2 issues: 1. prtvtoc /dev/rdsk/c0t0d0s0 | fmthard -s - /dev/rdsk/c0t1d0s0 Result: Disk partitions between the 2 disks do not match up. 2. manually... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: o51974
2 Replies

9. Solaris

Ultra 60 won't boot

I just was given an Ultra 60 that I'm trying to get started so that I can re-load the system with Solaris 10. I can't seem to get the system to boot past the initial memory check. I've tried to do an Stop-A to get to the eeprom, but can't do that. My next step is to try to send a break from the... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: zosojohnny
0 Replies

10. Linux

Help! Boot failure - corrupt superblock

Hi everyone, OK, I've made a monumental fsck-up of my linux installation AND I did not backup my data properly (idiot!), so I'm really up the proverbial without a paddle here. Basically the problem is I re-sized my /home partition (hda13) using Partition Magic 8.0, after doing so my mandrake... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: alarmcall
0 Replies
Login or Register to Ask a Question
PCIBACK(4)						 BSD/xen Kernel Interfaces Manual						PCIBACK(4)

NAME
pciback -- Xen backend paravirtualized PCI pass-through driver SYNOPSIS
pciback* at pci? DESCRIPTION
The pciback driver is the backend part of the PCI pass-through functionality that can be used by the Xen dom0 to export pci(4) devices to a guest domain. To export a PCI device to a guest domain, the device has to be attached to pciback in the dom0. When the guest domain is NetBSD, the device attached to the pciback driver will attach to a xpci(4) bus inside the guest domain. EXAMPLES
To attach a device to the pciback driver, follow these steps: 1. look for the device PCI ID, via pcictl(8). 2. edit boot.cfg(5) and add the PCI ID to the list of PCI IDs that you want to attach to pciback, in bus:device.function notation. The list is passed to dom0 module via the pciback.hide parameter: pciback.hide=(bus:dev.fun)(bus:dev.func)(...) See also boot(8). 3. reboot dom0. 4. add the PCI ID to the list of PCI devices in the domain configuration file: pci = ['bus:dev.fun', '...'] 5. start the guest domain. SEE ALSO
pci(4), xpci(4), boot(8), pcictl(8) HISTORY
The pciback driver first appeared in NetBSD 5.1. AUTHORS
The pciback driver was written by Manuel Bouyer <bouyer@NetBSD.org>. CAVEATS
Currently, to attach a device to the pciback backend, this procedure has to be performed at boot(8) time. In the future, it will be possible to do it without requiring a dom0 reboot. SECURITY CONSIDERATIONS
As PCI passthrough offers the possibility for guest domains to send arbitrary PCI commands to a physical device, this has direct impact on the overall stability and security of the system. For example, in case of erroneous or malicious commands, the device could overwrite physi- cal memory portions, via DMA. BSD
January 8, 2011 BSD