Sponsored Content
Full Discussion: Solaris Hardware and ROHS
Operating Systems Solaris Solaris Hardware and ROHS Post 302161408 by dangral on Thursday 24th of January 2008 11:54:56 AM
Old 01-24-2008
Well, for example the V440 has ROHS compliant and non-compliant versions as well. I'm trying to determine which of those we own.
 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Solaris hardware error

hi guys, need some help on this error message. im running solaris 2.6 on a e3500 and lately i encountered this error:- lp: Warning: Received SIGPIPE; continuing last message repeated 1 time Multiple Softerrors: 2 Intermittent, 4 Persistent, and 0 Sticky Softerrors accumulated from... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: giriplug
4 Replies

2. Solaris

hardware support for solaris 9 or 10

Hi boss, i want to purches one second hand system intel P3 for practice.vender having mercury mother board.it will support sun 9 or 10. if any problem will create while configure like (ex:-apache) .tell me which configuration (intel) is best for practice.In intel system what are the... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: rjay.com
2 Replies

3. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

Migrating Solaris 9 to different hardware

Hi, I am new to this forum and hope someone can help. Does anyone know how to restore a Solaris 9 backup tape from server A to a completely different server B hardware. Both boxes are sun 64bit. Your help is much appreciated. Thank you Jan. (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: snerta
5 Replies

4. What is on Your Mind?

RoHS question

I am just curious. How is RoHS compliancy impacting IT? I understand it is addressing environmental concerns but what are other impacts (positive/negative) if any? Does this impact tax liability somehow? (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: mhm4
1 Replies

5. Solaris

How do I know which HBA cards' hardware I have (on Solaris 10) ?

Hi, I'm trying to determine which HBA cards are installed on my Solaris 10 (Sun-Fire-V240) machine. The relevant data I have is below, but from it I cannot ascertain for sure if I have Emulex 10000 or 11000 HBA cards. Can anyone suggest how to determine my HBA hardware ? Thanks, Ron. ... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: ronbarak
4 Replies

6. Solaris

regarding sun solaris hardware

hi :), i am new to this forum and i am in need of some help. one of my friend i having a Sun Ultra 2 UPA/Sbus (UltraSPARC-II 296Mhz) 640 MB ram. i am not sure if that configuration will be helpful to try out some sysadmin commands. this machine has a 21-inch monster monitor, which i think... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: sudhiroracle
5 Replies

7. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

solaris 9 hardware mulfunction

Hello, Im working on solaris 9 and I need to write script which monitoring several hardware componenets for any failures such as memory , Disks , power supply etc. I using prtdiag to extract this info. What should I check in the output for : Memory (Is the block of "Memory Module Groups"... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: Alalush
1 Replies

8. Solaris

solaris X86 Hardware Checkup (HP HW)

Hi ... i am new about HP -Solaris 10 x86 I have fresh hardware, I need to check the RAM , CPU, BUS , Hard drives mounted Can you please help me with commnds. Thanks in advance (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: anand87
3 Replies

9. Hardware

RoHS and non-RoHS

hi does an RoHS V890 server accept components (I/O board , motherboard, CPU/MEMORY modules) from non-RoHS V890 severs ??? because they have different part numbers thnx (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: bahjatm
3 Replies

10. Solaris

Solaris 11 no sound despite finding hardware

Hello Everyone, I'm new to Solaris, less than a week to give an idea how green I am.:eek: Although new to UNIX, I've been running Linux (i.e. OpenSUSE, Ultimate Edition, Arch, and obviously Ubuntu) for many years, so, I decided to put Solaris 11 on my 12 core opteron. I had a bit of difficulty... (23 Replies)
Discussion started by: Nostradamus1973
23 Replies
FSG(1)									FSG								    FSG(1)

NAME
FSG - manual page for FSG lsb_release v2.0-SuSE SYNOPSIS
lsb_release [OPTION]... DESCRIPTION
FSG lsb_release v2.0-SuSE prints certain LSB (Linux Standard Base) and Distribution information. With no OPTION specified defaults to -v. OPTIONS
-v, --version Display the version of the LSB specification against which the distribution is compliant. -i, --id Display the string id of the distributor. -d, --description Display the single line text description of the distribution. -r, --release Display the release number of the distribution. -c, --codename Display the codename according to the distribution release. -a, --all Display all of the above information. -s, --short Use short output format for information requested by other options (or version if none). -h, --help Display this message. FILES
If the installation is LSB compliant, the "/etc/lsb-release" file should contain the LSB_VERSION field. The value of the field should be a colon separated list of supported module versions indicating the LSB specification modules to which the installation is compliant. If the installation is not compliant, the above field should not be present. Optional fields are DISTRIB_ID, DISTRIB_RELEASE, DISTRIB_CODENAME, DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION and can be used to override information which is parsed from the "/etc/distrib-release" file. If the "/etc/lsb-release.d" directory exists, it is searched for filenames which are taken as additional module-version strings to add to LSB_VERSION. The "/etc/distrib-release" file contains a description line which is parsed to get information (especially on currently non-LSB compliant systems). The required line style is: "Distributor release x.x (Codename)" Where Distributor can be a couple of words, but then concatenated (i.e. Linux Foo BarLinux Linux -> FooBarLinux), x.x starts with a digit followed by any non-blank characters, Codename will also be concatenated (blanks cleanup only). release may not be used as a keyword in DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION if you don't want to override "/etc/distrib-release" data. Notice: To support the Debian distributions' lack of information (see "/etc/debian_version" file) some have been directly added into the lsb_release script. EXAMPLES
If the "/etc/lsb-release" file contains: LSB_VERSION="core-2.0-ia64:core-2.0-noarch" DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="I enjoy using my distrib" and the "/etc/lsb-release.d" directory contains: graphics-2.0-ia64 graphics-2.0-noarch and the "/etc/foobar-release" file contains: My Linux Distrib release 1.0RC4 (TryIt) Then the results of various options will be: $ ./lsb_release --all LSB Version: core-2.0-ia64:core-2.0-noarch:graphics-2.0-ia64:graphics-2.0-noarch Distributor ID: MyDistrib Description: I enjoy using my distrib Release: 1.0RC4 Codename: TryIt $ ./lsb_release -a -s 1.0 MyDistrib "I enjoy using my distrib" 1.0RC4 TryIt If the "/etc/lsb-release" file is absent (indicating this is not an LSB compliant distribution), the result will be: $ ./lsb_release -a LSB Version: n/a Distributor ID: MyDistrib Description: My Linux Distrib release 1.0RC4 (TryIt) Release: 1.0RC4 Codename: TryIt REPORTING BUGS
Report bugs at http://bugs.linuxbase.org. Please include a complete, self contained example that will allow the bug to be reproduced, and say which version of lsb_release you are using. COPYRIGHT
Copyright (C) 2000, 2002, 2004 Free Standards Group, Inc. This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICU- LAR PURPOSE. Originally written by Dominique MASSONIE. FSG lsb_release v2.0-SuSE July 2010 FSG(1)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:15 PM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy