Flock 1.1 offers nectar for social butterflies


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Special Forums News, Links, Events and Announcements UNIX and Linux RSS News Flock 1.1 offers nectar for social butterflies
# 1  
Old 04-11-2008
Flock 1.1 offers nectar for social butterflies

Fri, 11 Apr 2008 08:00:00 GMT
When we looked at Flock 0.9 last year, the social Web browser showed a lot of potential. Now that it's over the 1.0 hump, the Flock team has made good on the application's promise. Maybe too good -- while Flock serves up a lot of content on a single page, you practically need super-powers to take it all in. Once you cut back on the sensory input a bit though, it's a pretty slick Firefox alternative for anyone with a ton of cyber friends.


Source...
Login or Register to Ask a Question

Previous Thread | Next Thread

5 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Shell Programming and Scripting

Flock preventing function to work

Hi i have a script that check pings and i use flock to so the script wont run multipul times : its not the whole script but this is the idea : ( flock -x -w 3 200 || exit 1 /usr/sbin/fping -c$count -i$interval -a $hosts > $FILE1 2>&1 ) 200>/var/lock/.myscript.exclusivelock now i... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: batchenr
4 Replies

2. Shell Programming and Scripting

Use of flock command for whole script

I'm changing my mindset from a few big processes moving data from a few sources under an external, dependency-based scheduler to multiple processes moving data from many sources run by each client cron and possibly interfering with each other. It has the benefits of more granular code but I'm... (11 Replies)
Discussion started by: rbatte1
11 Replies

3. Shell Programming and Scripting

Help using Flock (file lock)

Hello, I have been working on using "flock"/file lock to prevent two instances of a bash script from being executed. Below is a simplified version of what I have to illustrate the flock part. It works as it is set up there below however the piece I am trying to figure out is how to get it to... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: infrared013
2 Replies

4. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

Semaphore - lockfile/flock

Hi, I have a process which can run one instance at a time. Currently we have multiple scripts trying to kickoff this process. I wanted to implement the semaphore mechanism to achieve this. I was going through few examples. The below code seems to be reasonable solution. ... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: tostay2003
5 Replies

5. Web Development

MySQL: Random offers for every airport

I need to write a MySQL query where it loops through every airport and generates 10 random offers (my offers table is 990,000+ rows) The code I have below works for 1 airport, but as soon as it gets bigger it slows RIGHT down. This is using PHP/MySQL At the moment it takes well over a... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: worchyld
2 Replies
Login or Register to Ask a Question
FLOCK(2)						      BSD System Calls Manual							  FLOCK(2)

NAME
flock -- apply or remove an advisory lock on an open file SYNOPSIS
#include <sys/file.h> #define LOCK_SH 1 /* shared lock */ #define LOCK_EX 2 /* exclusive lock */ #define LOCK_NB 4 /* don't block when locking */ #define LOCK_UN 8 /* unlock */ int flock(int fd, int operation); DESCRIPTION
Flock() applies or removes an advisory lock on the file associated with the file descriptor fd. A lock is applied by specifying an operation parameter that is one of LOCK_SH or LOCK_EX with the optional addition of LOCK_NB. To unlock an existing lock operation should be LOCK_UN. Advisory locks allow cooperating processes to perform consistent operations on files, but do not guarantee consistency (i.e., processes may still access files without using advisory locks possibly resulting in inconsistencies). The locking mechanism allows two types of locks: shared locks and exclusive locks. At any time multiple shared locks may be applied to a file, but at no time are multiple exclusive, or both shared and exclusive, locks allowed simultaneously on a file. A shared lock may be upgraded to an exclusive lock, and vice versa, simply by specifying the appropriate lock type; this results in the pre- vious lock being released and the new lock applied (possibly after other processes have gained and released the lock). Requesting a lock on an object that is already locked normally causes the caller to be blocked until the lock may be acquired. If LOCK_NB is included in operation, then this will not happen; instead the call will fail and the error EWOULDBLOCK will be returned. NOTES
Locks are on files, not file descriptors. That is, file descriptors duplicated through dup(2) or fork(2) do not result in multiple instances of a lock, but rather multiple references to a single lock. If a process holding a lock on a file forks and the child explicitly unlocks the file, the parent will lose its lock. Processes blocked awaiting a lock may be awakened by signals. RETURN VALUES
Zero is returned if the operation was successful; on an error a -1 is returned and an error code is left in the global location errno. ERRORS
The flock() call fails if: [EWOULDBLOCK] The file is locked and the LOCK_NB option was specified. [EBADF] The argument fd is an invalid descriptor. [EINVAL] The argument fd refers to an object other than a file. [EOPNOTSUPP] The referenced descriptor is not of the correct type. SEE ALSO
open(2), close(2), dup(2), execve(2), fork(2) HISTORY
The flock() function call appeared in 4.2BSD. 4.2 Berkeley Distribution December 11, 1993 4.2 Berkeley Distribution