I have an executable called DataExport (not that the name means much), but anyhow, it is a job that runs to call oracle stored procs which then export data out to a text file. Depending on which export is calling the DataExport, different stored procs are run. Exports 1, 2 and 3 all succeed in that the last thing DataExport does is once the file has completely come out of Oracle and is in the text file, the DataExport program moves the file to an Output folder.
The problem I am encountering is that Exports 4 & 5 produce very large files and take significantly longer (721499383 bytes in about 40 minutes compared with 75564 in about 2 minutes) and they don't ever get moved to the Output folder. I have put tracing into the executable to see what it is doing at the very end and there is nothing to indicate why it doesn't complete the job of moving the file to the Output folder. Here, for example, are the last four lines of the trace:
Prior to that are thousands of those exact same lines. So the question becomes, is there any setting in AIX that kills a pid or stops a pid if it hits a certain limit of memory or diskspace?
Help!! I loaded OS X Panther on my Mac G4 and found that many files previously saved as txt files were inadventently converted to Unix executable files. When I try to read these in Word, the Word filters cannot recognize or translate the file properly. Does anyone know how to translate these files?... (1 Reply)
This is probably very easy but I would like to know a way to list all my files in all my directories that are readable and executable to everyone. I was told to use find or ls and I tried some stuff but couldnt get it to work. I understand that its dangerous to have files with these permissions for... (4 Replies)
This question always confuses me :-
Suppose I write a program and compile it on a machine with operating system A and processor B
will the exe file run on a machine
with operating system A2 but processor B
operating system A but processor B2
operating system A2 and processor B2........
... (9 Replies)
Hi,
Does anyone know how to make BASH provide a list of possible completions on the first tab, and then start cycling through the possibilites on the next tab?
Right now this is what I have in my .bashrc:
bind "set show-all-if-ambiguous on"
bind \\C-o:menu-complete
This allows... (0 Replies)
How to list out the files which are not accessed for the last n days?
and
How to list out all the executable files in a directory?
can anyone help me on the above?
Thanks in advance. (3 Replies)
hello.
My question, basically is: what is the definition of unix/linux exec files, or
what makes a file executable?
More specifically, must a unix source file that was compiled using gcc have exec permissions in order to be considered executable?
Is it right to say that a unix/linux exec file... (1 Reply)
Hi!I'm new in this forum,also in shell scripting! :P
I'd like to help me with an issue!the project wants to make a variable with a directory(any) and then print all executable files of this directory,sorted by size!Thank you! (8 Replies)
Hello experts,
I would like to know if is possible to create a default acl rule to a directory.
in this directory all files created should have executable permissions by the group IT.
i tried setfacl -m d:g:it:rwx /files
tried to change the mask setfacl -m m::rwx /files
but i still... (3 Replies)
Bash version 4.4.20 / Ubuntu 16.0.4
Hello,
I tried to write a script that gathers some data and passes them to an executable.
The executed application answers with an error. The echo output in the script returns correct values.
If I copy/paste the last echo command, it get's executed... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: sushi2k7
2 Replies
LEARN ABOUT REDHAT
sortm
SORTM(1) [nmh-1.5] SORTM(1)NAME
sortm - sort messages
SYNOPSIS
sortm [+folder] [msgs] [-datefield field] [-textfield field] [-notextfield] [-limit days] [-nolimit] [-verbose | -noverbose] [-version]
[-help]
DESCRIPTION
Sortm sorts the specified messages in the named folder according to the chronological order of the "Date:" field of each message.
The -verbose switch directs sortm to tell the user the general actions that it is taking to place the folder in sorted order.
The -datefield field switch tells sortm the name of the field to use when making the date comparison. If the user has a special field in
each message, such as "BB-Posted:" or "Delivery-Date:", then the -datefield switch can be used to direct sortm which field to examine.
The -textfield field switch causes sortm to sort messages by the specified text field. If this field is "subject", any leading "re:" is
stripped off. In any case, all characters except letters and numbers are stripped and the resulting strings are sorted datefield-major,
textfield-minor, using a case insensitive comparison.
With -textfield field, if -limit days is specified, messages with similar textfields that are dated within `days' of each other appear
together. Specifying -nolimit makes the limit infinity. With -limit 0, the sort is instead made textfield-major, date-minor.
For example, to order a folder by date-major, subject-minor, use:
sortm -textfield subject +folder
FILES
$HOME/.mh_profile The user profile
PROFILE COMPONENTS
Path: To determine the user's nmh directory
Current-Folder: To find the default current folder
SEE ALSO folder(1)DEFAULTS
`+folder' defaults to the current folder
`msgs"'defaultstoall"
`-datefield' defaults to date
`-notextfield'
`-noverbose'
`-nolimit'
CONTEXT
If a folder is given, it will become the current folder. If the current message is moved, sortm
will preserve its status as current.
HISTORY
Timezones used to be ignored when comparing dates: they aren't any more.
Messages which were in the folder, but not specified by `msgs', used to be moved to the end of the folder; now such messages are left
untouched.
Sortm sometimes did not preserve the message numbering in a folder (e.g., messages 1, 3, and 5, might have been renumbered to 1, 2, 3 after
sorting). This was a bug, and has been fixed. To compress the message numbering in a folder, use "folder -pack" as always.
BUGS
If sortm encounters a message without a date-field, or if the message has a date-field that sortm cannot parse, then sortm attempts to keep
the message in the same relative position. This does not always work. For instance, if the first message encountered lacks a date which
can be parsed, then it will usually be placed at the end of the messages being sorted.
When sortm complains about a message which it can't temporally order, it complains about the message number prior to sorting. It should
indicate what the message number will be after sorting.
MH.6.8 11 June 2012 SORTM(1)