04-06-2008
Thank you for the new knowledge you have given me re: how links actually work.
hagar
8 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting
1. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers
How can I find all symbolic links across the network to a directory (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: mehtad
2 Replies
2. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers
how do i get the list of symbolic link names for a particular file programatically (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: b_u_n_1234
4 Replies
3. Shell Programming and Scripting
Hi all,
I have several links to a file. Is there any command or anyway to get all those links.
Thanks in advance
-Chanakya (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: Chanakya.m
3 Replies
4. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers
How would one find and list all links in a file system? My situation is
that I built several servers for disaster recovery, mirror images of
several servers in our main location. Instead of doing a "ls -l" on every
file system down the /usr structor to verify that I have all the necessary
links... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: ruger14
3 Replies
5. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers
ls -l shows the number of links for each file. Is there a command that will show the link sources for a specific file? Running find on the entire filesystem and doing a little Perl "magic" is the only method I'm aware of. I'm running SunOS 5.8.
Thanks. (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: effigy
6 Replies
6. Shell Programming and Scripting
Hi,
I would like to do a scripting for finding the links based on the name I have and replace the links with the new name. General find command lists everything for that links ( means all the sub-sirs and all the files), i need only the main link and replace.
Can you anyone give me some... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: rrb2009
1 Replies
7. Solaris
When loooking at files in a directory using ls, how can I tell if I have a hard link or soft link? (11 Replies)
Discussion started by: Harleyrci
11 Replies
8. AIX
Hi
I'm logged in as root in an aix box
Which command will list all the soft links and hard links present in the server ? (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: newtoaixos
2 Replies
SMRSH(8) System Manager's Manual SMRSH(8)
NAME
smrsh - restricted shell for sendmail
SYNOPSIS
smrsh -c command
DESCRIPTION
The smrsh program is intended as a replacement for sh for use in the ``prog'' mailer in sendmail(8) configuration files. It sharply limits
the commands that can be run using the ``|program'' syntax of sendmail in order to improve the over all security of your system. Briefly,
even if a ``bad guy'' can get sendmail to run a program without going through an alias or forward file, smrsh limits the set of programs
that he or she can execute.
Briefly, smrsh limits programs to be in a single directory, by default /etc/smrsh, allowing the system administrator to choose the set of
acceptable commands, and to the shell builtin commands ``exec'', ``exit'', and ``echo''. It also rejects any commands with the characters
``', `<', `>', `;', `$', `(', `)', `
' (carriage return), or `
' (newline) on the command line to prevent ``end run'' attacks. It allows
``||'' and ``&&'' to enable commands like: ``"|exec /usr/local/bin/procmail -f- /etc/procmailrcs/user || exit 75"''
Initial pathnames on programs are stripped, so forwarding to ``/usr/ucb/vacation'', ``/usr/bin/vacation'', ``/home/server/mydir/bin/vaca-
tion'', and ``vacation'' all actually forward to ``/etc/smrsh/vacation''.
System administrators should be conservative about populating the /etc/smrsh directory. Reasonable additions are vacation(1), procmail(1),
and the like. No matter how brow-beaten you may be, never include any shell or shell-like program (such as perl(1)) in the /etc/smrsh
directory. Note that this does not restrict the use of shell or perl scripts in the sm.bin directory (using the ``#!'' syntax); it simply
disallows execution of arbitrary programs.
FILES
/etc/smrsh - directory for restricted programs
SEE ALSO
sendmail(8)
$Date: 2002/04/25 13:33:40 $ SMRSH(8)