Sponsored Content
Special Forums Hardware Xenomai On ARM board EXYNOS 4210 ODROID-PC Post 302661907 by Corona688 on Tuesday 26th of June 2012 12:38:56 AM
Old 06-26-2012
Try taking a look at what they patched to make it work on that board.
 

7 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Linux

Kernel internals for ARM

Hi, Does anybody have a good pointer on Linux kernel internals for ARM architecture? I can locate plenty for x86 but since ARM is RISC I think there would be subtle changes. So if somebody has a knowledge of good document on Linux Kernel internals for ARM or even a comparative study of kernel on... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: Rakesh Ranjan
0 Replies

2. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

Problem in read() system call in Xenomai-2.4

Dear All, I am having problem with read() system call in Blocking Mode. In my driver interrupt intimation done through RT FIFO. so i have created the RT FIFO and open the FIFO using open() system call with O_RDONLY flag and i am waiting for interrupt using read() blocking call.initally... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: rajamohan
1 Replies

3. Programming

When a process is down - how to get a coredump in arm board?

Running a multi-threaded program in my arm board one day or more ,The process down . In order to get a coredump to analysis of the stack , . I use commands ulimited -c unlimited . but when the process down . no coredump But I write a test #include <stdio.h> int main(void){ ... (14 Replies)
Discussion started by: aobai
14 Replies

4. Fedora

gcc arm compiler

think only compile is required I wish to compile a sample code int main() { int a=5,b=8,c; c=a+b; } compile using gcc -Wall -g -march=arm922t main.c -o hello I got an error :bad value(arm922t) for -march=switch instead of using march i used mcpu options ,the same... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: sujith4u87
1 Replies

5. Programming

gcc for arm process

hi, correct me if am wrong, as per gcc doc gcc is able to compile code for different target systems such as ARM, ARC etc. I tried for compiling ARM but failed to do so. getting below error: gcc -mcpu=arm920t -c avg.c -o agv_arm `-mcpu=' is deprecated. Use `-mtune=' or '-march=' instead.... (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: zing_foru
6 Replies

6. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

Trace "free(): invalid next size (normal)" error on arm-linux board

Hi guys, i'm running a program on samsumg 6410 arm cpu board. it caused an "free(): invalid next size (normal)" fail. i try to use gdb for remote debugging: 1, start gdb server on board: gdbserver 192.168.1.20:1234 ./HostAP Process ./HostAP created; pid = 499 Listening on port... (8 Replies)
Discussion started by: ss1969
8 Replies

7. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

setserial not working on linux running on Beagleboard (ARM development board)

Hi, I'm trying to develop an application to work with serial infra-red module, but I'm having difficulties to even get my module started. My HW is Beagleboard, which has 1 UART serial port, normally used for console, which I have disabled (I re-created the boot.scr, without the console... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: julumme
0 Replies
DPATCH.MAKE(7)							      dpatch							    DPATCH.MAKE(7)

NAME
dpatch.make - simplistic wrapper around dpatch(1) for make(1). SYNOPSIS
include /usr/share/dpatch/dpatch.make DESCRIPTION
For backwards compatibility and ease of use, dpatch.make is provided along with dpatch(1). Its purpose is to implement generic patch and unpatch rules that can be reused in debian/rules scripts. WARNING
dpatch is deprecated, please switch to the `3.0 (quilt)' Debian source package format instead. See http://wiki.debian.org/Projects/Deb- Src3.0#FAQ for a short guide on how to do it. USAGE
Using dpatch.make is rather straightforward: one has to include the file in debian/rules, change the appropriate targets to depend on patch and unpatch, and that is all it takes. Figuring out what the appropriate target is, requires some thought. Generally, one has a build target, or config.status, or configure (or any of these with a -stamp suffix). Most of the time these are called first during the build, so one of these (the one that exists, and is not depended upon by another one) has to be modified to depend on the patch target in dpatch.make. Doing the same for the clean target is easier. One only has to rename the old rule to, say, clean-patched, then make a new one that has clean-patched and unpatch in its list of prerequisites. CUSTOMISATION
There are a few variables which are used by dpatch.make, which can be set before including it, in order to change the systems behaviour a little. These variables are: DEB_SOURCE_PACKAGE This is the name of the source package, used when creating the stamp file. By default, it is empty. DPATCH_STAMPDIR This is the directory where stamp files will be put. Default is debian/patched. DPATCH_STAMPFN The name of the stamp file, which contains the patch descriptions and other possible meta-data. Default value is patch-stamp. DPATCH_PREDEPS A list of make targets to call before applying the dpatch. DPATCH_WORKDIR The target directory to apply patches to. By default, it is the current directory. PATCHLIST The list of patches to apply. This is an alternative to debian/patches/00list - that is, if this variable is not empty, the contents of 00list will be ignored, and this variable will be used instead. EXAMPLE
include /usr/share/dpatch/dpatch.make build: build-stamp build-stamp: patch-stamp ${MAKE} touch build-stamp clean: clean1 unpatch clean1: ${MAKE} clean rm -rf debian/files debian/substvars debian/imaginary-package .PHONY: patch unpatch ... . . . SIDE EFFECTS
Using dpatch.make instead of calling dpatch directly has one side effect: it will create a file called patch-stamp containing some meta-information extracted from the scriptlets. Depending on a phony patch target directly from build target may cause build target to be reevaluated even when there is no change to be done. Instead, try making build-stamp depend on patch-stamp as specified in this example. AUTHOR
Originally by Gergely Nagy. Modified by Junichi Uekawa. SEE ALSO
dpatch(1), dpatch(7), dpatch-edit-patch(1), dpatch-list-patch(1), dpatch-convert-diffgz(1) DPATCH 2 Dec 13 2011 DPATCH.MAKE(7)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:35 AM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy