Sponsored Content
Top Forums UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers vi/vim : complex pattern substitution Post 54129 by Ygor on Tuesday 3rd of August 2004 10:04:08 AM
Old 08-03-2004
Although the solution is found, it's worth mentioning that you can also pipe a file through a command using {!} from within vi, e.g.
Code:
{!}awk -F'.' '{print "COUNT(DISTINCT(" $0 ")) as " $2 ","}'

 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Shell Programming and Scripting

pattern match and substitution, can you help?

pattern match and substitution, can you help? file named test.txt I want to replace all the words Event with the word Fatal in all lines containing the word ERR - but I also want to keep the output of the other lines not matching ERR Test.txt: Event 13 INF egegegege Event 14 INF... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: frustrated1
4 Replies

2. Shell Programming and Scripting

complex command substitution

hi, I have to execute this line below from within a shell script; simply backquoting it is not doing the trick; it is mangling up all the options; but when i type it out on a command line, it executes cleanly. Please help me in getting this right; $ vlc -I dummy --sout='#transcode{vcodec=mp4v,... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: spopuri
5 Replies

3. Shell Programming and Scripting

Perl:string substitution Pattern: ='abc...',

Hi friends, I want to substitute "a ='....'," with ":" in everywhere in a string using Perl. Details: ---------- my $str= " c1='fgfasfgasggfgff.,akhkhahha', c2='bbbn', c3='hg5 sh' "; Required o/p: $str= " c1:c2:c3 " I tried as below: $str=~ s/=\'.*\',/:/g ; print "str=... (14 Replies)
Discussion started by: Niroj
14 Replies

4. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Vim: help with substitution

What is the appropriate command should i use to insert a character(example A) in front of line 1 to line 200...Pls help (7 Replies)
Discussion started by: 793589
7 Replies

5. Solaris

Very Importan - Vim Settings - Error while opening a File using vim

I downloaded vim.7.2 and compiled the vim source . Added the vim binary path to PATH (Because iam not the root of the box) when i load the file using vim it throws me an error Error detected while processing /home2/e3003091/.vimrc: line 2: E185: Cannot find color scheme darkblue line... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: girija
0 Replies

6. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Vim help - delete words in a file or characters after pattern

I have a file with words that begin with character #. Whenver that character is found that word should be deleted throughout the file. How do I do that in VIM. e.g: afkajfa ladfa ljafa #222222 kjafad ljl afajkj kjlj uouu #44444 jlkj lkjl Output should be afkajfa ladfa ljafa kjafad... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: osbourneric
1 Replies

7. Shell Programming and Scripting

sed pattern substitution issue?

Hello everyone ... I'm going crazy, I hope some of you can help me ... I have to replace a line in a crontab like this: 5 2 * * 2 root backupdat with this: 5 5 * * 3 root backupdat the command I use is the following: sed -i.bak -e 's/5 2 * * 2 root backupdat/5 5 * * 3 root... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: ionral
4 Replies

8. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Substitution mid pattern?

Hi there, I have a file that goes like this: b_cdbc_db_cd_bcd_aaa-bcd_cd That type of format, for many lines. What I want to do is enter a new line character for after the _ I write an expression to find "_...-" fine, but I don't know how to substitute this to be: "_\naaa-" - where... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: maximus73
1 Replies

9. Shell Programming and Scripting

sed -- Find pattern -- print remainder -- plus lines up to pattern -- Minus pattern

The intended result should be : PDF converters 'empty line' gpdftext and pdftotext?xml version="1.0"?> xml:space="preserve"><note-content version="0.1" xmlns:/tomboy/link" xmlns:size="http://beatniksoftware.com/tomboy/size">PDF converters gpdftext and pdftotext</note-content>... (9 Replies)
Discussion started by: Klasform
9 Replies

10. Shell Programming and Scripting

sed - pattern match - apply substitution

Greetings Experts, I am on AIX and in process of creating a re-startable script that connects to Oracle and executes the statements. The sample contents of the file1 is CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW DB_V.TAB1 AS SELECT * FROM DB_T.TAB1; .... CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW DB_V.TAB10 AS SELECT * FROM... (9 Replies)
Discussion started by: chill3chee
9 Replies
NEXT(3perl)						 Perl Programmers Reference Guide					       NEXT(3perl)

