Sponsored Content
Special Forums Cybersecurity Datacenter Crash (Server Unreachable for About 17 minutes) Post 303044531 by vbe on Tuesday 25th of February 2020 11:41:11 AM
Old 02-25-2020
Have you any idea what equipment they are using?
I suppose X86 blade servers but what? and what kind of hypervisors...
 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

linux server crash

Hi I faced a problem while booting linux which is as follows;- ************************************************* Inode 146180 has illegal block(s) xauth:error in locking authority file /home/root/.Xauthority Fatal Server Error: Could not create lock file in /tmp/tXo-lock ... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: Abhishek
1 Replies

2. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

server crash

Our SUn Solaris Server has crashed second time in 2 days, reason is not known , we are trying to determine what could have gone wrong, any ideas, the power supply seems to be fine, there is no response from keyboard,monitor etc and we had to do a hot boot yesterday.. Any suggestions what could be... (9 Replies)
Discussion started by: knarayan
9 Replies

3. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

Solaris Server Crash

We have had a server (Solaris 2.6) hardisk crash. When booting the server we get: ok> boot -S Boot Device: /sbus/espdmc@e, 8400000/esp@e,8800000/sd@0,0 short read 0x2000 chars read disk read error The only way we can get into the console is to ok> boot cdrom whereby everything (e.g.... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: Breen
3 Replies

4. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Notification if server unreachable?

Is it possible for a group of servers to monitor each other and then send an alert if one of them is no longer 'alive'? Or if its easier have one server that monitors the other five and then sends an alert. If so how would this be done? Thanks (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: Sepia
3 Replies

5. Linux

crash dump server for red hat ent 4

Is it true that you can't have the crash dump server/client on the same server? I know I've installed Nagios open source before, I though it's only for that kind of thing. I never though that Red hat ent 4 would be like client/server on the crash dump. if someone is having problem with high... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: itik
0 Replies

6. Programming

Client/Server Socket Application - Preventing Client from quitting on server crash

Problem - Linux Client/Server Socket Application: Preventing Client from quitting on server crash Hi, I am writing a Linux socket Server and Client using TCP protocol on Ubuntu 9.04 x64. I am having problem trying to implement a scenario where the client should keep running even when the... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: varun.nagpaal
2 Replies

7. SCO

Crash error on my unix server

Hi there. Well i have a really bad problem with my server: UnixWare Version 5 Release 7 The system crash :wall: and show the error: Panic: Kernel-mode address fault on user address 0x00000004 :eek: If anyone knows about the reason of this error please give me a help Sorry by my english.... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: danilosevilla
3 Replies

8. Programming

Client accidently close when the server crash

The steps to test the problem 1. Open TCP Server 2. Open TCP Client 3. TCP Client sends data to Server. 4. Close TCP Server and the client also crash without any notification Second wonderful test: 1. Comment the following statement in Client.c (at line 168) and compile it Writen(... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: sehang
1 Replies

9. Red Hat

how to configure netdump to copy the crash in the server itself??

hi, i would like to configure netdump, but saving the var/crash in the server itself, not in another server. could anybody tell me if this is possible? thanks (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: pabloli150
4 Replies

10. AIX

System p 9115-505: Server and HMC unreachable

Hi there I've bought a used System p 9115-505. When I attach the LAN cable to my router the HMC receives an IP address from my router, but the HMC is unreachable. There are no open ports. Does anybody know that problem? Any help greatly appreciated. Greetings from Italy! (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: mediaset23
2 Replies
smtpdcheck(1)							Mail Avenger 0.8.3						     smtpdcheck(1)

NAME
smtpdcheck - check SMTP servers SYNOPSIS
smtpdcheck [--stop {ip-addr|name}] [--timeout seconds] [prio:]server [[prio:]server] DESCRIPTION
smtpdcheck checks to see if SMTP servers are available. The intent is for use on secondary mail servers, which have no reason to accept mail when the primary server is available. The argument consists of a list of server names, each of which may optionally be prefixed by a numeric MX priority and a colon. (This is exactly the format for MX records returned by the avenger dns command.) smtpdcheck will attempt to connect to each server in succession. If one of the servers specified on the command line is available, smtpdcheck will print its name to standard output and exit with status 1. If smtpdcheck cannot connect to any of the servers, it will exit with status 0. If a system error occurs, smtpdcheck will exit with status 2. OPTIONS --stop {ip-addr|name} Tells smtpdcheck to stop before checking a server with IP address ip-addr or hostname name. If such a host is encountered in the list of servers and prio is specified, then smtpdcheck will consider it acceptable for other servers with the same priority to be available, even if those servers were first in the list. In other words, given the following arguments: smtpdcheck --stop s2.domain.com 10:s1.domain.com 10:s2.domain.com 20:s3.domain.com This command will always succeed, regardless of whether "s1.domain.com" is up, because "s2.domain.com" has the same priority. On the other hand, the following command will fail and output "s1.domain.com" if "s1.domain.com" is up: smtpdcheck --stop s2.domain.com 10:s1.domain.com 20:s2.domain.com 30:s3.domain.com If a gethostbyname lookup for the argument name fails, smtpdcheck will exit immediately with status 2. --timeout {seconds] By default, smtpdcheck spends 10 seconds probing each server. This includes the time to do a DNS lookup, to establish a TCP connection to port 25 of the server, and to read the "220" SMTP code from the server's SMTP greeting message. To use a different value, specify it with the --timeout option. The value 0 disables the timeout completely, which is dangerous since smtpdcheck might then end up waiting forever to read the "220" string. EXAMPLES
To refuse to relay mail at a secondary MX server when the primary server is not down, you might place the following in /etc/avenger/secondary (assuming MxLocalRcpt is 1): dns RECIP_MXES mx "$RECIPIENT_HOST" setvars server=`smtpdcheck --stop $MYIP $RECIP_MXES` test -n "$server" && defer "Please use server $server" SEE ALSO
avenger(1) dbutil(1) asmtpd.conf(5), The Mail Avenger home page: <http://www.mailavenger.org/>. BUGS
smtpdcheck could achieve much lower latency by probing all the servers simultaneously. It should also include some kind of caching, to avoid repeatedly trying to contact an unavailable server. Finally, hosts with multiple IP addresses could be handled more cleanly, though what smtpdcheck does should probably work in most cases. AUTHOR
David Mazieres Mail Avenger 0.8.3 2012-04-05 smtpdcheck(1)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:14 AM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy