Sponsored Content
Full Discussion: Disc Needs Maintenance
Top Forums UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers Disc Needs Maintenance Post 302108255 by BOFH on Sunday 25th of February 2007 01:45:01 PM
Old 02-25-2007
Heck, it looks like your mirrors are simply offline. Each paragraph tells you the problem and what you need to do to bring them back on line. In this case, just run the individual metaonline commands as listed.

As to why, per the man page (man metaonline), one good reason would be to run a full backup of the system. In your backup script you'd bring the disks offline, run the backup on the down disks, and then bring them back online. They'd have to resync for your dual mirror system which might take a while depending on sizes.

If there was a problem with the backups, perhaps the disks wouldn't have been brought back online. I'd have to poke around in the scheduled scripts to see if something's bringing them down for some reason.

Carl
 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Disc Copy

Is there a disk copy utiliy for unix systems eg: I need to make a duplicate copy of a netraT1 to a netraT1 Thanks (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: SmartJuniorUnix
1 Replies

2. Filesystems, Disks and Memory

Calculating Disc Space

Ok.... Can someone please point me in the right direction. I simply want to know how to take the results of a dfspace or df command and be able to know how to determine how much disk space is either used or remaining. 1$ dfspace Filesystem 512-blocks Free %Used Iused %Iused Mounted... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: Docboyeee
5 Replies

3. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Copy of HP-UX from MO disc

This is my newbi question. I have HP-UX on a MO drive, need to backup that MO in case of damaging the original. Therefor I need a copy on server and be able to put that copy onto a blank MO to recreate a working bootable disc. This what I did. First I tried to make a copy with dd dd... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: tops
0 Replies

4. HP-UX

New MO disc format under HP Unix

How to format new MO disc under HP Unix? (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: vlad3131
1 Replies

5. Filesystems, Disks and Memory

MO disc stuck in drive, Help!

Im a newbie at unix and need some help with my MO disc, which is stuck in the MO drive. I cant get it out. I have tried several commands but nothing works, so if there is some fullproof way to get it out i would be thankful if someone could tell me! /O (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: Olink
1 Replies

6. Filesystems, Disks and Memory

New to Unix, need to copy disc using DD

Hello, I'm new to Unix :confused: , but very comfortable with computers, we have a old ScoUnix system at work and we have no IT person, although we have limited basic knowledge of commands we are by far not experts. We have called around to have someone work on this but to date have not found... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: bill306
3 Replies

7. OS X (Apple)

disc ownership permissions

Hi all, I am running OSX 10.4.11 on a G4 Sawtooth with 3 internal hard drives. Recently while setting up new user accounts for family members, I foolishly assigned 'No Access' to 2 drives other than the boot drive. Naturally, they now don't appear on the desktop. I tried to fix... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: les51
1 Replies

8. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

format disc

What is the best way to format the partition? (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: mirusnet
3 Replies

9. Solaris

Ultra 10 - Copying Files From Disc After Booting Up With Recovery Disc?

Hello, I'm still learning unix and I have what is probably a simple question but I can't seem to find the question to. I have an Ultra 10 Sparc Server running solaris 8 and the drive may have crashed (I hope not). Currently, it appears some files in the /etc folder are missing. I have a backup... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: ideffects
1 Replies

10. Linux

Disc is full - NOT! How to fix?

When I try to create a new text file on my server, via FTP, I get an error that the destination drive / disk is full. This is not true. I have at least 3-4 GB of space left. How can this be? Have not had this problem before, until today. I'm pretty new to Linux, and am therefore grateful for... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: Guldstrand
4 Replies
bup-fsck(1)						      General Commands Manual						       bup-fsck(1)

NAME
bup-fsck - verify or repair a bup repository SYNOPSIS
bup fsck [-r] [-g] [-v] [--quick] [-j jobs] [--par2-ok] [--disable-par2] [filenames...] DESCRIPTION
bup fsck is a tool for validating bup repositories in the same way that git fsck validates git repositories. It can also generate and/or use "recovery blocks" using the par2(1) tool (if you have it installed). This allows you to recover from dam- aged blocks covering up to 5% of your .pack files. In a normal backup system, damaged blocks are less important, because there tends to be enough data duplicated between backup sets that a single damaged backup set is non-critical. In a deduplicating backup system like bup, however, no block is ever stored more than once, even if it is used in every single backup. If that block were to be unrecoverable, all your backup sets would be damaged at once. Thus, it's important to be able to verify the integrity of your backups and recover from disk errors if they occur. WARNING: bup fsck's recovery features are not available unless you have the free par2(1) package installed on your bup server. WARNING: bup fsck obviously cannot recover from a complete disk failure. If your backups are important, you need to carefully consider redundancy (such as using RAID for multi-disk redundancy, or making off-site backups for site redundancy). OPTIONS
-r, --repair attempt to repair any damaged packs using existing recovery blocks. (Requires par2(1).) -g, --generate generate recovery blocks for any packs that don't already have them. (Requires par2(1).) -v, --verbose increase verbosity (can be used more than once). --quick don't run a full git verify-pack on each pack file; instead just check the final checksum. This can cause a significant speedup with no obvious decrease in reliability. However, you may want to avoid this option if you're paranoid. Has no effect on packs that already have recovery information. -j, --jobs=numjobs maximum number of pack verifications to run at a time. The optimal value for this option depends how fast your CPU can verify packs vs. your disk throughput. If you run too many jobs at once, your disk will get saturated by seeking back and forth between files and performance will actually decrease, even if numjobs is less than the number of CPU cores on your system. You can experiment with this option to find the optimal value. --par2-ok immediately return 0 if par2(1) is installed and working, or 1 otherwise. Do not actually check anything. --disable-par2 pretend that par2(1) is not installed, and ignore all recovery blocks. EXAMPLE
# generate recovery blocks for all packs that don't # have them bup fsck -g # generate recovery blocks for a particular pack bup fsck -g ~/.bup/objects/pack/153a1420cb1c8*.pack # check all packs for correctness (can be very slow!) bup fsck # check all packs for correctness and recover any # damaged ones bup fsck -r # check a particular pack for correctness and recover # it if damaged bup fsck -r ~/.bup/objects/pack/153a1420cb1c8*.pack # check if recovery blocks are available on this system if bup fsck --par2-ok; then echo "par2 is ok" fi SEE ALSO
bup-damage(1), fsck(1), git-fsck(1) BUP
Part of the bup(1) suite. AUTHORS
Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@gmail.com>. Bup unknown- bup-fsck(1)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:36 AM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy