Use LiveUpgrade to Migrate from UFS to ZFS with Minimal Downtime


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Operating Systems Solaris Solaris BigAdmin RSS Use LiveUpgrade to Migrate from UFS to ZFS with Minimal Downtime
# 1  
Old 08-07-2009
Use LiveUpgrade to Migrate from UFS to ZFS with Minimal Downtime

Blog that describes how to migrate a Solaris 10 UFS file system to ZFS. LiveUpgrade handles the migration of the critical file systems, and this blog describes how to manually migrate three other file systems from UFS to ZFS using ufsdump and ufsrestore to minimize downtime.

More...
Login or Register to Ask a Question

Previous Thread | Next Thread

7 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Solaris

Using liveupgrade on single ZFS pool

Hi Guys, I have a single ZFS pool with 2 disk which is mirrored if i create a new BE with lucreate should i specify which disk where the new BE should be created? (7 Replies)
Discussion started by: batas
7 Replies

2. Solaris

Mount ufs in ZFS system

Hi..I have installed Solaris 5.10 update 9 with ZFS system with RAID1. It is to be integrated with SAN which is UFS and . It is getting mounted but when i am rebooting server,it is getting removed from system. Pls let me know what all step need to follow for this. Thanks !! (15 Replies)
Discussion started by: deljatt
15 Replies

3. Solaris

Convert root UFS to ZFS on x86 solaris 10/09

Hello All, Good Morning, We are trying to convert the UFS root in to ZFS. Am getting below error. Any one help me out on this ? bash-3.00# zpool list NAME SIZE USED AVAIL CAP HEALTH ALTROOT guru 5.95G 483M 5.48G 7% ONLINE - bash-3.00# zpool create rpool c2t10d0p0... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: gowthamakanthan
4 Replies

4. Solaris

Allocating space to ufs /usr by using ZFS in solaris

Hi, Im currently having my diskspace allocation of my UFS filesystem in solris as 100% for /usr directory.I have created a zfs pool of 3 gb.I want to allocate space from my zfs pool to /usr so that i can free space in /usr.Please help me it is quiet urgent. (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: navjotmannan
6 Replies

5. Solaris

Installing ZFS on an existing Solaris 10 install (UFS)

Hello, I am new to Solaris so i apologize upfront if my questions seem trivial. I am trying to install a ZFS file system on a Solaris 10 machine with UFS already installed on it. I want to run: # zpool create pool_zfs c0t0d0 then: # zfs create pool_zfs/fs My question is more to... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: mcdef
3 Replies

6. Solaris

Can you migrate UFS to ZFS ?

I have some UFS volumes (non root), that I would like to change into ZFS volumes. Is this possible ? I think the only method is to create a new zfs volume and copy the data accoss, this would take a long time for us. Is there a quicker way ? Regards (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: wjones
5 Replies

7. BSD

ZFS / UFS / Soft Updates / GJurnal / Bonnie Performance

I have done some tests with UFS/ZFS under bonnie benchmark. here are the results if you are interested. software: OS: FreeBSD 7-CURRENT 200708 snapshot benchmark: bonnie -s 2048 CFLAGS: -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -s CPUTYPE: athlon-mp scheduler: ULE hardware: CPU: (single) Athlon... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: vermaden
0 Replies
Login or Register to Ask a Question
ORLite::Migrate(3pm)					User Contributed Perl Documentation				      ORLite::Migrate(3pm)

NAME
ORLite::Migrate - Extremely light weight SQLite-specific schema migration SYNOPSIS
# Build your ORM class using a patch timeline # stored in the shared files directory. use ORLite::Migrate { create => 1, file => 'sqlite.db', timeline => File::Spec->catdir( File::ShareDir::module_dir('My::Module'), 'patches', ), user_version => 8, }; # migrate-1.pl - A trivial schema patch #!/usr/bin/perl use strict; use DBI (); # Locate the SQLite database my $file = <STDIN>; chomp($file); unless ( -f $file and -w $file ) { die "SQLite file $file does not exist"; } # Connect to the SQLite database my $dbh = DBI->connect("dbi:SQLite(RaiseError=>1):$file"); unless ( $dbh ) { die "Failed to connect to $file"; } $dbh->do( <<'END_SQL' ); create table foo ( id integer not null primary key, name varchar(32) not null ) END_SQL DESCRIPTION
SQLite is a light weight single file SQL database that provides an excellent platform for embedded storage of structured data. ORLite is a light weight single class Object-Relational Mapper (ORM) system specifically designed for (and limited to only) work with SQLite. ORLite::Migrate is a light weight single class Database Schema Migration enhancement for ORLite. It provides a simple implementation of schema versioning within the SQLite database using the built-in "user_version" pragma (which is set to zero by default). When setting up the ORM class, an additional "timeline" parameter is provided, which should be either a monolithic timeline class, or a directory containing standalone migration scripts. A "timeline" is a set of revisioned schema changed, to be applied in order and representing the evolution of the database schema over time. The end of the timeline, representing by the highest revision number, represents the "current" anticipated schema for the application. Because the patch sequence can be calculated from any arbitrary starting version, by keeping the historical set of changes in your application as schema patches it is possible for the user of any older application version to install the most current version of an application and have their database upgraded smoothly and safely. The recommended location to store the migration timeline is a shared files directory, locatable using one of the functions from File::ShareDir. The timeline for your application can be specified in two different forms, with different advantages and disadvantages. Timeline Directories A Timeline Directory is a directory on the filesystem containing a set of Perl scripts named in a consistent pattern. These patch scripts are named in the form migrate-$version.pl, where $version is the schema version to migrate to. A typical timeline directory will look something like the following. migrate-01.pl migrate-02.pl migrate-03.pl migrate-04.pl migrate-05.pl migrate-06.pl migrate-07.pl migrate-08.pl migrate-09.pl migrate-10.pl ORLite::Migrate formulates a migration plan that starts at the current database "user_version" pragma value, executing the migration script that has the version "user_version + 1", then executing "user_version + 2" and so on. It will continue stepping forwards until it runs out of patches to execute. The main advantage of a timeline directory is that each patch is run in its own process and interpreter. Hundreds of patches can be produced by many different authors, with certainty that the changes described in each will be executed as intended. The main disadvantage of using a timeline directory is that your application must be able to identify the Perl interpreter it is run in so that it can execute a sub-process. This may be difficult or impossible for cases such as PAR-packaged applications and Perl interpreters embedded inside .exe wrappers or larger non-Perl applications. In general, it is recommended that you use the timeline directory approach unless you encounter a situation in which sub-process execution (or locating the patch files) is difficult. Timeline Classes A timeline class places all of the schema patches into a single Perl module, with each patch represented as a method name. The following is an example of a trivial timeline class. package t::lib::MyTimeline; use strict; use base 'ORLite::Migrate::Timeline'; my $UPGRADE1 = <<'END_SQL'; create table foo ( id integer not null primary key, name varchar(32) not null ); insert into foo values ( 1, 'foo' ) END_SQL sub upgrade1 { my $self = shift; foreach ( split /;s+/, $UPGRADE1 ) { $self->do($_); } return 1; } sub upgrade2 { $_[0]->do("insert into foo values ( 2, 'bar' )"); } sub upgrade3 { $_[0]->do("insert into foo values ( 3, 'baz' )"); } 1; As with the patch files, the current state of the "user_version" pragma will be examined, and each "upgradeN" method will be called to advance the schema forwards. The main advantage of a timeline class is that you will not need to execute sub-processes, and so a timeline class will continue to function even in unusual or exotic process contents such as PAR packaging or .exe wrappers. The main disadvantage of a timeline class is that the entire timeline code must be loaded into memory no matter how many patch steps are needed (and stay in memory after the migration has completed), and all patches share a common interpreter and thus can potentially pollute or corrupt each other. SUPPORT
Bugs should be reported via the CPAN bug tracker at http://rt.cpan.org/NoAuth/ReportBug.html?Queue=ORLite-Migrate <http://rt.cpan.org/NoAuth/ReportBug.html?Queue=ORLite-Migrate> For other issues, contact the author. AUTHOR
Adam Kennedy <adamk@cpan.org> COPYRIGHT
Copyright 2009 - 2012 Adam Kennedy. This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the same terms as Perl itself. The full text of the license can be found in the LICENSE file included with this module. perl v5.14.2 2012-02-02 ORLite::Migrate(3pm)