Question about HACMP for active-active mode

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Operating Systems AIX Question about HACMP for active-active mode
# 8  
Old 10-28-2009
I hardly can think of a scenario where an autoreboot would fix the problem ?
If you have a failing network - reboot doesnt help - neither with failing storage. And even on a failed application - like i.e. a database - a reboot would would only help if someone would have solved the root cause of the failing (that is btw true for auto-failover of a DB - it might not be a good idea at all). If your node fails due to overcommitted memory, the reboot might clear the caches - but the fact that you don't have enough memory or bad tunables would remain, the problem re-occurs soon.
Kind regards
# 9  
Old 10-29-2009
Originally Posted by qiulang
BTW my original question was "what is the benefit of running HACMP for [...]
It seems to me like your real problem is adapting to the terminology of HACMP, in this case namely the term "resource group".

Suppose the classical case with no HACMP involved: you have a system where an application runs. The application has some disks holding its data and the data are all in a volume group. Further you have some network adapter (an IP adress) over which the users know they can contact the application.

Now lets abstract from this concept: what do we need to transfer to another system to transfer the task of serving the application? Answer: the volume group with the data, the IP adress the users expect, some start/stop mechanisms for the application - thats it. Exactly this is what is called a resource group. It is a data structure inside the HACMP configuration which binds together exactly these things.

Resource groups always reside on one node of a cluster and can be transferred to another node in case the active node dies. This is what shockneck has tried to explain to you in the active-active configuration: suppose your default would be a node A with some resource group A' operative and a node B with a RG B' operative. If node A dies, RG A' is being transferred to node B which will run both, vice versa, if node B dies.

Yes, "mutual takeover" is just another name for this mechanism. But however you call it, it helps to picture the RGs moving around on the nodes in case of hardware outages.

I hope this helps.

# 10  
Old 10-30-2009
Thanks for the answer.

Actually what I did not understand before was what was the value of running 2 instances of the same application on one node during the failover? If the resource group contains the same application on both nodes, why not just make takeover not happen here ? Because from the client point of view, the service still exists while running two same instances on one node may make the node overloaded.

As zxmaus pointed out that two same instances can server different purposes(say, database 1 is used for trading, database 2 for reporting). I think that makes sense. But if two instances serve the same purpose I still don't see the value in it.
Login or Register to Ask a Question

Previous Thread | Next Thread

8 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Solaris

VCS not active

Dear All, My current system run Solaris 9 SPARC 64 bit , and VXVM , VCS 4.1. I check all the node information . ls -l /etc/vx/*.exclude /etc/vx/*.exclude: No such file or directory root@devuardbs01 # vxdctl license All features are available: Mirroring Root Mirroring Concatenation... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: linux_user
0 Replies

2. Shell Programming and Scripting

How do I calculate total number of active and non active hosts?

#!/bin/bash for digit in $(seq 1 10) do if ping -c1 -w2 192.168.1.$digit &> /dev/null then echo "192.168.1.$digit is UP" else echo "192.168.1.$digit is DOWN" fi done (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: fusetrips
3 Replies

3. Linux

active mode ftp connection from linux

Hi, We have one java client which connects to a windows server through ftp in active mode and gets files. When we run this client on hp-ux, it is able to transfer 100k files. But when we run the same client on Linux server it is able to transfer only 200 files at max and it is hanging there... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: urspradeep330
1 Replies

4. Solaris

Port Active?

Hi, I have recently installed autosys R11 on my a container in solaris 10. the container has solaris 10. I am now trying to configure the autosys workload contol center on a windows VM. but i can not get the contol center to log into the the autosys server. when i try to estiblish a... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: dshakey
4 Replies

5. Solaris

Link based Active Active IPMP

Hi, I need to configure 4 ip address (same subnet and mask) in one ipmp group (two interfaces) in an active active formation (link based). Can some one provide the steps or a tutorial link. Thanks (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: Mack1982
2 Replies

6. AIX

AIX HACMP Active/Passive Config

I have a HACMP 6.1 configured in a active/passive. I have 1 NIC with 3 IP address on (Boot, Persistent and Service ) . All address are routable. One of the application on the HA cluster is also using Boot Ip to send application data. Question : Since all the traffic is passing thru the same... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: mk8570
3 Replies

7. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

active working

hi! i want to create a list of the active working of the system classified by size and run the list on the monitor in a contolled pattern.Every active work has to appear only once. Any suggestions? also how can i create a list of the active working that does not belong to the user root?thanks (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: battaglia
5 Replies

8. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

Active / Non Active users ?

Hey, I have few Questions : 1. How to Check/Find who all are the users accessing the server using their id ? 2. How to Check who is the active user or non active user (whose id exists but the access privileges has been removed) ? I am presently using AIX5.3 as a server. Please suggest... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: varungupta
3 Replies
Login or Register to Ask a Question