Comments on "How Will the World End?"


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Contact Us Post Here to Contact Site Administrators and Moderators Comments on "How Will the World End?"
# 1  
Old 08-29-2011
Comments on "How Will the World End?"

I have read the sun-expansion scenario numerous places but I've never read any suggestion that the earth's orbit would increase to avoid being scorched. What mechanism would push it out?

As for creating a black hole by the LHC, the whole concept is silly so any number of reasons would rule it out, but it still counts as something that was proposed that would destroy the earth, not just people.

Quote:
Originally Posted by wabard
There is a proponent of the "Variable Speed of Light" (Magueijo), which I think results in a non-accelerating universe. If this is true, then the "great crunch" may be possible.
Ah! I hope no one minds segueing away from the topic for a moment.

I read Joao Magueijo's book and found it both fascinated and disturbing.
Moderator's Comments:
Mod Comment Edited per forum customs and guidelines


But on the other hand, Magueijo reveals something disturbing about the scientific community. When he suggests the very notion that the speed of light might not be a fundamental, bedrock, constitutional constant of the universe, scientists of all stripe summarily reject him. Or they turn around and run.

This is a religious reaction. He has revealed that many scientists of today hold to a religious belief that they are not willing to even discuss alternatives to.

It's not the end of the world, so to speak, but I found that revelation shocking.

Moderator's Comments:
Mod Comment Neo: I would like to remind all posters that this is not a religious discussion. Religious comments will be moderated.


---------- Post updated at 12:10 PM ---------- Previous update was at 10:32 AM ----------

Comment to Moderator:

I don't see anything in the rules that would suggest my deleted statement shouldn't be a very appropriate part of this discussion. It was needed to balance the "but on the other hand" statement that followed. It was a historical statement and my opinion of it's implication. It was positive and it didn't even counter anything any other participant said. It's also offensive that my good and honest opinion should be rubbed out like profanity.

BTW, the very concept of the End of the World is a religious concept. It's impossible to discuss it without it being a religious discussion whether you quote any religious leaders or not. But what could possibly be wrong with that?

There's been no arrogance, shouting or name calling in this thread that I can see. But the censorship casts a negative shadow on the forum.
# 2  
Old 08-29-2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by KenJackson
BTW, the very concept of the End of the World is a religious concept. It's impossible to discuss it without it being a religious discussion whether you quote any religious leaders or not.
No, it is not.

The concept of the world ending, as per this thread and poll, is purely scientific. There is nothing religious in the thread.

... and, as the very long standing custom and culture of this site, religious discussions are not permitted.

These forums are for technical and scientific discussions and the question about "the world ending" is purely scientific and technical; religious posts and comments will be deleted.
# 3  
Old 08-29-2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by KenJackson
There's been no arrogance, shouting or name calling in this thread that I can see. But the censorship casts a negative shadow on the forum.
Actually, the reason you don't see any "name calling" or other negative posts is because they have been promptly deleted by moderators.
# 4  
Old 08-29-2011
FWIW, Here is a forum blog post from Oct 2010, We Run a Tight, but Very Effective, Ship.

Quote:
One thing we can all notice, the number of forums on the net continues to rise. I don’t see a reversal of this trend. Every new technology brings a new opportunity to establish a community. Some communities have a long life span, other have a shorter one. This is all part of the natural life cycle of the net, which is good and bad, but mostly good.

The UNIX and Linux Forums are certainly not the largest, but we are absolutely one of the oldest and better established forums. We run a very tight ship. Running a tight ship is both good and bad. Some forums don’t run a tight ship. They have a lot of gossip and a lot of chit-chat; and those forums have a much higher number of posts than we do. Our goals was never to be the biggest, or have the most people, or to have the most threads or post. Our goals have always been to be a useful knowledge repository and have a very high signal-to-noise ratio (SNR).

SNR is an engineering term; but it means a lot in social and educational networks and forums. If you are looking for knowledge or a solution to a difficult problem, you don’t want to have to read a bunch of chit-chat or endless religious discussions and arguments. You want facts. At the end of the day, everyone needs to leave work and go home to friends and family. Our goals are to get you home faster and help you solve your problems at work or wherever your challenges may exist.

We seem to be doing OK. We serve 3 to 4 million pages of useful information a month to over 2 million people, just like you (and me), who want to solve a problem at work and go home to their families. We have great moderators and many strong contributors. Everyone is free to interact in the community, but only in a professional, considerate way. Our SNR is very high. In fact, our SNR is just about as high as possible; thanks to people, just like you, who follow the guidelines and our moderators who work to make sure those who forget, remember. We learn by teaching. Everyone learns from each other. Even the expert learns from the novice.

Running a tight ship means true freedom. Everyone is free to post and not be bullied, as long as they show respect to the rest of the community and follow a few simple guidelines. In order to have freedom, the rights of the individual to express themselves must not be compromised, as long as the person expressing themselves does not infringe upon the rights of others.

There are many forums and communities on the net. We don’t claim to be the best and we have no ambition to be the largest or the biggest. We simply want to insure that all people who are interested in Linux and Unix-based systems can interact with each other, at all age, skill and experience levels. We are not interested in “what distribution is better or worse”. We are interested in solving problems and helping everyone be more productive, without concern about what flavor of UNIX or Linux we happen to be using that day, week, month or year.

As always, thank you for contributing to The UNIX and Linux Forums.
These 2 Users Gave Thanks to Neo For This Post:
# 5  
Old 08-29-2011
Neo, you're being inconsistent.
But to try to introduce a modicum of consistency, please delete the word "Religious" from "Crazy people unleash a deady Virus (Politics, Religion)" (and correct the spelling of "deadly"), and "Spiritual" from "Other (Personal, Spiritual)".
# 6  
Old 08-29-2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by KenJackson
Neo, you're being inconsistent.
But to try to introduce a modicum of consistency, please delete the word "Religious" from "Crazy people unleash a deady Virus (Politics, Religion)" (and correct the spelling of "deadly"), and "Spiritual" from "Other (Personal, Spiritual)".
OK. Deleted.
# 7  
Old 08-29-2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by Neo
FWIW, Here is a forum blog post from Oct 2010, We Run a Tight, but Very Effective, Ship.
I appreciate your tight ship very much, Neo. I like this forum. And I suppose you are tiring of this part of the discussion.

But the particular statement that was deleted above was in no way a violation your tight ship policy. It did not in any way disrespect, disparage or trample the rights of anyone else. Also, the deletion violates this paragraph that you quoted above:
Quote:
Running a tight ship means true freedom. Everyone is free to post and not be bullied, as long as they show respect to the rest of the community and follow a few simple guidelines. In order to have freedom, the rights of the individual to express themselves must not be compromised, as long as the person expressing themselves does not infringe upon the rights of others.
I'm not advocating purely religious discussions here, but all topics of discussion bump into religion. I know some people get vicious when anything of a remotely religious nature is mentioned. But it is their comments that should be deleted, not the good.

I encourage you to run a good and fair tight ship, not a mean tight ship.
Login or Register to Ask a Question

Previous Thread | Next Thread

7 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Shell Programming and Scripting

Bash script - Print an ascii file using specific font "Latin Modern Mono 12" "regular" "9"

Hello. System : opensuse leap 42.3 I have a bash script that build a text file. I would like the last command doing : print_cmd -o page-left=43 -o page-right=22 -o page-top=28 -o page-bottom=43 -o font=LatinModernMono12:regular:9 some_file.txt where : print_cmd ::= some printing... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: jcdole
1 Replies

2. Shell Programming and Scripting

Removing "^M" from the end of a String (i.e. "Ctrl+M")?

Hello All, I have an Expect script that ssh's to a remote server and runs some commands before exiting. One of the commands I run is the "hostname" Command. After I run this command I save the output using this line in the code below... Basically it executes the hostname command, then I... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: mrm5102
2 Replies

3. Programming

Exact meaning of the "world" in "hello world"

Hello! I have a question to native English-speaking people. In the popular program's "hello world" greeting, what meaning the "world" has: "all", "everybody", "people", "friends" or "whole world", "planet", "Earth", "Universe"? In other words, to whom this greeting is addressed: to the... (14 Replies)
Discussion started by: Eugene Muzychen
14 Replies

4. Shell Programming and Scripting

Purpose of "read" and "$END$" in ksh ?

Hi, Could anyone please shed some light on the following script lines and what is it doing as it was written by an ex-administrator? cat $AMS/version|read a b verno d DBVer=$(/usr/bin/printf "%7s" $verno) I checked that the cat $AMS/version command returns following output: ... (10 Replies)
Discussion started by: dbadmin100
10 Replies

5. Shell Programming and Scripting

awk command to replace ";" with "|" and ""|" at diferent places in line of file

Hi, I have line in input file as below: 3G_CENTRAL;INDONESIA_(M)_TELKOMSEL;SPECIAL_WORLD_GRP_7_FA_2_TELKOMSEL My expected output for line in the file must be : "1-Radon1-cMOC_deg"|"LDIndex"|"3G_CENTRAL|INDONESIA_(M)_TELKOMSEL"|LAST|"SPECIAL_WORLD_GRP_7_FA_2_TELKOMSEL" Can someone... (7 Replies)
Discussion started by: shis100
7 Replies

6. Shell Programming and Scripting

Use "read" with a text file with comments

Hi, I read a .txt file with read command. while read PC USER PASS SHARE EXCL do ... done The file is like this: pc1 usr pc01 parts pc2 usr pc02 parts nobackup pc3 usr pc03 parts pc4 usr pc04 parts pc10 usr pc10 parts nobackup pc13 usr pc13 share,share_2 noshare,noshare_2But if I want... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: mbarberis
3 Replies

7. Programming

Couldn't compile the simple "Hello World"

So, this is my first C++ program under linux. My OS is Red Hat 8.0, and my codes are like following: $vi hello.cpp #include <iostream> using namespace std; int main() { cout << "Hello World!" << endl; return 0; } $ g++ -o hello hello.cpp the error message are: ... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: HOUSCOUS
3 Replies
Login or Register to Ask a Question