12-02-2009
ok ok, I probably haven't expressed it clearly enough:
I have set up two interfaces with link aggregation and they work just fine!
But: When I start an rsync process or scp or whatever similar, it only uses one physical interface. So what I am looking for is a way, to distribute traffic from a single process, e.g. rsync, to both interfaces.
10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting
1. Solaris
Hi there
I have a requirement to provide failover to our customer boxes in case of interface / switch failure, I have been looking at Solaris Link Aggregation with LACP and I wanted to ask a question
Ive seen multiple websites that say the following
Does this also mean that if the... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: hcclnoodles
2 Replies
2. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users
Hi there
I have a requirement to provide failover to our customer boxes in case of interface / switch failure, I have been looking at Solaris Link Aggregation with LACP and I wanted to ask a question
Ive seen multiple websites that say the following
Does this also mean that if the... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: hcclnoodles
1 Replies
3. Solaris
Hi everybody,
One client asked me to configure network failover and load balancing for two Ethernet interfaces, I tried IPMP but I was unable to do so, because he's using his Gateway as firewall and PING is disabled.
so IPMP kept telling me that all interfaces failed because gateway can't be... (8 Replies)
Discussion started by: Sun Fire
8 Replies
4. IP Networking
I have some linux machines that I am trying to increase the throughput to on a single connection. They connect to a switch with two 1GbE lines and the switch does not have Link Aggregation support for these machines. I have tried bonding with balance-rr, balance-alb, but the machines can only... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: Eruditass
4 Replies
5. AIX
Hi,
I need to setup a hacmp cluster (my first one, we usually use VCS on AIX), but I require more network bandwith than a normal gigabit etherchannel setup can provide, so I am thinking about using linkaggregation - 2 active adapters to one switch and a single backup adapter to another switch... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: zxmaus
4 Replies
6. HP-UX
Hi,
Hoping someone can offer some advice on something i have not dealt with before.
We have a server that seems to have some very strange configuration done on it. It has 2 physical NIC's and rather than both be aggregated into LAN900 we have 1 in LAN900 and 1 in LAN901? (See Below)... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: Andyp2704
2 Replies
7. HP-UX
Hi,
I want to Break the Link Aggregation. My aggregation are lan0+lan1 = lan900.
Now I want to break this and put the IP in lan0. But i have cluster environment and this is the main database server.
So It need to change in cluster script.
But I dont know where I have to change it.
Please... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: mkiron
1 Replies
8. Solaris
Hi,
I'm not from the Solaris world and some of these things are new to me. Can someone tell me if it is possible to configure link aggregation without using LACP?
I am told etherchannel was setup without LACP. (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: techy1
3 Replies
9. IP Networking
Hi
ihave three link of internet and iwant to put one linux front of a firewall that this three linux speard firewall such az load balance and fialover but dont close any port and protocol and only firewall have been internet what way can i use for it ?
are there any script and services do that... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: mnnn
0 Replies
10. Solaris
Hi,
I have Solaris-10 server and link aggregation is configured on this in below way
# dladm show-aggr
key: 1 (0x0001) policy: L4 address: 3c:d9:2b:ee:a8:a (auto)
device address speed duplex link state
bnx1 3c:d9:2b:ee:a8:a... (8 Replies)
Discussion started by: solaris_1977
8 Replies
LEARN ABOUT OPENSOLARIS
rsync_selinux
rsync_selinux(8) rsync Selinux Policy documentation rsync_selinux(8)
NAME
rsync_selinux - Security Enhanced Linux Policy for the rsync daemon
DESCRIPTION
Security-Enhanced Linux secures the rsync server via flexible mandatory access control.
FILE_CONTEXTS
SELinux requires files to have an extended attribute to define the file type. Policy governs the access daemons have to these files. If
you want to share files using the rsync daemon, you must label the files and directories public_content_t. So if you created a special
directory /var/rsync, you would need to label the directory with the chcon tool.
chcon -t public_content_t /var/rsync
To make this change permanent (survive a relabel), use the semanage command to add the change to file context configuration:
semanage fcontext -a -t public_content_t "/var/rsync(/.*)?"
This command adds the following entry to /etc/selinux/POLICYTYPE/contexts/files/file_contexts.local:
/var/rsync(/.*)? system_u:object_r:publix_content_t:s0
Run the restorecon command to apply the changes:
restorecon -R -v /var/rsync/
SHARING FILES
If you want to share files with multiple domains (Apache, FTP, rsync, Samba), you can set a file context of public_content_t and pub-
lic_content_rw_t. These context allow any of the above domains to read the content. If you want a particular domain to write to the pub-
lic_content_rw_t domain, you must set the appropriate boolean. allow_DOMAIN_anon_write. So for rsync you would execute:
setsebool -P allow_rsync_anon_write=1
BOOLEANS
system-config-selinux is a GUI tool available to customize SELinux policy settings.
AUTHOR
This manual page was written by Dan Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com>.
SEE ALSO
selinux(8), rsync(1), chcon(1), setsebool(8), semanage(8)
dwalsh@redhat.com 17 Jan 2005 rsync_selinux(8)