NAME
NEXT.pm - Provide a pseudo-class NEXT (et al) that allows method redispatch SYNOPSIS
use NEXT; package A; sub A::method { print "$_[0]: A method "; $_[0]->NEXT::method() } sub A::DESTROY { print "$_[0]: A dtor "; $_[0]->NEXT::DESTROY() } package B; use base qw( A ); sub B::AUTOLOAD { print "$_[0]: B AUTOLOAD "; $_[0]->NEXT::AUTOLOAD() } sub B::DESTROY { print "$_[0]: B dtor "; $_[0]->NEXT::DESTROY() } package C; sub C::method { print "$_[0]: C method "; $_[0]->NEXT::method() } sub C::AUTOLOAD { print "$_[0]: C AUTOLOAD "; $_[0]->NEXT::AUTOLOAD() } sub C::DESTROY { print "$_[0]: C dtor "; $_[0]->NEXT::DESTROY() } package D; use base qw( B C ); sub D::method { print "$_[0]: D method "; $_[0]->NEXT::method() } sub D::AUTOLOAD { print "$_[0]: D AUTOLOAD "; $_[0]->NEXT::AUTOLOAD() } sub D::DESTROY { print "$_[0]: D dtor "; $_[0]->NEXT::DESTROY() } package main; my $obj = bless {}, "D"; $obj->method(); # Calls D::method, A::method, C::method $obj->missing_method(); # Calls D::AUTOLOAD, B::AUTOLOAD, C::AUTOLOAD # Clean-up calls D::DESTROY, B::DESTROY, A::DESTROY, C::DESTROY DESCRIPTION
NEXT.pm adds a pseudoclass named "NEXT" to any program that uses it. If a method "m" calls "$self->NEXT::m()", the call to "m" is redispatched as if the calling method had not originally been found. In other words, a call to "$self->NEXT::m()" resumes the depth-first, left-to-right search of $self's class hierarchy that resulted in the original call to "m". Note that this is not the same thing as "$self->SUPER::m()", which begins a new dispatch that is restricted to searching the ancestors of the current class. "$self->NEXT::m()" can backtrack past the current class -- to look for a suitable method in other ancestors of $self -- whereas "$self->SUPER::m()" cannot. A typical use would be in the destructors of a class hierarchy, as illustrated in the synopsis above. Each class in the hierarchy has a DESTROY method that performs some class-specific action and then redispatches the call up the hierarchy. As a result, when an object of class D is destroyed, the destructors of all its parent classes are called (in depth-first, left-to-right order). Another typical use of redispatch would be in "AUTOLOAD"'ed methods. If such a method determined that it was not able to handle a particular call, it might choose to redispatch that call, in the hope that some other "AUTOLOAD" (above it, or to its left) might do better. By default, if a redispatch attempt fails to find another method elsewhere in the objects class hierarchy, it quietly gives up and does nothing (but see "Enforcing redispatch"). This gracious acquiescence is also unlike the (generally annoying) behaviour of "SUPER", which throws an exception if it cannot redispatch. Note that it is a fatal error for any method (including "AUTOLOAD") to attempt to redispatch any method that does not have the same name. For example: sub D::oops { print "oops! "; $_[0]->NEXT::other_method() } Enforcing redispatch It is possible to make "NEXT" redispatch more demandingly (i.e. like "SUPER" does), so that the redispatch throws an exception if it cannot find a "next" method to call. To do this, simple invoke the redispatch as: $self->NEXT::ACTUAL::method(); rather than: $self->NEXT::method(); The "ACTUAL" tells "NEXT" that there must actually be a next method to call, or it should throw an exception. "NEXT::ACTUAL" is most commonly used in "AUTOLOAD" methods, as a means to decline an "AUTOLOAD" request, but preserve the normal exception- on-failure semantics: sub AUTOLOAD { if ($AUTOLOAD =~ /foo|bar/) { # handle here } else { # try elsewhere shift()->NEXT::ACTUAL::AUTOLOAD(@_); } } By using "NEXT::ACTUAL", if there is no other "AUTOLOAD" to handle the method call, an exception will be thrown (as usually happens in the absence of a suitable "AUTOLOAD"). Avoiding repetitions If "NEXT" redispatching is used in the methods of a "diamond" class hierarchy: # A B # / / # C D # / # E use NEXT; package A; sub foo { print "called A::foo "; shift->NEXT::foo() } package B; sub foo { print "called B::foo "; shift->NEXT::foo() } package C; @ISA = qw( A ); sub foo { print "called C::foo "; shift->NEXT::foo() } package D; @ISA = qw(A B); sub foo { print "called D::foo "; shift->NEXT::foo() } package E; @ISA = qw(C D); sub foo { print "called E::foo "; shift->NEXT::foo() } E->foo(); then derived classes may (re-)inherit base-class methods through two or more distinct paths (e.g. in the way "E" inherits "A::foo" twice -- through "C" and "D"). In such cases, a sequence of "NEXT" redispatches will invoke the multiply inherited method as many times as it is inherited. For example, the above code prints: called E::foo called C::foo called A::foo called D::foo called A::foo called B::foo (i.e. "A::foo" is called twice). In some cases this may be the desired effect within a diamond hierarchy, but in others (e.g. for destructors) it may be more appropriate to call each method only once during a sequence of redispatches. To cover such cases, you can redispatch methods via: $self->NEXT::DISTINCT::method(); rather than: $self->NEXT::method(); This causes the redispatcher to only visit each distinct "method" method once. That is, to skip any classes in the hierarchy that it has already visited during redispatch. So, for example, if the previous example were rewritten: package A; sub foo { print "called A::foo "; shift->NEXT::DISTINCT::foo() } package B; sub foo { print "called B::foo "; shift->NEXT::DISTINCT::foo() } package C; @ISA = qw( A ); sub foo { print "called C::foo "; shift->NEXT::DISTINCT::foo() } package D; @ISA = qw(A B); sub foo { print "called D::foo "; shift->NEXT::DISTINCT::foo() } package E; @ISA = qw(C D); sub foo { print "called E::foo "; shift->NEXT::DISTINCT::foo() } E->foo(); then it would print: called E::foo called C::foo called A::foo called D::foo called B::foo and omit the second call to "A::foo" (since it would not be distinct from the first call to "A::foo"). Note that you can also use: $self->NEXT::DISTINCT::ACTUAL::method(); or: $self->NEXT::ACTUAL::DISTINCT::method(); to get both unique invocation and exception-on-failure. Note that, for historical compatibility, you can also use "NEXT::UNSEEN" instead of "NEXT::DISTINCT". Invoking all versions of a method with a single call Yet another pseudo-class that NEXT.pm provides is "EVERY". Its behaviour is considerably simpler than that of the "NEXT" family. A call to: $obj->EVERY::foo(); calls every method named "foo" that the object in $obj has inherited. That is: use NEXT; package A; @ISA = qw(B D X); sub foo { print "A::foo " } package B; @ISA = qw(D X); sub foo { print "B::foo " } package X; @ISA = qw(D); sub foo { print "X::foo " } package D; sub foo { print "D::foo " } package main; my $obj = bless {}, 'A'; $obj->EVERY::foo(); # prints" A::foo B::foo X::foo D::foo Prefixing a method call with "EVERY::" causes every method in the object's hierarchy with that name to be invoked. As the above example illustrates, they are not called in Perl's usual "left-most-depth-first" order. Instead, they are called "breadth-first-dependency-wise". That means that the inheritance tree of the object is traversed breadth-first and the resulting order of classes is used as the sequence in which methods are called. However, that sequence is modified by imposing a rule that the appropriate method of a derived class must be called before the same method of any ancestral class. That's why, in the above example, "X::foo" is called before "D::foo", even though "D" comes before "X" in @B::ISA. In general, there's no need to worry about the order of calls. They will be left-to-right, breadth-first, most-derived-first. This works perfectly for most inherited methods (including destructors), but is inappropriate for some kinds of methods (such as constructors, cloners, debuggers, and initializers) where it's more appropriate that the least-derived methods be called first (as more-derived methods may rely on the behaviour of their "ancestors"). In that case, instead of using the "EVERY" pseudo-class: $obj->EVERY::foo(); # prints" A::foo B::foo X::foo D::foo you can use the "EVERY::LAST" pseudo-class: $obj->EVERY::LAST::foo(); # prints" D::foo X::foo B::foo A::foo which reverses the order of method call. Whichever version is used, the actual methods are called in the same context (list, scalar, or void) as the original call via "EVERY", and return: o A hash of array references in list context. Each entry of the hash has the fully qualified method name as its key and a reference to an array containing the method's list-context return values as its value. o A reference to a hash of scalar values in scalar context. Each entry of the hash has the fully qualified method name as its key and the method's scalar-context return values as its value. o Nothing in void context (obviously). Using "EVERY" methods The typical way to use an "EVERY" call is to wrap it in another base method, that all classes inherit. For example, to ensure that every destructor an object inherits is actually called (as opposed to just the left-most-depth-first-est one): package Base; sub DESTROY { $_[0]->EVERY::Destroy } package Derived1; use base 'Base'; sub Destroy {...} package Derived2; use base 'Base', 'Derived1'; sub Destroy {...} et cetera. Every derived class than needs its own clean-up behaviour simply adds its own "Destroy" method (not a "DESTROY" method), which the call to "EVERY::LAST::Destroy" in the inherited destructor then correctly picks up. Likewise, to create a class hierarchy in which every initializer inherited by a new object is invoked: package Base; sub new { my ($class, %args) = @_; my $obj = bless {}, $class; $obj->EVERY::LAST::Init(\%args); } package Derived1; use base 'Base'; sub Init { my ($argsref) = @_; ... } package Derived2; use base 'Base', 'Derived1'; sub Init { my ($argsref) = @_; ... } et cetera. Every derived class than needs some additional initialization behaviour simply adds its own "Init" method (not a "new" method), which the call to "EVERY::LAST::Init" in the inherited constructor then correctly picks up. AUTHOR
Damian Conway (damian@conway.org) BUGS AND IRRITATIONS
Because it's a module, not an integral part of the interpreter, NEXT.pm has to guess where the surrounding call was found in the method look-up sequence. In the presence of diamond inheritance patterns it occasionally guesses wrong. It's also too slow (despite caching). Comment, suggestions, and patches welcome. COPYRIGHT
Copyright (c) 2000-2001, Damian Conway. All Rights Reserved. This module is free software. It may be used, redistributed and/or modified under the same terms as Perl itself. perl v5.14.2 2011-09-19 NEXT(3perl)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:52 AM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy