Sponsored Content
Operating Systems OS X (Apple) 12-Core MacPro (2013) kernel_task over 1200% Post 303033961 by wisecracker on Monday 15th of April 2019 10:43:23 AM
Old 04-15-2019
Hi Neo...

Having dealt with Apple with my old MacBook Pro, under extended warranty, the unit was effectively fixed the same day, new HDD required.
(My choice to pick up the next day.)
IIRC their diagnostics was through the "ethernet" port on my old machine and I was relatively impressed with how it worked.
(Said machine runs dedicated Linux now.)

I have heard NOT particularly good reports of some APPLE outlets but ours here in Leicester, UK was good.
YMMV in your area of the USA.

Good luck with your serious tool, and I hope all is fixed at a sensible price soon...

Bazza.
This User Gave Thanks to wisecracker For This Post:
 

6 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Can I use a general printer(HP LaserJet 1200) on solaris?

can it be used? how to config it? thanks (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: cloudsmell
4 Replies

2. OS X (Apple)

kernel_task help

I installed 10.5 (Leopard) on my G4 733 Mhz (after minor tampering with the install package, just switched a boolean FALSE to TRUE). Everything works fine after startup, but once I sleep the computer and wake it back up, kernel_task starts using at as much CPU runtime as it can, as in past 90%.... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: peter.story
0 Replies

3. Solaris

T5140 CPU Speed is 1200 Mhz or 1165 Mhz?

Hi bros, CPU speed of Sun Sparc Enterprise T5140 in data sheet is 1200 Mhz. Why it shows in "prtdiag -v" command each thread just has speed at 1165 Mhz. Thank you, tien86 (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: tien86
4 Replies

4. Hardware

2013 Apple Mac Pro 2.7GHz 12 Core/64GB/256GB Flash/Dual AMD FirePro D700 6GB 6,1

Hey MacPro users. I just bought a refurbished 13-Core MacPro with 64GB of RAM for a cybersecurity gaming project I'm working on. Could not wait for the new MacPro in 2019, so this will have to do: 2013 Apple Mac Pro 2.7GHz 12 Core/64GB/256GB Flash/Dual AMD FirePro D700 6GB 6,1 Now, I'm... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: Neo
0 Replies

5. OS X (Apple)

DiskSpeedTest 256GB OEM v. 960GB Transcend 855 SSD MacPro 2013, 12-Core, 64GB RAM

Before Upgrade: https://www.unix.com/members/1-albums177-picture1220.png After Upgrade: https://www.unix.com/members/1-albums177-picture1221.png (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: Neo
0 Replies

6. OS X (Apple)

Warning! Upgrade to Catalina 10.15.3 Crashes MacPro (2013) - Will Not Boot !

WARNING! Just upgraded my MacPro (2013) from Catalina 10.15.2 to 10.15.3. After the routine download and restart for upgrade installation, the Mac would not boot. Totally crashed. Now, I'm in the process of a 15 hour restore from my last time machine backup. I'm not very happy with... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: Neo
3 Replies
guestfs-performance(1)					      Virtualization Support					    guestfs-performance(1)

NAME
guestfs-performance - engineering libguestfs for greatest performance DESCRIPTION
This page documents how to get the greatest performance out of libguestfs, especially when you expect to use libguestfs to manipulate thousands of virtual machines or disk images. Three main areas are covered. Libguestfs runs an appliance (a small Linux distribution) inside qemu/KVM. The first two areas are: minimizing the time taken to start this appliance, and the number of times the appliance has to be started. The third area is shortening the time taken for inspection of VMs. BASELINE MEASUREMENTS
Before making changes to how you use libguestfs, take baseline measurements. BASELINE: STARTING THE APPLIANCE On an unloaded machine, time how long it takes to start up the appliance: time guestfish -a /dev/null run Run this command several times in a row and discard the first few runs, so that you are measuring a typical "hot cache" case. Explanation This command starts up the libguestfs appliance on a null disk, and then immediately shuts it down. The first time you run the command, it will create an appliance and cache it (usually under "/var/tmp/.guestfs-*"). Subsequent runs should reuse the cached appliance. Expected results You should expect to be getting times under 6 seconds. If the times you see on an unloaded machine are above this, then see the section "TROUBLESHOOTING POOR PERFORMANCE" below. BASELINE: PERFORMING INSPECTION OF A GUEST For this test you will need an unloaded machine and at least one real guest or disk image. If you are planning to use libguestfs against only X guests (eg. X = Windows), then using an X guest here would be most appropriate. If you are planning to run libguestfs against a mix of guests, then use a mix of guests for testing here. Time how long it takes to perform inspection and mount the disks of the guest. Use the first command if you will be using disk images, and the second command if you will be using libvirt. time guestfish --ro -a disk.img -i exit time guestfish --ro -d GuestName -i exit Run the command several times in a row and discard the first few runs, so that you are measuring a typical "hot cache" case. Explanation This command starts up the libguestfs appliance on the named disk image or libvirt guest, performs libguestfs inspection on it (see "INSPECTION" in guestfs(3)), mounts the guest's disks, then discards all these results and shuts down. The first time you run the command, it will create an appliance and cache it (usually under "/var/tmp/.guestfs-*"). Subsequent runs should reuse the cached appliance. Expected results You should expect times which are <= 5 seconds greater than measured in the first baseline test above. (For example, if the first baseline test ran in 5 seconds, then this test should run in <= 10 seconds). UNDERSTANDING THE APPLIANCE AND WHEN IT IS BUILT
/CACHED The first time you use libguestfs, it will build and cache an appliance. This is usually in "/var/tmp/.guestfs-*", unless you have set $TMPDIR in which case it will be under that temporary directory. For more information about how the appliance is constructed, see "SUPERMIN APPLIANCES" in febootstrap(8). Every time libguestfs runs it will check that no host files used by the appliance have changed. If any have, then the appliance is rebuilt. This usually happens when a package is installed or updated on the host (eg. using programs like "yum" or "apt-get"). The reason for reconstructing the appliance is security: the new program that has been installed might contain a security fix, and so we want to include the fixed program in the appliance automatically. These are the performance implications: o The process of building (or rebuilding) the cached appliance is slow, and you can avoid this happening by using a fixed appliance (see below). o If not using a fixed appliance, be aware that updating software on the host will cause a one time rebuild of the appliance. o "/var/tmp" (or $TMPDIR) should be on a fast disk, and have plenty of space for the appliance. USING A FIXED APPLIANCE
To fully control when the appliance is built, you can build a fixed appliance. This appliance can and should be stored on a fast, local disk. To build the appliance, run the command: libguestfs-make-fixed-appliance <directory> replacing "<directory>" with the name of a directory where the appliance will be stored (normally you would name a subdirectory, for example: "/usr/local/lib/guestfs/appliance" or "/dev/shm/appliance"). Then set $LIBGUESTFS_PATH (and ensure this environment variable is set in your libguestfs program), or modify your program so it calls "guestfs_set_path". For example: export LIBGUESTFS_PATH=/usr/local/lib/guestfs/appliance Now you can run libguestfs programs, virt tools, guestfish etc. as normal. The programs will use your fixed appliance, and will not ever build, rebuild, or cache their own appliance. (For detailed information on this subject, see: libguestfs-make-fixed-appliance(1)). PERFORMANCE OF THE FIXED APPLIANCE In our testing we did not find that using a fixed appliance gave any measurable performance benefit, even when the appliance was located in memory (ie. on "/dev/shm"). However there are three points to consider: 1. