09-14-2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Perderabo
Right this second, things seem ok. But even before the today's performance tweaks, there were periods where things semmed ok. So I will wait at least 1 full day before I respond to the poll. And then I will base my vote on the worst case I saw. I hope that this will result in a more useful data point. Or should I take the word "now" in the poll more literally?
Hi Perderabo!
Anyway you want to vote is OK with me! It's always much appreciated to get user feedback on things like performance and other service related topics.
8 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting
1. What is on Your Mind?
I have updated the backend hosting for UNIX.COM and would appreciate feedback either in the form of a vote in the poll or a post so that we can plan for more changes if any are needed.
In particular let me us know if you see any strange behavior from the site as there may still be some... (8 Replies)
Discussion started by: reborg
8 Replies
2. News, Links, Events and Announcements
About 4 years ago I wrote this tool inspired by Rob Urban's collect tool for DEC's Tru64 Unix. What makes this tool as different as collect was in its day is its ability to run at a low overhead and collect tons of stuff. I've expanded the general concept and even include data not available in... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: MarkSeger
0 Replies
3. IP Networking
Setup a site to site VPN between two cisco routers.
One of the site locations is unable to access ports such as https://example.com:9001
How do I let them go into port 9001?
They can ssh, ftp, telnet and everything else.
Is this a VPN issue or ACL access issue?
I put
permit ip host... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: photon
0 Replies
4. Web Development
Hi All,
I am currently managing a web site. I find that during the peak time period,ie,between 1300hrs to 2100hrs everyday,the response slows down whenever i access the applications hosted by the server.However when i try to access the static content in the web server,it loads quickly.
The... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: Hari_Ganesh
2 Replies
5. IP Networking
Hi,
I am trying to establish vpn between my linux server and cisco asa at client side.
I installed openswan on my cent os.
Linux Server
eth0 - 182.2.29.10
Gateway - 182.2.29.1
eth1 - 192.9.200.75
I have simple IPtables Like
WAN="eth0"
LAN="eth1" (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: ashokvpp
0 Replies
6. IP Networking
Q: "Does Cisco 1921 router support,, act as an endpoint for, site to site VPNs using IPSec? If so, how many? "
A: If you get the Cisco 1921/k9 with the security services bundle then it will have built in security features. Cisco, typically includes IP Sec tunnels I believe as part of that... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: Ayaerlee
0 Replies
7. IP Networking
Hi @all,
I try to connect 2 LANs with IPSec/Openswan
LAN 1: 192.168.0.0/24
LAN 2: 192.168.1.0/24
This is my Config:
conn HomeVPN # # Left security gateway, subnet behind it, nexthop toward right. left=192.168.1.29 ... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: bahnhasser83
1 Replies
8. What is on Your Mind?
Hello, I am new here and my name is Robert. I was actually looking for a forums website where I can go with questions regarding Linux and embedded Linux applications. I am fairly new (6 months) to the world of Linux and embedded Linux applications and the the learning curve is steep. When I am not... (13 Replies)
Discussion started by: Circuits
13 Replies
LEARN ABOUT CENTOS
votequorum_fd_get
VOTEQUORUM_FD_GET(3) Corosync Cluster Engine Programmer's Manual VOTEQUORUM_FD_GET(3)
NAME
votequorum_fd_get - Dispatches callbacks from the votequorum service
SYNOPSIS
#include <corosync/votequorum.h>
int votequorum_fd_get(votequorum_handle_t handle, int *fd);
DESCRIPTION
The votequorum_fd_get function is used to retrieve the file descriptor that may be used with the poll system call to determine when vote-
quorum_dispatch(3) won't block. The handle argument may not be used directly with poll because it is not the file descriptor, but instead
an internal identifier used by the votequorum library.
RETURN VALUE
This call returns the CS_OK value if successful, otherwise an error is returned.
ERRORS
CS_ERR_TRY_AGAIN Resource temporarily unavailable
CS_ERR_INVALID_PARAM Invalid argument
CS_ERR_ACCESS Permission denied
CS_ERR_LIBRARY The connection failed
CS_ERR_INTERRUPT System call inturrupted by a signal
CS_ERR_NOT_SUPPORTED The requested protocol/functuality not supported
CS_ERR_MESSAGE_ERROR Incorrect auth message received
CS_ERR_NO_MEMORY Not enough memory to completed the requested task
SEE ALSO
votequorum_overview(8), votequorum_initialize(3), votequorum_finalize(3), votequorum_getinfo(3), votequorum_trackstart(3), votequo-
rum_trackstop(3), votequorum_dispatch(3), votequorum_context_set(3), votequorum_context_get(3), votequorum_setexpected(3), votequo-
rum_setvotes(3)
corosync Man Page 2014-06-10 VOTEQUORUM_FD_GET(3)