Sponsored Content
Top Forums Shell Programming and Scripting merge based on common, awk help Post 302175810 by jkl_jkl on Sunday 16th of March 2008 04:16:54 AM
Old 03-16-2008
merge based on common, awk help

All,

Code:
$ cat x.txt
z 11 az
x 12 ax
y 13 ay

$ cat y.txt
ay TT
ax NN

Output required:
y 13 ay TT
x 12 ax NN

 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Shell Programming and Scripting

merge rows based on a common column

Hi guys, Please guide me if you have a solution to this problem. I have tried paste -s but it's not giving the desired output. I have a file with the following content- A123 box1 B345 bat2 C431 my_id A123 service C431 box1 A123 my_id I need two different outputs- OUTPUT1 A123... (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: smriti_shridhar
6 Replies

2. Shell Programming and Scripting

Merge files of differrent size with one field common in both files using awk

hi, i am facing a problem in merging two files using awk, the problem is as stated below, file1: A|B|C|D|E|F|G|H|I|1 M|N|O|P|Q|R|S|T|U|2 AA|BB|CC|DD|EE|FF|GG|HH|II|1 .... .... .... file2 : 1|Mn|op|qr (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: shashi1982
2 Replies

3. Shell Programming and Scripting

"Join" or "Merge" more than 2 files into single output based on common key (column)

Hi All, I have working (Perl) code to combine 2 input files into a single output file using the join function that works to a point, but has the following limitations: 1. I am restrained to 2 input files only. 2. Only the "matched" fields are written out to the "matched" output file and... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: Katabatic
1 Replies

4. Shell Programming and Scripting

Gawk / Awk Merge Lines based on Key

Hi Guys, After windows died on my netbook I installed Lubuntu and discovered Gawk about a month ago. After using Excel for 10+ years I'm amazed how quick and easily Gawk can process data but I'm stuck with a little problem merging data from multiple lines. I'm an SEO Consultant and provide... (9 Replies)
Discussion started by: Jamesfirst
9 Replies

5. Shell Programming and Scripting

file merge based on common columns

I have two files 1.txt 34, ABC, 7, 8, 0.9 35, CDE, 6.5, -2, 0.01 2.txt 34, ABC, 9, 6, -1.9 35, CDE, 8.5, -2.3, 5.01 So in both files common columns are 1 and 2 so final o/p should look like 34, ABC, 7, 8, 0.9, 9, 6, -1.9 35, CDE, 6.5, -2, 0.01, 8.5, -2.3, 5.01 I tried using... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: manas_ranjan
3 Replies

6. Shell Programming and Scripting

Merge with common column

hi i have two files and i wanted to join them using common column. try to do this using "join" command but that did not help. File 1: 123 9a.vcf hy92.vcf hy90.vcf Index Ref Alt Ref Alt Ref Alt 315 14 0 7 4 ... (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: empyrean
6 Replies

7. Shell Programming and Scripting

Merge multiple lines in same file with common key using awk

I've been a Unix admin for nearly 30 years and never learned AWK. I've seen several similar posts here, but haven't been able to adapt the answers to my situation. AWK is so damn cryptic! ;) I have a single file with ~900 lines (CSV list). Each line starts with an ID, but with different stuff... (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: protosd
6 Replies

8. Shell Programming and Scripting

Merge files based on both common and uncommon rows

Hi, I have two files A (2190 rows) and file B (1100 rows). I want to merge the contents of two files based on common field, also I need the unmatched rows from file A file A: ABC XYZ PQR file B: >LMN|chr1:11000-12456: >ABC|chr15:176578-187678: >PQR|chr3:14567-15866: output... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: Diya123
3 Replies

9. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Merge selective columns from files based on common key

Hi, I am trying to selectively merge two files based on keys reported in the 1st column. File1: #file1-header1 file1-header2 111 qwe rtz uio 198 asd fgh jkl 165 yxc 789 poi uzt rew 89 lkj File2: #file2-header2 file2-header2 165 ghz nko2 ... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: dovah
2 Replies

10. Shell Programming and Scripting

awk - Merge two files based on one key

Hi, I am struggling with the an awk command to merge two files based on a common key. I want to append the value from File2 ($2) onto the end of File1 where $1 from each file matches - If no match then nothing is apended File1 COL1|COL2|COL3|COL4|COL5|COL6|COL7... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: Ads89
3 Replies
GIT-MERGE-BASE(1)						    Git Manual							 GIT-MERGE-BASE(1)

NAME
git-merge-base - Find as good common ancestors as possible for a merge SYNOPSIS
git merge-base [-a|--all] <commit> <commit>... git merge-base [-a|--all] --octopus <commit>... git merge-base --is-ancestor <commit> <commit> git merge-base --independent <commit>... DESCRIPTION
git merge-base finds best common ancestor(s) between two commits to use in a three-way merge. One common ancestor is better than another common ancestor if the latter is an ancestor of the former. A common ancestor that does not have any better common ancestor is a best common ancestor, i.e. a merge base. Note that there can be more than one merge base for a pair of commits. OPERATION MODE
As the most common special case, specifying only two commits on the command line means computing the merge base between the given two commits. More generally, among the two commits to compute the merge base from, one is specified by the first commit argument on the command line; the other commit is a (possibly hypothetical) commit that is a merge across all the remaining commits on the command line. As a consequence, the merge base is not necessarily contained in each of the commit arguments if more than two commits are specified. This is different from git-show-branch(1) when used with the --merge-base option. --octopus Compute the best common ancestors of all supplied commits, in preparation for an n-way merge. This mimics the behavior of git show-branch --merge-base. --independent Instead of printing merge bases, print a minimal subset of the supplied commits with the same ancestors. In other words, among the commits given, list those which cannot be reached from any other. This mimics the behavior of git show-branch --independent. --is-ancestor Check if the first <commit> is an ancestor of the second <commit>, and exit with status 0 if true, or with status 1 if not. Errors are signaled by a non-zero status that is not 1. OPTIONS
-a, --all Output all merge bases for the commits, instead of just one. DISCUSSION
Given two commits A and B, git merge-base A B will output a commit which is reachable from both A and B through the parent relationship. For example, with this topology: o---o---o---B / ---o---1---o---o---o---A the merge base between A and B is 1. Given three commits A, B and C, git merge-base A B C will compute the merge base between A and a hypothetical commit M, which is a merge between B and C. For example, with this topology: o---o---o---o---C / / o---o---o---B / / ---2---1---o---o---o---A the result of git merge-base A B C is 1. This is because the equivalent topology with a merge commit M between B and C is: o---o---o---o---o / / o---o---o---o---M / / ---2---1---o---o---o---A and the result of git merge-base A M is 1. Commit 2 is also a common ancestor between A and M, but 1 is a better common ancestor, because 2 is an ancestor of 1. Hence, 2 is not a merge base. The result of git merge-base --octopus A B C is 2, because 2 is the best common ancestor of all commits. When the history involves criss-cross merges, there can be more than one best common ancestor for two commits. For example, with this topology: ---1---o---A / X / ---2---o---o---B both 1 and 2 are merge-bases of A and B. Neither one is better than the other (both are best merge bases). When the --all option is not given, it is unspecified which best one is output. A common idiom to check "fast-forward-ness" between two commits A and B is (or at least used to be) to compute the merge base between A and B, and check if it is the same as A, in which case, A is an ancestor of B. You will see this idiom used often in older scripts. A=$(git rev-parse --verify A) if test "$A" = "$(git merge-base A B)" then ... A is an ancestor of B ... fi In modern git, you can say this in a more direct way: if git merge-base --is-ancestor A B then ... A is an ancestor of B ... fi instead. SEE ALSO
git-rev-list(1), git-show-branch(1), git-merge(1) GIT
Part of the git(1) suite Git 1.8.3.1 06/10/2014 GIT-MERGE-BASE(1)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:21 PM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy