Sponsored Content
Full Discussion: fsck -y
Special Forums Hardware Filesystems, Disks and Memory fsck -y Post 18305 by rpatrick on Tuesday 26th of March 2002 09:57:56 PM
Old 03-26-2002
fsck -y

Once in a while, I would think it advisable to run fsck -y to check the disk.
Should I sign in as su or sudo?
What is the difference and which is preferred?

Thank you in Advance!
 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Solaris

fsck

OS: Solaris 5.8 Everytime I run fsck -y I get: FILE SYSTEM STATE IN SUPERBLOCK IS WRONG; FIX? yes Do I need to run fsck with the backup superblock option or is there some other option I should use. I have tried the format->analyze->read option but that does not report any corrupt blocks.... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: run_time_error
5 Replies

2. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

fsck - what should be done?

I want to use fsck to check and repair my linux system. When I use this command, what do I need to pay attention to or what should I do to make job running successfully. Thanks for your inputs for a newbie. (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: duke0001
3 Replies

3. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Fsck ques

hy guys I got a ques I cant acess root, i tried to fsck it, but gets errors to read file systems. What steps do you take to recover the host before you see if there is any data corruption on the root drive? Regards Charneet (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: charneet
1 Replies

4. Solaris

fsck -o

Hello I am getting this in dmesg: /mount1: unexpected free inode 1262865, run fsck(1M) -o f What are the options I should use with fsck? thanks (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: melanie_pfefer
2 Replies

5. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

about fsck

i want to know what does it mean by doing a consistentcy check fsck on a disk and why journaling filesystems dont need to do it and what is meant by disk is in a consistent state when writing because entries are recorded in a journal and then to the metadata and then removed from journal (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: farhan_t49
1 Replies

6. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Fsck error

Hello I own a SPARC Ultra 10 workstation (standalone) and when issuing the fsck command I get the following output on fs C0t0d0s7: Phase 1 (checks blocks and sizes): dada warning: /pci@lf;0/pci@1, 1/ide@3/dad@0,0(dad1): ATA Transport failed:reason, `incomplete'> Uncorrectable data... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: tjwops
2 Replies

7. Solaris

unable to repair the / filesystem. Run fsck manually (fsck -F ufs /dev/rdsk/c1t0d0s0)

What can I fix this issue? I have ran below commands but everything is same.:confused: WARNING: Last shutdown is later than time on time-of-day chip: check date. The / file system (/dev/rdsk/c1t0d0s0) is being checked WARNING - unable to repair the / filesystem. Run fsck manually (fsck -F... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: getrue
4 Replies

8. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

fsck issue on /

unable to repair the / filesystem. Run fsck manually (fsck -F ufs /dev/rdsk/c1t0d0s0) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- What can I fix this issue? I have ran below commands but everything is same. WARNING: Last shutdown is later than time... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: VijayPuttu
2 Replies

9. Solaris

Fsck in vxvm

Hi, When we are running fsck in vxvm FS within few sec it will completed even if data is more than 500GB or in TB also. compare to UFS FS in that it will take more time compare with vxvm.UFS check FS in block level. & then vvxm on where its checking the FS. Please explain. (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: tiger09
1 Replies

10. Solaris

Fsck question

Dear all, solaris version -------------------- Oracle Solaris 10 9/10 s10s_u9wos_14a SPARC Copyright (c) 2010, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Assembled 11 August 2010 -bash-3.2$ uname -a SunOS nblabsvr 5.10 Generic_144488-08 sun4u sparc SUNW,SPARC-Enterprise ... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: ossupport55
5 Replies
bup-fsck(1)						      General Commands Manual						       bup-fsck(1)

NAME
bup-fsck - verify or repair a bup repository SYNOPSIS
bup fsck [-r] [-g] [-v] [--quick] [-j jobs] [--par2-ok] [--disable-par2] [filenames...] DESCRIPTION
bup fsck is a tool for validating bup repositories in the same way that git fsck validates git repositories. It can also generate and/or use "recovery blocks" using the par2(1) tool (if you have it installed). This allows you to recover from dam- aged blocks covering up to 5% of your .pack files. In a normal backup system, damaged blocks are less important, because there tends to be enough data duplicated between backup sets that a single damaged backup set is non-critical. In a deduplicating backup system like bup, however, no block is ever stored more than once, even if it is used in every single backup. If that block were to be unrecoverable, all your backup sets would be damaged at once. Thus, it's important to be able to verify the integrity of your backups and recover from disk errors if they occur. WARNING: bup fsck's recovery features are not available unless you have the free par2(1) package installed on your bup server. WARNING: bup fsck obviously cannot recover from a complete disk failure. If your backups are important, you need to carefully consider redundancy (such as using RAID for multi-disk redundancy, or making off-site backups for site redundancy). OPTIONS
-r, --repair attempt to repair any damaged packs using existing recovery blocks. (Requires par2(1).) -g, --generate generate recovery blocks for any packs that don't already have them. (Requires par2(1).) -v, --verbose increase verbosity (can be used more than once). --quick don't run a full git verify-pack on each pack file; instead just check the final checksum. This can cause a significant speedup with no obvious decrease in reliability. However, you may want to avoid this option if you're paranoid. Has no effect on packs that already have recovery information. -j, --jobs=numjobs maximum number of pack verifications to run at a time. The optimal value for this option depends how fast your CPU can verify packs vs. your disk throughput. If you run too many jobs at once, your disk will get saturated by seeking back and forth between files and performance will actually decrease, even if numjobs is less than the number of CPU cores on your system. You can experiment with this option to find the optimal value. --par2-ok immediately return 0 if par2(1) is installed and working, or 1 otherwise. Do not actually check anything. --disable-par2 pretend that par2(1) is not installed, and ignore all recovery blocks. EXAMPLE
# generate recovery blocks for all packs that don't # have them bup fsck -g # generate recovery blocks for a particular pack bup fsck -g ~/.bup/objects/pack/153a1420cb1c8*.pack # check all packs for correctness (can be very slow!) bup fsck # check all packs for correctness and recover any # damaged ones bup fsck -r # check a particular pack for correctness and recover # it if damaged bup fsck -r ~/.bup/objects/pack/153a1420cb1c8*.pack # check if recovery blocks are available on this system if bup fsck --par2-ok; then echo "par2 is ok" fi SEE ALSO
bup-damage(1), fsck(1), git-fsck(1) BUP
Part of the bup(1) suite. AUTHORS
Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@gmail.com>. Bup unknown- bup-fsck(1)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:06 AM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy