Routing issue - local vs LAN


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Top Forums UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers Routing issue - local vs LAN
# 8  
Old 03-03-2012
They're going to want you to post your configuration too...
 
Login or Register to Ask a Question

Previous Thread | Next Thread

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Cybersecurity

iptables Local Lan Issues

I recently installed Centos 6 and is my SOHO firewall/router. The small network is layout like such: |--eth0(WAN) Centos 6(firewall/router) |---eth1(LAN) | Switch | | LAN(192.168.3.0/27) | | PCs ----Laptops---Printer... (8 Replies)
Discussion started by: metallica1973
8 Replies

2. Solaris

Routing Issue

we are not able to ping client server (falcon-ebr.sbms.bsc.com) from netbackup master server (135.179.96.122 tsprd-ebr.edc.single.net) However from client server we are able to ping the master Server. Please assist on this (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: Rahul466
1 Replies

3. IP Networking

Routing traffic problem between 3G and Office Lan Network

Hi, I would like to ask some networking solution regarding my work LAN and 3G usb network problem. I want to route my internet traffic to the 3G network and sometimes connect to some of my work network for ssh to configure some workstation or print something. Currently my problem is i can't... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: jao_madn
0 Replies

4. IP Networking

Local Lan, no-ip directed DNS forward, surf within lan

Hi, We have a website running on a local centos 5.4 surfer, static IP. The domain.com uses no-ip.com to take care of the DNS, it forwards all to my server. My router receives the port 80 call, routes it to my server and the world can see domain.com perfectly fine. However, we cannot see... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: lawstudent
3 Replies

5. IP Networking

Ubuntu LAN connectivity issue

System: Dell Desktop w/ 2 SATA drives running Ubuntu 9.10 that uses 2 ethernet cards, 1 for internet connectivity and another to interface the machine with a high voltage power supply which supports ssh and EPICS controls. Second Ethernet card is connected to a NetGear WNR3500 router, the VME... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: henslewm
0 Replies

6. IP Networking

Need help with a routing issue.

I have run into a wall troubleshooting a Centos 5 networking issue. Hoping someone can assist. I've got a box with two vlans trunked over bond0 bond0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:22:64:C1:D6:60 inet6 addr: fe80::222:64ff:fec1:d660/64 Scope:Link ... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: creedog
0 Replies

7. Solaris

Lan Issue

Hi Mates, I have one problem connecting a solaris machine to winxp machine. Setup:- Solaris 10 OS Virtual machine - on VMWARE (Ip Address:- 192.168.10.3). WINXP SP2 is the base os. (Ip Address:- 192.168.10.2). Bothe machines are connected using a bridge networking VMnet1. When i ping... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: satyajeet.kadam
1 Replies

8. IP Networking

IP - Routing issue?

I have an IP routing issue or I am just to stupid to work it out myself. I have setup am old PC running SUSE Linux 11.3 as a router, the system has 3 Interfaces connecting 3 networks. Interface 1 = 10.164.2.161/21 Interface 2 = 192.168.1.210/24 Interface 3 = 30.1.0.11/16 The default... (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: hogola
6 Replies

9. AIX

AIX Routing Issue

Hello, I've moved to a new network with multiple AIX box's. Most of them are working fine and dandy. On one box I need to set up a static route to a gateway.. no problem right? Whenever I add the route it appears in the routing table as UGc and then begins adding new entries to the... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: joshstar14
1 Replies

10. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Routing between two LAN

Here's the problem. I got one network with a internett connection (2mbit). In this network there's 5 computers connected together with a hub. The other network is also with 5 computers. I'm just wondering if I could connect these networks together. But the one network should not get access to the... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: Dark_Duck
1 Replies
Login or Register to Ask a Question
CARP(4) 						   BSD Kernel Interfaces Manual 						   CARP(4)

NAME
carp -- Common Address Redundancy Protocol SYNOPSIS
pseudo-device carp [count] DESCRIPTION
The carp interface is a pseudo-device which implements and controls the CARP protocol. carp allows multiple hosts on the same local network to share a set of IP addresses. Its primary purpose is to ensure that these addresses are always available, but in some configurations carp can also provide load balancing functionality. A carp interface can be created at runtime using the ifconfig carpN create command. To use carp, the administrator needs to configure at minimum a common virtual host ID and virtual host IP address on each machine which is to take part in the virtual group. Additional parameters can also be set on a per-interface basis: advbase and advskew, which are used to con- trol how frequently the host sends advertisements when it is the master for a virtual host, and pass which is used to authenticate carp advertisements. Finally carpdev is used to specify which interface the carp device attaches to. If unspecified, the kernel attempts to set carpdev by looking for another interface with the same subnet. These configurations can be done using ifconfig(8), or through the SIOCSVH ioctl. Additionally, there are a number of global parameters which can be set using sysctl(8): net.inet.carp.allow Accept incoming carp packets. Enabled by default. net.inet.carp.preempt Allow virtual hosts to preempt each other. It is also used to failover carp interfaces as a group. When the option is enabled and one of the carp enabled physical interfaces goes down, advskew is changed to 240 on all carp interfaces. See also the first example. Disabled by default. net.inet.carp.log Log bad carp packets. Disabled by default. net.inet.carp.arpbalance Balance local traffic using ARP. Disabled by default. EXAMPLES
For firewalls and routers with multiple interfaces, it is desirable to failover all of the carp interfaces together, when one of the physical interfaces goes down. This is achieved by the preempt option. Enable it on both host A and B: # sysctl -w net.inet.carp.preempt=1 Assume that host A is the preferred master and 192.168.1.x/24 is configured on one physical interface and 192.168.2.y/24 on another. This is the setup for host A: # ifconfig carp0 create # ifconfig carp0 vhid 1 pass mekmitasdigoat 192.168.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 # ifconfig carp1 create # ifconfig carp1 vhid 2 pass mekmitasdigoat 192.168.2.1/24 netmask 255.255.255.0 The setup for host B is identical, but it has a higher advskew: # ifconfig carp0 create # ifconfig carp0 vhid 1 advskew 100 pass mekmitasdigoat 192.168.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 # ifconfig carp1 create # ifconfig carp1 vhid 2 advskew 100 pass mekmitasdigoat 192.168.2.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 Because of the preempt option, when one of the physical interfaces of host A fails, advskew is adjusted to 240 on all its carp interfaces. This will cause host B to preempt on both interfaces instead of just the failed one. In order to set up an ARP balanced virtual host, it is necessary to configure one virtual host for each physical host which would respond to ARP requests and thus handle the traffic. In the following example, two virtual hosts are configured on two hosts to provide balancing and failover for the IP address 192.168.1.10. First the carp interfaces on Host A are configured. The advskew of 100 on the second virtual host means that its advertisements will be sent out slightly less frequently. # ifconfig carp0 create # ifconfig carp0 vhid 1 pass mekmitasdigoat 192.168.1.10 netmask 255.255.255.0 # ifconfig carp1 create # ifconfig carp1 vhid 2 advskew 100 pass mekmitasdigoat 192.168.1.10 netmask 255.255.255.0 The configuration for host B is identical, except the skew is on virtual host 1 rather than virtual host 2. # ifconfig carp0 create # ifconfig carp0 vhid 1 advskew 100 pass mekmitasdigoat 192.168.1.10 netmask 255.255.255.0 # ifconfig carp1 create # ifconfig carp1 vhid 2 pass mekmitasdigoat 192.168.1.10 netmask 255.255.255.0 Finally, the ARP balancing feature must be enabled on both hosts: # sysctl -w net.inet.carp.arpbalance=1 When the hosts receive an ARP request for 192.168.1.10, the source IP address of the request is used to compute which virtual host should answer the request. The host which is master of the selected virtual host will reply to the request, the other(s) will ignore it. This way, locally connected systems will receive different ARP replies and subsequent IP traffic will be balanced among the hosts. If one of the hosts fails, the other will take over the virtual MAC address, and begin answering ARP requests on its behalf. Note: ARP balancing only works on the local network segment. It cannot balance traffic that crosses a router, because the router itself will always be balanced to the same virtual host. SEE ALSO
netstat(1), sysctl(3), arp(4), arp(8), ifconfig(8), sysctl(8) HISTORY
The carp device first appeared in OpenBSD 3.5. BSD
October 16, 2003 BSD