07-20-2004
Yes, yes. I was just looking at that. I just needed confirmation. Thanks, Zazzy.
10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting
1. Programming
Hi,
I have problem detecting my tape drive.
In SAM, once I click on the either Automated Backups or Interactive Backup and Recovery icon, the screen will prompt searching for device and ..... nothing appears in the list.
In the end, I have the kill the SAM process and reboot the system and... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: jennifer
1 Replies
2. SCO
i have a sco-unix box. I want to access tape driver (sdt-700) on scsi. but i dont know how? where is this device file for tape driver is located? how do i access this tape? pls help this fool. (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: mchitrakar
1 Replies
3. Solaris
I have a level 3 (weekly) ufsdump on a DLT 4700 that is only 239MB in total for the 3 weeks that the tape is loaded. On the 4th week, I remove the tape and insert another tape to do a level 0 (monthly) dump.
Question is: What is the command to append more level 3 dumps if I reinsert the... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: antalexi
3 Replies
4. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users
Hi,
1- how can I find my tape device on my server ?
2-I have a backup of a data base distributed on several file system. How using tar -x can I extract from tape to each apropriate file system ? For exemple the data base was on /d1 ; /d2 ; and /d3. Now I cd to which /dn and use tar -xvf /dev/nm0... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: big123456
0 Replies
5. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers
I disconected external device which was configured as rmt0. When I connect it again and run cfgmgr device name has changed (internal drive which was rmt1 is now rmt0 and external drive was rmt0 and is rmt1) and I dont know how to back it out. The thing is that for all backups I use new modell... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: fraydey
2 Replies
6. Solaris
hi, was wondering if there is a problem with the patches, and if we wish to restore everything back to square one, how should we go about using ufsrestore from a DAT tape of ufsdump backup data ? (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: Exposure
1 Replies
7. Solaris
hi friends, i am trying to patch a solaris 9 server. However i need to do a ufsdump backup before any patching. There is no hardware port for connecting the tape drive. Any other ways to do a ufsdump ? :wall: (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: Exposure
2 Replies
8. AIX
Hi All,
After (by accident) closing a session that ran a restore command I can not access the tape drive anymore.
I get the following error:
# tctl -f /dev/rmt0 rewind
/dev/rmt0: Resource temporarily unavailable
But I cannot find any processes associated with the tape device:
# ps... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: petervg
2 Replies
9. AIX
Hi all
The situation is as follows:
We need to take an mksysb image from an AIX 6.1 server. From some reason (irrelevant to this discussion) this server does not have access to a local CD-ROM or a tape drive. We do have another server with AIX 6.1 (but different technology level) which got access... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: abohmeed
1 Replies
10. HP-UX
Hi,
Unable to make tape backup, please help.
/opt/ignite/bin/make_tape_recovery -a /dev/rmt/?mn -I -v -m tar -x inc_entire=vg00
* Creating local directories for configuration files and archive.
======= 04/25/16 16:28:08 IST Started /opt/ignite/bin/make_tape_recovery.
(Mon... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: anuragr
4 Replies
RMF(1) [nmh-1.5] RMF(1)
NAME
rmf - remove an nmh folder
SYNOPSIS
rmf [+folder] [-interactive | -nointeractive] [-version] [-help]
DESCRIPTION
Rmf removes all of the messages (files) within the specified (or default) folder, and then removes the folder (directory) itself.
If there are any files within the folder which are not a part of nmh, they will not be removed, and an error will be produced. If the
folder is given explicitly or the -nointeractive option is given, then the folder will be removed without confirmation. Otherwise, the
user will be asked for confirmation. If rmf can't find the current folder, for some reason, the folder to be removed defaults to `+inbox'
(unless overridden by user's profile entry "Inbox") with confirmation.
If the folder being removed is a subfolder, the parent folder will become the new current folder, and rmf will produce a message telling
the user this has happened. This provides an easy mechanism for selecting a set of messages, operating on the list, then removing the list
and returning to the current folder from which the list was extracted.
If rmf s used on a read-only folder, it will delete all the (private) sequences (i.e., "atr-seq-folder" entries) for this folder from your
context without affecting the folder itself.
Rmf irreversibly deletes messages that don't have other links, so use it with caution.
FILES
$HOME/.mh_profile The user profile
PROFILE COMPONENTS
Path: To determine the user's nmh directory
Current-Folder: To find the default current folder
Inbox: To find the default inbox
SEE ALSO
rmm(1)
DEFAULTS
`+folder' defaults to the current folder, usually with confirmation
`-interactive' if +folder' not given, `-nointeractive' otherwise
CONTEXT
Rmf will set the current folder to the parent folder if a subfolder is removed; or if the current folder is removed, it will make "inbox"
current. Otherwise, it doesn't change the current folder or message.
BUGS
Although intuitively one would suspect that rmf works recursively, it does not. Hence if you have a sub-folder within a folder, in order
to rmf the parent, you must first rmf each of the children.
MH.6.8 11 June 2012 RMF(1)