Sponsored Content
Full Discussion: Link aggregation
Operating Systems Solaris Link aggregation Post 302377166 by PatrickBaer on Thursday 3rd of December 2009 09:20:03 AM
Old 12-03-2009
obelix:/# ifconfig -a
lo0: flags=2001000849<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4,VIRTUAL> mtu 8232 index 1
inet 127.0.0.1 netmask ff000000
aggr1: flags=1000843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4> mtu 1500 index 2
inet 192.168.17.8 netmask ffff0000 broadcast 192.168.255.255
ether 0:30:48:8a:c6:ee
obelix:/# dladm show-aggr
Schlüssel: 1 (0x0001) Richtlinie: L4 Adresse: 0:30:48:8a:c6:ee (Auto)
Gerät Adresse Geschwindigkeit Duplex Link Status
e1000g0 0:30:48:8a:c6:ee 1000 Mbps full up attached
e1000g1 0:30:48:8a:c6:ef 1000 Mbps full up attached
obelix:/# netstat -rn

Routing Table: IPv4
Destination Gateway Flags Ref Use Interface
-------------------- -------------------- ----- ----- ---------- ---------
default 192.168.17.1 UG 1 0
192.168.0.0 192.168.17.8 U 1 11 aggr1
224.0.0.0 192.168.17.8 U 1 0 aggr1
127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 4 76 lo0
obelix:/#


Yes, they are up. I ran an rsync for several hours and checked the statistics for both interfaces:

obelix:/# !375
dladm show-dev --statistics
ipackets rbytes ierrors opackets obytes oerrors
e1000g0 783204 55453484 0 20321 4288909 0
e1000g1 68599 8120481 0 7719021 10998514776 0

See the difference?
 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Solaris

Link Aggregation

Hi there I have a requirement to provide failover to our customer boxes in case of interface / switch failure, I have been looking at Solaris Link Aggregation with LACP and I wanted to ask a question Ive seen multiple websites that say the following Does this also mean that if the... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: hcclnoodles
2 Replies

2. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

Link Aggregation and LACP

Hi there I have a requirement to provide failover to our customer boxes in case of interface / switch failure, I have been looking at Solaris Link Aggregation with LACP and I wanted to ask a question Ive seen multiple websites that say the following Does this also mean that if the... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: hcclnoodles
1 Replies

3. Solaris

Difference between IPMP and Link Aggregation ?

Hi everybody, One client asked me to configure network failover and load balancing for two Ethernet interfaces, I tried IPMP but I was unable to do so, because he's using his Gateway as firewall and PING is disabled. so IPMP kept telling me that all interfaces failed because gateway can't be... (8 Replies)
Discussion started by: Sun Fire
8 Replies

4. IP Networking

bonding without switch link aggregation

I have some linux machines that I am trying to increase the throughput to on a single connection. They connect to a switch with two 1GbE lines and the switch does not have Link Aggregation support for these machines. I have tried bonding with balance-rr, balance-alb, but the machines can only... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: Eruditass
4 Replies

5. AIX

Link aggregation with hacmp ?

Hi, I need to setup a hacmp cluster (my first one, we usually use VCS on AIX), but I require more network bandwith than a normal gigabit etherchannel setup can provide, so I am thinking about using linkaggregation - 2 active adapters to one switch and a single backup adapter to another switch... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: zxmaus
4 Replies

6. HP-UX

Link Aggregation HPUX

Hi, Hoping someone can offer some advice on something i have not dealt with before. We have a server that seems to have some very strange configuration done on it. It has 2 physical NIC's and rather than both be aggregated into LAN900 we have 1 in LAN900 and 1 in LAN901? (See Below)... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: Andyp2704
2 Replies

7. HP-UX

Break Link Aggregation in HP UX.

Hi, I want to Break the Link Aggregation. My aggregation are lan0+lan1 = lan900. Now I want to break this and put the IP in lan0. But i have cluster environment and this is the main database server. So It need to change in cluster script. But I dont know where I have to change it. Please... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: mkiron
1 Replies

8. Solaris

Link Aggregation without LACP

Hi, I'm not from the Solaris world and some of these things are new to me. Can someone tell me if it is possible to configure link aggregation without using LACP? I am told etherchannel was setup without LACP. (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: techy1
3 Replies

9. IP Networking

Link Aggregation

Hi ihave three link of internet and iwant to put one linux front of a firewall that this three linux speard firewall such az load balance and fialover but dont close any port and protocol and only firewall have been internet what way can i use for it ? are there any script and services do that... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: mnnn
0 Replies

10. Solaris

How can I test link aggregation?

Hi, I have Solaris-10 server and link aggregation is configured on this in below way # dladm show-aggr key: 1 (0x0001) policy: L4 address: 3c:d9:2b:ee:a8:a (auto) device address speed duplex link state bnx1 3c:d9:2b:ee:a8:a... (8 Replies)
Discussion started by: solaris_1977
8 Replies
GRE(4)							   BSD Kernel Interfaces Manual 						    GRE(4)

NAME
gre -- encapsulating network device SYNOPSIS
To compile the driver into the kernel, place the following line in the kernel configuration file: device gre Alternatively, to load the driver as a module at boot time, place the following line in loader.conf(5): if_gre_load="YES" DESCRIPTION
The gre network interface pseudo device encapsulates datagrams into IP. These encapsulated datagrams are routed to a destination host, where they are decapsulated and further routed to their final destination. The ``tunnel'' appears to the inner datagrams as one hop. gre interfaces are dynamically created and destroyed with the ifconfig(8) create and destroy subcommands. This driver corresponds to RFC 2784. Encapsulated datagrams are prepended an outer datagram and a GRE header. The GRE header specifies the type of the encapsulated datagram and thus allows for tunneling other protocols than IP. GRE mode is also the default tunnel mode on Cisco routers. gre also supports Cisco WCCP protocol, both version 1 and version 2. The gre interfaces support a number of additional parameters to the ifconfig(8): grekey Set the GRE key used for outgoing packets. A value of 0 disables the key option. enable_csum Enables checksum calculation for outgoing packets. enable_seq Enables use of sequence number field in the GRE header for outgoing packets. EXAMPLES
192.168.1.* --- Router A -------tunnel-------- Router B --- 192.168.2.* / / +------ the Internet ------+ Assuming router A has the (external) IP address A and the internal address 192.168.1.1, while router B has external address B and internal address 192.168.2.1, the following commands will configure the tunnel: On router A: ifconfig greN create ifconfig greN inet 192.168.1.1 192.168.2.1 ifconfig greN inet tunnel A B route add -net 192.168.2 -netmask 255.255.255.0 192.168.2.1 On router B: ifconfig greN create ifconfig greN inet 192.168.2.1 192.168.1.1 ifconfig greN inet tunnel B A route add -net 192.168.1 -netmask 255.255.255.0 192.168.1.1 NOTES
The MTU of gre interfaces is set to 1476 by default, to match the value used by Cisco routers. This may not be an optimal value, depending on the link between the two tunnel endpoints. It can be adjusted via ifconfig(8). For correct operation, the gre device needs a route to the decapsulating host that does not run over the tunnel, as this would be a loop. The kernel must be set to forward datagrams by setting the net.inet.ip.forwarding sysctl(8) variable to non-zero. SEE ALSO
gif(4), inet(4), ip(4), me(4), netintro(4), protocols(5), ifconfig(8), sysctl(8) A description of GRE encapsulation can be found in RFC 2784 and RFC 2890. AUTHORS
Andrey V. Elsukov <ae@FreeBSD.org> Heiko W.Rupp <hwr@pilhuhn.de> BUGS
The current implementation uses the key only for outgoing packets. Incoming packets with a different key or without a key will be treated as if they would belong to this interface. The sequence number field also used only for outgoing packets. BSD
November 7, 2014 BSD
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:40 AM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy