Sponsored Content
Top Forums Shell Programming and Scripting Refining if loops using sed/awk Post 302259806 by Christoph Spohr on Wednesday 19th of November 2008 03:51:01 AM
Old 11-19-2008
Hi,

try sed with:

Code:
sed "s/a\s*=\s*b;/\n{\n&\n}/;s/a\s*=\s*c;/\n{\n&\n}/" file

\n means newline, \s* means followed by none or more spaces, & stand for the matched string. The second case is basically the same.

HTH Chris
 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Shell Programming and Scripting

While loops and awk

I am trying to make a script that will replace backslashes in a file, but only if the occurance is a pathname. In the file, there are a lot of regular expressions as well, so I'm trying to preserve the integrity of those regular expressions, but convert Windows relative paths. I'm using bash and... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: Loriel
1 Replies

2. Shell Programming and Scripting

Awk formatting of a data file - nested for loops?

Hello - is there any way in awk I can do... 4861 x(1) y(1) z(1) 4959 x(1) y(1) z(1) 5007 x(1) y(1) z(1) 4861 x(2) y(2) z(2) 4959 x(2) y(2) z(2) 5007 x(2) y(2) z(2) 4861 x(3) y(3) z(3) 4959 x(3) y(3) z(3) 5007 x(3) y(3) z(3) to become... 4861 x(1) y(1) z(1) 4861 x(2) y(2) z(2)... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: catwoman
3 Replies

3. Shell Programming and Scripting

sed used in loops

Hello: This is my first post here, regarding my first attempt at shell scripting.I was given a large amount of word documents which I need to first make into text files, and then change the commercial names to generic names (they are lists of therapeutic drugs), as well as remove some unnecesary... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: riayi
1 Replies

4. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Passing KSH variable to AWK with two loops

Hi, I need some help to figure out why an outer for loop KSH variable does not decode in AWK but inner for loop does. Below is my code, If I hard code variable 'SUBSEQ' in AWK it works but if I try to pass the SUBSEQ from KSH, it does not and when I pass the variable 'NAM' from KSH it works: I... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: chowdhut
1 Replies

5. Shell Programming and Scripting

awk command to avoid loops

Hi... I need a help in using the awk command or any other solution to avoid the usage of loops. My question is : I have a input like this : field1|field2|field3|field4|field5|field6|field7|field8|field9 ex : 4000|testing|scenario|14450|500|320|450|200|100 where the... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: vijayarajvp
2 Replies

6. Shell Programming and Scripting

SOLVED: Refining an awk command

I have a file (file1) with in the below format ST*820*212121 BPR*C*213212.20*C*212*CCD*01***01*071000013*DA*321321*101208 TRN*1*21321321*13213 N1*PR*3232. dff. SYS.*91*3232 ENT*1 N1*PE* 2132121321 RMR*TN*234456677888**192387.20*192387.20 REF*IV*234456677888*213213 3213 UNI... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: Muthuraj K
0 Replies

7. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Bourne-sh (not bash) question about nested loops and sed

Here's the input: alpha, numeric or alphanumeric string ("line 1 string") numeric string ("line 2 string") numeric string ("line 3 string") numeric string ("line 4 string") ... where - each numeric string is in a pattern that can be matched with RE but - there can be any number of... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: uiop44
2 Replies

8. UNIX Desktop Questions & Answers

awk using 2 input files instead of while loops

Hi Friends, I have two files as input with data that looks like this: file1.txt 1 2 3 4 file2.txt a,aa b,bb c,cc d,dd e,ee f,ff instead of me doing 2 while loops to get the combinations while read line_file1 (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: kokoro
2 Replies

9. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Dealing with Empty files, AWK and Loops

I write this bit of code to calculate the mean and variance for all the files in one directory and print the mean and variance in a separate folder but with the same file name. FILES="data/*" for X in $FILES do name=$(basename $X) awk '{x=$0; s+=$0; n++} END{mean=s/n; for (i in x){ss... (20 Replies)
Discussion started by: A-V
20 Replies

10. Shell Programming and Scripting

Help with refining script

Happy new year all! I would like to ask for some assistance refining the script I have put together below. I am a noob with bash scripting and still getting used to all the options available originally coming from a windows background couch, couch... Now I am more than happy in NIX world :b::)... (13 Replies)
Discussion started by: Simplify
13 Replies
A2P(1)							 Perl Programmers Reference Guide						    A2P(1)

NAME
a2p - Awk to Perl translator SYNOPSIS
a2p [options] filename DESCRIPTION
A2p takes an awk script specified on the command line (or from standard input) and produces a comparable perl script on the standard out- put. Options Options include: -D<number> sets debugging flags. -F<character> tells a2p that this awk script is always invoked with this -F switch. -n<fieldlist> specifies the names of the input fields if input does not have to be split into an array. If you were translating an awk script that processes the password file, you might say: a2p -7 -nlogin.password.uid.gid.gcos.shell.home Any delimiter can be used to separate the field names. -<number> causes a2p to assume that input will always have that many fields. -o tells a2p to use old awk behavior. The only current differences are: o Old awk always has a line loop, even if there are no line actions, whereas new awk does not. o In old awk, sprintf is extremely greedy about its arguments. For example, given the statement print sprintf(some_args), extra_args; old awk considers extra_args to be arguments to "sprintf"; new awk considers them arguments to "print". "Considerations" A2p cannot do as good a job translating as a human would, but it usually does pretty well. There are some areas where you may want to examine the perl script produced and tweak it some. Here are some of them, in no particular order. There is an awk idiom of putting int() around a string expression to force numeric interpretation, even though the argument is always inte- ger anyway. This is generally unneeded in perl, but a2p can't tell if the argument is always going to be integer, so it leaves it in. You may wish to remove it. Perl differentiates numeric comparison from string comparison. Awk has one operator for both that decides at run time which comparison to do. A2p does not try to do a complete job of awk emulation at this point. Instead it guesses which one you want. It's almost always right, but it can be spoofed. All such guesses are marked with the comment ""#???"". You should go through and check them. You might want to run at least once with the -w switch to perl, which will warn you if you use == where you should have used eq. Perl does not attempt to emulate the behavior of awk in which nonexistent array elements spring into existence simply by being referenced. If somehow you are relying on this mechanism to create null entries for a subsequent for...in, they won't be there in perl. If a2p makes a split line that assigns to a list of variables that looks like (Fld1, Fld2, Fld3...) you may want to rerun a2p using the -n option mentioned above. This will let you name the fields throughout the script. If it splits to an array instead, the script is probably referring to the number of fields somewhere. The exit statement in awk doesn't necessarily exit; it goes to the END block if there is one. Awk scripts that do contortions within the END block to bypass the block under such circumstances can be simplified by removing the conditional in the END block and just exiting directly from the perl script. Perl has two kinds of array, numerically-indexed and associative. Perl associative arrays are called "hashes". Awk arrays are usually translated to hashes, but if you happen to know that the index is always going to be numeric you could change the {...} to [...]. Itera- tion over a hash is done using the keys() function, but iteration over an array is NOT. You might need to modify any loop that iterates over such an array. Awk starts by assuming OFMT has the value %.6g. Perl starts by assuming its equivalent, $#, to have the value %.20g. You'll want to set $# explicitly if you use the default value of OFMT. Near the top of the line loop will be the split operation that is implicit in the awk script. There are times when you can move this down past some conditionals that test the entire record so that the split is not done as often. For aesthetic reasons you may wish to change the array base $[ from 1 back to perl's default of 0, but remember to change all array sub- scripts AND all substr() and index() operations to match. Cute comments that say "# Here is a workaround because awk is dumb" are passed through unmodified. Awk scripts are often embedded in a shell script that pipes stuff into and out of awk. Often the shell script wrapper can be incorporated into the perl script, since perl can start up pipes into and out of itself, and can do other things that awk can't do by itself. Scripts that refer to the special variables RSTART and RLENGTH can often be simplified by referring to the variables $`, $& and $', as long as they are within the scope of the pattern match that sets them. The produced perl script may have subroutines defined to deal with awk's semantics regarding getline and print. Since a2p usually picks correctness over efficiency. it is almost always possible to rewrite such code to be more efficient by discarding the semantic sugar. For efficiency, you may wish to remove the keyword from any return statement that is the last statement executed in a subroutine. A2p catches the most common case, but doesn't analyze embedded blocks for subtler cases. ARGV[0] translates to $ARGV0, but ARGV[n] translates to $ARGV[$n]. A loop that tries to iterate over ARGV[0] won't find it. ENVIRONMENT
A2p uses no environment variables. AUTHOR
Larry Wall <larry@wall.org> FILES
SEE ALSO
perl The perl compiler/interpreter s2p sed to perl translator DIAGNOSTICS
BUGS
It would be possible to emulate awk's behavior in selecting string versus numeric operations at run time by inspection of the operands, but it would be gross and inefficient. Besides, a2p almost always guesses right. Storage for the awk syntax tree is currently static, and can run out. perl v5.8.0 2002-06-01 A2P(1)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:14 AM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy