06-05-2006
if u are using any unix machine just do "glance -c"
it will give number of Active CPU's .
But i just wanna know that how to know the Processing power of each CPU ?
Can any one help .. ??
10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting
1. HP-UX
I've got a dual CPU Itanium server that we use for hosting our Oracle database. It's been up and running fine for quite some time. So well, in fact, that I haven't even looked at 'top' in a while. Recently I needed to look at 'top' and I only see one CPU listed now. CPU0. Is there any other... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: deckard
5 Replies
2. Solaris
I have a Sun server with 4 CPUs.
How can I verify if all 4 are being used?
When I use top, it doesn't seem to break it down into 4 cpus, should it?
example:
load averages: 1.14, 1.06, 0.88; up 27+03:16:09 14:39:30
148 processes: 145 sleeping, 1 running, 2 on cpu... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: FredSmith
3 Replies
3. AIX
Hi,
I would like to know how can i get information like %user %kernel %idle etc for each cpu. Getting the infomation for the complete system cpu usage is given below but can you help me in getting each cpu information from cpu 0 to cpu n-1. Is there any kernel symbol for that and if there is how... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: uiqbal
0 Replies
4. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users
This is definitely a "stupid" question, but I can't think of anywhere else to ask it, so here goes. My knowledge of CPU history on big iron machines starts with the last DEC Alphas, a short stint with Sun servers, PA-RISC and Itanium, Intel 486s on the desktop before that, and Motorola 68000 CPUs... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: deckard
4 Replies
5. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers
I was told that there is a correspondance between the number of cpus, the load averages, and when the cpus reach 100% capacity.
I have 4 cpus and said that once the numbers hit 4.00, my CPUs are 100% at capacity. load average: 0.08, 0.09, 0.11
Is that correct?
Thank you (7 Replies)
Discussion started by: csross
7 Replies
6. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers
I am having trouble figuring this one out.....Is this a 2CPU or a 4CPU v490 with 16GB? I think it is a 2CPU system, looking for confirmation.
$ prtdiag
System Configuration: Sun Microsystems sun4u Sun Fire V490
System clock frequency: 150 MHz
Memory size: 16384 Megabytes
... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: config_boy
1 Replies
7. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users
hi,
how can asignate in a multicore processor a number of core for especific users ?
many thanks. (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: pixelmuerto
3 Replies
8. UNIX and Linux Applications
Hey all
Im looking to reduce the number of cpus available on a certain node in our cluster available for jobs using SGE.
i.e. we have one node that has 24 cpus available for jobs on SGE, i would like to reduce that to 16. Thanks (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: olifu02
1 Replies
9. AIX
Hello
If a process on a AIX system uses 0.3 CPU's, how many cpu's are needed for 100 Systems?
Regards,
Patrick (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: PatMis81
3 Replies
10. Solaris
Hello,
I have few old V210/V240, running Solaris-8. I am trying to find, number of physical CPUs, number of cores and number of virtual processors. psrinfo is giving me confusing status.
It looks like, there are 2 physical CPUs, but psrinfo -p shows me just 1
bash-2.03$ psrinfo -v
Status of... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: ron323232
4 Replies
LEARN ABOUT OPENDARWIN
rest
rest(3alleg4) Allegro manual rest(3alleg4)
NAME
rest - Waits a specified number of milliseconds or yields CPU. Allegro game programming library.
SYNOPSIS
#include <allegro.h>
void rest(unsigned int time);
DESCRIPTION
This function waits for the specified number of milliseconds.
Passing 0 as parameter will not wait, but just yield. This can be useful in order to "play nice" with other processes. Other values will
cause CPU time to be dropped on most platforms. This will look better to users, and also does things like saving battery power and making
fans less noisy.
Note that calling this inside your active game loop is a bad idea, as you never know when the OS will give you the CPU back, so you could
end up missing the vertical retrace and skipping frames. On the other hand, on multitasking operating systems it is good form to give up
the CPU for a while if you will not be using it.
SEE ALSO
install_timer(3alleg4), rest_callback(3alleg4), vsync(3alleg4), d_yield_proc(3alleg4)
Allegro version 4.4.2 rest(3alleg4)