Sponsored Content
Top Forums UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers system calls and atomic operation Post 302514883 by jim mcnamara on Monday 18th of April 2011 10:38:05 AM
Old 04-18-2011
1. No.
2. yes.

There is more to this, but that answers what you asked.
 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

System Calls

What does the system call "dup" do? What is the difference between dup and dup2 I have a fair idea of what it does but I am confused when its coming down to the exact details... Please help me!:confused: (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: clickonline1
2 Replies

2. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

System calls for cp and mv

Which system calls are made for operations cp and mv (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: gaurava99
2 Replies

3. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

System calls?

open, creat, read, write, lseek and close Are they all primitive? :confused: *Another Question: is there a different between a system call, and an i/o system call? (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: PlunderBunny
2 Replies

4. Solaris

System calls ?

where can i find the differences in System calls between solaris and aix? also is it possible to find a comprehensive list of them? (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: TECHRAMESH
1 Replies

5. Shell Programming and Scripting

Using System calls without compilation

Hi... I would like to create a program that can be easily ported between several Linuxes... Therefore I would like to avoid compilation and have the ability to run it as shell scripts runs... My program need to call some system calls such as fork etc... do you know a way to use them without... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: yamsin789
1 Replies

6. UNIX Desktop Questions & Answers

Using system calls

Hi, I'm new to UNIX system calls. Can someone share your knowledge as to how exactly system calls should be executed? Can they be typed like commands such as mkdir on the terminal itself? Also, are there any websites which will show me an example of the output to expect when a system call like... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: ilavenil
1 Replies

7. Programming

System calls

why user is not able to switch from user to kernel mode by writing the function whose code is identical to system call. (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: joshighanshyam
1 Replies

8. BSD

system calls

what is the functions and relationship between fork,exec,wait system calls as i am a beginer just want the fundamentals. (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: sangramdas
1 Replies

9. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

About system calls.

Hi all, I am new here . I want to know about system call in detail. As system calls are also function .How system identifies it.:) (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: vishwasrao
2 Replies

10. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

system calls in C

Hello, how would i be able to call ps in C programming? thanks, ---------- Post updated at 01:39 AM ---------- Previous update was at 01:31 AM ---------- here's the complete system call, ps -o pid -p %d, getpit() (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: l flipboi l
2 Replies
stdatomic(3)						   BSD Library Functions Manual 					      stdatomic(3)

NAME
ATOMIC_VAR_INIT, atomic_init, atomic_load, atomic_store, atomic_exchange, atomic_compare_exchange_strong, atomic_compare_exchange_weak, atomic_fetch_add, atomic_fetch_and, atomic_fetch_or, atomic_fetch_sub, atomic_fetch_xor, atomic_is_lock_free -- type-generic atomic opera- tions SYNOPSIS
#include <stdatomic.h> _Atomic(T) v = ATOMIC_VAR_INIT(c); _Atomic T v = ATOMIC_VAR_INIT(c); void atomic_init(_Atomic(T) *object, T value); T atomic_load(_Atomic(T) *object); T atomic_load_explicit(_Atomic(T) *object, memory_order order); void atomic_store(_Atomic(T) *object, T desired); void atomic_store_explicit(_Atomic(T) *object, T desired, memory_order order); T atomic_exchange(_Atomic(T) *object, T desired); T atomic_exchange_explicit(_Atomic(T) *object, T desired, memory_order order); _Bool atomic_compare_exchange_strong(_Atomic(T) *object, T *expected, T desired); _Bool atomic_compare_exchange_strong_explicit(_Atomic(T) *object, T *expected, T desired, memory_order success, memory_order failure); _Bool atomic_compare_exchange_weak(_Atomic(T) *object, T *expected, T desired); _Bool atomic_compare_exchange_weak_explicit(_Atomic(T) *object, T *expected, T desired, memory_order success, memory_order failure); T atomic_fetch_add(_Atomic(T) *object, T operand); T atomic_fetch_add_explicit(_Atomic(T) *object, T operand, memory_order order); T atomic_fetch_and(_Atomic(T) *object, T operand); T atomic_fetch_and_explicit(_Atomic(T) *object, T operand, memory_order order); T atomic_fetch_or(_Atomic(T) *object, T operand); T atomic_fetch_or_explicit(_Atomic(T) *object, T operand, memory_order order); T atomic_fetch_sub(_Atomic(T) *object, T operand); T atomic_fetch_sub_explicit(_Atomic(T) *object, T operand, memory_order order); T atomic_fetch_xor(_Atomic(T) *object, T operand); T atomic_fetch_xor_explicit(_Atomic(T) *object, T operand, memory_order order); _Bool atomic_is_lock_free(const _Atomic(T) *object); DESCRIPTION
The header <stdatomic.h> provides type-generic operations on atomic operations. Atomic variables are declared using the _Atomic() type specifier or the _Atomic type qualifier. Such variables are not type-compatible with their non-atomic counterparts and may have different alignment. Operations on atomic variables that do not use the atomic_() interfaces, including compound assignment operations, will behave as if the non-_explicit() versions of those interfaces had been used. The atomic_init() operation initializes the atomic variable object with value. Atomic variables can be initialized while being declared using ATOMIC_VAR_INIT(). The atomic_load() operation returns the value of atomic variable object. The atomic_store() operation sets the atomic variable object to the desired value. The atomic_exchange() operation combines the behaviour of atomic_load() and atomic_store(). It sets the atomic variable object to the desired value and returns the original contents of the atomic variable. The atomic_compare_exchange_strong() operation stores the desired value into atomic variable object, but only if the atomic variable is equal to the expected value. Upon success, the operation returns true. Upon failure, the expected value is overwritten with the contents of the atomic variable and false is returned. The atomic_compare_exchange_weak() operation is identical to atomic_compare_exchange_strong(), but is allowed to fail even if atomic variable object is equal to the expected value. When an atomic_compare_exchange() operation is in a loop, the weak version will yield better perfor- mance on some platforms. When atomic_compare_exchange_weak() would require a loop and atomic_compare_exchange_strong() would not, the strong version is preferable. The atomic_fetch_add() operation adds the value operand to atomic variable object and returns the original contents of the atomic variable. The atomic_fetch_and() operation applies the and operator to atomic variable object and value operand and stores the result into object, while returning the original contents of the atomic variable. The atomic_fetch_or() operation applies the or operator to atomic variable object and value operand and stores the result into object, while returning the original contents of the atomic variable. The atomic_fetch_sub() operation subtracts the value operand from atomic variable object and returns the original contents of the atomic variable. The atomic_fetch_xor() operation applies the xor operator to atomic variable object and value operand and stores the result into object, while returning the original contents of the atomic variable. The atomic_is_lock_free() operation returns whether atomic variable object uses locks to implement atomic operations. MEMORY ORDER
C11 defines a memory model that may allow for the reordering of operations in the absence of fences or explicit memory ordering operations. The non-_explicit() interfaces use the strictest available memory order: sequential consistency. The _explicit() interfaces allow for config- uration of the memory order operation which is present. The types of available memory order operations are explained in more detail in ISO/IEC 9899:2011 (``ISO C11''). The order parameter of the _explicit() interfaces can have one of the following values: memory_order_relaxed Operation does not order memory. memory_order_consume Performs a consume operation. memory_order_acquire Performs an acquire operation. memory_order_release Performs a release operation. memory_order_acq_rel Performs both an acquire and a release operation. memory_order_seq_cst Provides sequential consistency. SEE ALSO
atomic(3), pthread(3) STANDARDS
These interfaces conform to ISO/IEC 9899:2011 (``ISO C11''). BSD
December 27, 2011 BSD
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:01 PM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy