Sponsored Content
Full Discussion: Control Panel seeking.
Top Forums UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers Control Panel seeking. Post 34818 by norsk hedensk on Thursday 13th of March 2003 04:19:37 PM
Old 03-13-2003
well it is always better to do things by hand from the command line, but if you want to be lazy then you can use webmin --> www.webmin.com
its actually a great program, but dont think that you will be able to avoid doing things from the command line, and after learning how to do that you might end up hating things like webmin because it takes away your control from the actually configuration. i dont mean it will do it wrong, i mean that with tools like these it is often happens that it might generate bad configuration files and what have you.... remember its always better to do it from the command line.
 

2 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Filesystems, Disks and Memory

OS X / fsck / apps dont work no control panel

Alright. My neighbor kid brings me his iBook and says nothing works. He decided to move the file system to his likeness and that semed to create the problems. Now he doesn't have access rights to his home. I have run fsck over and over again and I keep getting ** fs modified ** I have also... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: maxwell
0 Replies

2. Shell Programming and Scripting

I need to make a control panel for a Linux script

has anyone got experience using jsch? Does it give me a prompt when I run a command/ print result back to me. I need to send commands to a linux database like restart,shutdown,stop database caching etc. But in java I want to build a GUI I can use. TO call database commands. and do these... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: Samuel12
3 Replies
URI::URL(3)						User Contributed Perl Documentation					       URI::URL(3)

NAME
URI::URL - Uniform Resource Locators SYNOPSIS
$u1 = URI::URL->new($str, $base); $u2 = $u1->abs; DESCRIPTION
This module is provided for backwards compatibility with modules that depend on the interface provided by the "URI::URL" class that used to be distributed with the libwww-perl library. The following differences exist compared to the "URI" class interface: o The URI::URL module exports the url() function as an alternate constructor interface. o The constructor takes an optional $base argument. The "URI::URL" class is a subclass of "URI::WithBase". o The URI::URL->newlocal class method is the same as URI::file->new_abs. o URI::URL::strict(1) o $url->print_on method o $url->crack method o $url->full_path: same as ($uri->abs_path || "/") o $url->netloc: same as $uri->authority o $url->epath, $url->equery: same as $uri->path, $uri->query o $url->path and $url->query pass unescaped strings. o $url->path_components: same as $uri->path_segments (if you don't consider path segment parameters) o $url->params and $url->eparams methods o $url->base method. See URI::WithBase. o $url->abs and $url->rel have an optional $base argument. See URI::WithBase. o $url->frag: same as $uri->fragment o $url->keywords: same as $uri->query_keywords o $url->localpath and friends map to $uri->file. o $url->address and $url->encoded822addr: same as $uri->to for mailto URI o $url->groupart method for news URI o $url->article: same as $uri->message SEE ALSO
URI, URI::WithBase COPYRIGHT
Copyright 1998-2000 Gisle Aas. perl v5.12.1 2008-04-04 URI::URL(3)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:12 PM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy