Sponsored Content
Top Forums Shell Programming and Scripting merge files with same row values Post 302449813 by vgersh99 on Tuesday 31st of August 2010 03:51:54 PM
Old 08-31-2010
Code:
nawk '{idx=$1 SUBSEP $2} FNR==NR{f2[idx]=$3;next} {print $0 (idx in f2)? OFS f2[idx]:""}' file2 file1

 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Shell Programming and Scripting

How to insert data befor some field in a row of data depending up on values in row

Hi I need to do some thing like "find and insert before that " in a file which contains many records. This will be clear with the following example. The original data record should be some thing like this 60119827 RTMS_LOCATION_CDR INSTANT_POSITION_QUERY 1236574686123083rtmssrv7 ... (8 Replies)
Discussion started by: aemunathan
8 Replies

2. Shell Programming and Scripting

awk command : row by row merging of two files

I want to write a scrpit to merge files row wise (actually concatinating) main.txt X Y Z file 1 A B C file 2 1 2 3 now i want the script to check if the file1 is empty or not, if empty then make it like A B C 1 2 3 again to check if second file is empty if not do as done... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: shashi792
0 Replies

3. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Merge all csv files in one folder considering only 1 header row and ignoring header of all others

Friends, I need help with the following in UNIX. Merge all csv files in one folder considering only 1 header row and ignoring header of all other files. FYI - All files are in same format and contains same headers. Thank you (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: Shiny_Roy
4 Replies

4. Shell Programming and Scripting

How to merge multiple rows into single row if first column matches ?

Hi, Can anyone suggest quick way to get desired output? Sample input file content: A 12 9 A -0.3 2.3 B 1.0 -4 C 34 1000 C -111 900 C 99 0.09 Output required: A 12 9 -0.3 2.3 B 1.0 -4 C 34 1000 -111 900 99 0.09 Thanks (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: cbm_000
3 Replies

5. Shell Programming and Scripting

How to merge two files with unique values matching.?

I have one script as below: #!/bin/ksh Outputfile1="/home/OutputFile1.xls" Outputfile2="/home/OutputFile2.xls" InputFile1="/home/InputFile1.sql" InputFile2="/home/InputFile2.sql" echo "Select hobby, class, subject, sports, rollNumber from Student_Table" >> InputFile1 echo "Select rollNumber... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: Sharma331
3 Replies

6. Shell Programming and Scripting

Help with merge data at same column but different row inquiry

Hi, Anyone did experience to merge data at same column but different row previously by using awk, sed, perl, etc? Input File: SSO12256 SSO0001 thiD-1 rbsK-1 SSO0006 SSO0007 SSO0008 SSO0009 SSO0010 SSO0011 Desired Output File: (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: perl_beginner
5 Replies

7. Shell Programming and Scripting

Help with merge row if share same column info

Input file: 32568 SSO7483 32568 SSO7486 117231 SSO1293 117231 SSO1772 178081 SSO3076 178081 SSO3077 222417 porA-2 222417 porB-2 263778 SSO1245 263778 SSO0509 . . Desired output: 32568 SSO7483,SSO7486 117231 ... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: perl_beginner
3 Replies

8. Shell Programming and Scripting

Merge row based on replicates ID

Dear All, I was wondering if you may help me with an issue. I would like to merge row based on column 1. input file: b1 ggg b2 fff NA NA hhh NA NA NA NA NA a1 xxx a2 yyy NA NA zzz NA NA NA NA NA a1 xxx NA NA a3 ttt NA ggg NA NA NA NA output file: b1 ggg b2 fff NA NA hhh NA NA NA NA NA... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: giuliangiuseppe
5 Replies

9. Shell Programming and Scripting

Comparing same column from two files, printing whole row with matching values

First I'd like to apologize if I opened a thread which is already open somewhere. I did a bit of searching but could quite find what I was looking for, so I will try to explaing what I need. I'm writing a script on our server, got to a point where I have two files with results. Example: File1... (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: mitabrev83
6 Replies

10. UNIX for Beginners Questions & Answers

Merge 4 bim files by keeping only the overlapping variants (unique rs values )

Dear community, I am facing a problem and I kindly ask your help: I have 4 different data sets consisted from 3 different types of array. On each file, column 1 is chromosome position, column 2 is SNP id etc... Lets say I have the following (bim) datasets: x2014: 1 rs3094315... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: fondan
4 Replies
GIT-MERGE-BASE(1)						    Git Manual							 GIT-MERGE-BASE(1)

NAME
git-merge-base - Find as good common ancestors as possible for a merge SYNOPSIS
git merge-base [-a|--all] <commit> <commit>... git merge-base [-a|--all] --octopus <commit>... git merge-base --is-ancestor <commit> <commit> git merge-base --independent <commit>... DESCRIPTION
git merge-base finds best common ancestor(s) between two commits to use in a three-way merge. One common ancestor is better than another common ancestor if the latter is an ancestor of the former. A common ancestor that does not have any better common ancestor is a best common ancestor, i.e. a merge base. Note that there can be more than one merge base for a pair of commits. OPERATION MODE
As the most common special case, specifying only two commits on the command line means computing the merge base between the given two commits. More generally, among the two commits to compute the merge base from, one is specified by the first commit argument on the command line; the other commit is a (possibly hypothetical) commit that is a merge across all the remaining commits on the command line. As a consequence, the merge base is not necessarily contained in each of the commit arguments if more than two commits are specified. This is different from git-show-branch(1) when used with the --merge-base option. --octopus Compute the best common ancestors of all supplied commits, in preparation for an n-way merge. This mimics the behavior of git show-branch --merge-base. --independent Instead of printing merge bases, print a minimal subset of the supplied commits with the same ancestors. In other words, among the commits given, list those which cannot be reached from any other. This mimics the behavior of git show-branch --independent. --is-ancestor Check if the first <commit> is an ancestor of the second <commit>, and exit with status 0 if true, or with status 1 if not. Errors are signaled by a non-zero status that is not 1. OPTIONS
-a, --all Output all merge bases for the commits, instead of just one. DISCUSSION
Given two commits A and B, git merge-base A B will output a commit which is reachable from both A and B through the parent relationship. For example, with this topology: o---o---o---B / ---o---1---o---o---o---A the merge base between A and B is 1. Given three commits A, B and C, git merge-base A B C will compute the merge base between A and a hypothetical commit M, which is a merge between B and C. For example, with this topology: o---o---o---o---C / / o---o---o---B / / ---2---1---o---o---o---A the result of git merge-base A B C is 1. This is because the equivalent topology with a merge commit M between B and C is: o---o---o---o---o / / o---o---o---o---M / / ---2---1---o---o---o---A and the result of git merge-base A M is 1. Commit 2 is also a common ancestor between A and M, but 1 is a better common ancestor, because 2 is an ancestor of 1. Hence, 2 is not a merge base. The result of git merge-base --octopus A B C is 2, because 2 is the best common ancestor of all commits. When the history involves criss-cross merges, there can be more than one best common ancestor for two commits. For example, with this topology: ---1---o---A / X / ---2---o---o---B both 1 and 2 are merge-bases of A and B. Neither one is better than the other (both are best merge bases). When the --all option is not given, it is unspecified which best one is output. A common idiom to check "fast-forward-ness" between two commits A and B is (or at least used to be) to compute the merge base between A and B, and check if it is the same as A, in which case, A is an ancestor of B. You will see this idiom used often in older scripts. A=$(git rev-parse --verify A) if test "$A" = "$(git merge-base A B)" then ... A is an ancestor of B ... fi In modern git, you can say this in a more direct way: if git merge-base --is-ancestor A B then ... A is an ancestor of B ... fi instead. SEE ALSO
git-rev-list(1), git-show-branch(1), git-merge(1) GIT
Part of the git(1) suite Git 1.8.5.3 01/14/2014 GIT-MERGE-BASE(1)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:49 PM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy