Sponsored Content
Full Discussion: SIGSEGV Signal handling
Special Forums UNIX and Linux Applications SIGSEGV Signal handling Post 302342011 by jim mcnamara on Friday 7th of August 2009 07:22:37 AM
Old 08-07-2009
First off, do not run code in production that gets a SIGSEGV signal. It is really bad practice.

The simplest way, and definitely not the best is to block the signal with a call to signal()
Code:
#include <signal.h>
#include <stdio.h>

void my_signal_handler(int sig)
{
    write(STDERR_FILENO, "SEGFAULT!\n", 10); 
    signal(SIGSEGV, my_signal_handler); // reset the signal handler for SIGSEGV
    abort();
}

int main()
{
   signal(SIGSEGV, my_signal_handler); // initial set of signal handler
   /* do stuff here  */
   signal(SIGSEGV, SIG_DFL);  // restore default behavior

}

This is an example not meant to be used for production - it has potential race conditions, but you can use it to debug a SIGSEGV problem. In the my_signal_handler function be aware that you need to call only async safe functions like write() not std C lib funcions like printf()
 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

Handling SIGUSR2 signal

HI, I need to handle SIGUSR2 signal in my application to change the state of the application dynamically. I have implemented the signal handler. However the application is able to catch only one SIGUSR2 signal. The second SIGUSR2 signal causes the application to crash. This is happning only with... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: diganta
3 Replies

2. Programming

Signal Handling

Hi folks I'm trying to write a signal handler (in c on HPUX) that will catch the child process launched by execl when it's finished so that I can check a compliance file. The signal handler appears to catch the child process terminating however when the signal handler completes the parent... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: themezzaman
3 Replies

3. Programming

Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.

Dear all, I used debugger from C++ and these are the message I got: Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x00323fc0 in free () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6 (gdb) info s #0 0x00323fc0 in free () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6 #1 0x00794fa1 in operator delete () from... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: napapanbkk
5 Replies

4. Shell Programming and Scripting

Signal handling in Perl

Guys, I'm doing signal handling in Perl. I'm trying to catch ^C signal inside the script. There two scripts : one shell script and one perl script. The shell script calls the perl script. For e.g. shell script a.sh and perl scipt sig.pl. Shell script a.sh looks something like this :... (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: obelix
6 Replies

5. Programming

signal handling question

Hello all, I am starting to learn signal handling in Linux and have been trying out some simple codes to deal with SIGALRM. The code shown below sets a timer to count down. When the timer is finished a SIGALRM is produced. The handler for the signal just increments a variable called count. This... (7 Replies)
Discussion started by: fox_hound_33
7 Replies

6. Programming

signal handling while in a function other than main

Hi, I have a main loop which calls a sub loop, which finally returns to the main loop itself. The main loop runs when a flag is set. Now, I have a signal handler for SIGINT, which resets the flag and thus stops the main loop. Suppose I send SIGINT while the program is in subloop, I get an error... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: Theju
1 Replies

7. Programming

Signal handling

I am trying to write a small program where I can send signals and then ask for an action to be triggered if that signal is received. For example, here is an example where I am trying to write a programme that will say you pressed ctrl*c when someone presses ctrl+c. My questions are what you would... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: #moveon
1 Replies

8. Programming

problem in SIGSEGV signal handling

i wrote handler for sigsegv such that i can allocate memory for a variable to which sigsegv generated for illlegal acces of memory. my code is #include <signal.h> #include<stdio.h> #include<stdlib.h> #include<string.h> char *j; void segv_handler(int dummy) { j=(char *)malloc(10); ... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: pavan6754
4 Replies

9. Programming

problem in reforking and signal handling

hi friends i have a problem in signal handling ... let me explain my problem clearly.. i have four process .. main process forks two child process and each child process again forks another new process respectively... the problem is whenever i kill the child process it is reforking and the... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: senvenugopal
2 Replies

10. AIX

Received signal #11, SIGSEGV [default] on AIX 6.1

Hello, One of our customer is getting segmentation fault when he runs his shell script which invokes our executable on AIX 6.1. On AIX 5.3, there were no issues. Here is the truss output. 811242: __loadx(0x0A040000, 0xF0D3A26C, 0x00000000, 0x00000009, 0x00000000) = 0xF026E884... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: erra_krishna
0 Replies
SIGNAL(2)						     Linux Programmer's Manual							 SIGNAL(2)

NAME
signal - ANSI C signal handling SYNOPSIS
#include <signal.h> typedef void (*sighandler_t)(int); sighandler_t signal(int signum, sighandler_t handler); DESCRIPTION
The behavior of signal() varies across Unix versions, and has also varied historically across different versions of Linux. Avoid its use: use sigaction(2) instead. See Portability below. signal() sets the disposition of the signal signum to handler, which is either SIG_IGN, SIG_DFL, or the address of a programmer-defined function (a "signal handler"). If the signal signum is delivered to the process, then one of the following happens: * If the disposition is set to SIG_IGN, then the signal is ignored. * If the disposition is set to SIG_DFL, then the default action associated with the signal (see signal(7)) occurs. * If the disposition is set to a function, then first either the disposition is reset to SIG_DFL, or the signal is blocked (see Portabil- ity below), and then handler is called with argument signum. If invocation of the handler caused the signal to be blocked, then the signal is unblocked upon return from the handler. The signals SIGKILL and SIGSTOP cannot be caught or ignored. RETURN VALUE
signal() returns the previous value of the signal handler, or SIG_ERR on error. ERRORS
EINVAL signum is invalid. CONFORMING TO
C89, C99, POSIX.1-2001. NOTES
The effects of signal() in a multithreaded process are unspecified. According to POSIX, the behavior of a process is undefined after it ignores a SIGFPE, SIGILL, or SIGSEGV signal that was not generated by kill(2) or raise(3). Integer division by zero has undefined result. On some architectures it will generate a SIGFPE signal. (Also divid- ing the most negative integer by -1 may generate SIGFPE.) Ignoring this signal might lead to an endless loop. See sigaction(2) for details on what happens when SIGCHLD is set to SIG_IGN. See signal(7) for a list of the async-signal-safe functions that can be safely called from inside a signal handler. The use of sighandler_t is a GNU extension. Various versions of libc predefine this type; libc4 and libc5 define SignalHandler; glibc defines sig_t and, when _GNU_SOURCE is defined, also sighandler_t. Without use of such a type, the declaration of signal() is the somewhat harder to read: void ( *signal(int signum, void (*handler)(int)) ) (int); Portability The only portable use of signal() is to set a signal's disposition to SIG_DFL or SIG_IGN. The semantics when using signal() to establish a signal handler vary across systems (and POSIX.1 explicitly permits this variation); do not use it for this purpose. POSIX.1 solved the portability mess by specifying sigaction(2), which provides explicit control of the semantics when a signal handler is invoked; use that interface instead of signal(). In the original Unix systems, when a handler that was established using signal() was invoked by the delivery of a signal, the disposition of the signal would be reset to SIG_DFL, and the system did not block delivery of further instances of the signal. System V also provides these semantics for signal(). This was bad because the signal might be delivered again before the handler had a chance to reestablish itself. Furthermore, rapid deliveries of the same signal could result in recursive invocations of the handler. BSD improved on this situation by changing the semantics of signal handling (but, unfortunately, silently changed the semantics when estab- lishing a handler with signal()). On BSD, when a signal handler is invoked, the signal disposition is not reset, and further instances of the signal are blocked from being delivered while the handler is executing. The situation on Linux is as follows: * The kernel's signal() system call provides System V semantics. * By default, in glibc 2 and later, the signal() wrapper function does not invoke the kernel system call. Instead, it calls sigaction(2) using flags that supply BSD semantics. This default behavior is provided as long as the _BSD_SOURCE feature test macro is defined. By default, _BSD_SOURCE is defined; it is also implicitly defined if one defines _GNU_SOURCE, and can of course be explicitly defined. On glibc 2 and later, if the _BSD_SOURCE feature test macro is not defined, then signal() provides System V semantics. (The default implicit definition of _BSD_SOURCE is not provided if one invokes gcc(1) in one of its standard modes (-std=xxx or -ansi) or defines var- ious other feature test macros such as _POSIX_SOURCE, _XOPEN_SOURCE, or _SVID_SOURCE; see feature_test_macros(7).) * The signal() function in Linux libc4 and libc5 provide System V semantics. If one on a libc5 system includes <bsd/signal.h> instead of <signal.h>, then signal() provides BSD semantics. SEE ALSO
kill(1), alarm(2), kill(2), killpg(2), pause(2), sigaction(2), signalfd(2), sigpending(2), sigprocmask(2), sigqueue(2), sigsuspend(2), bsd_signal(3), raise(3), siginterrupt(3), sigsetops(3), sigvec(3), sysv_signal(3), feature_test_macros(7), signal(7) COLOPHON
This page is part of release 3.27 of the Linux man-pages project. A description of the project, and information about reporting bugs, can be found at http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/. Linux 2008-07-11 SIGNAL(2)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:21 PM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy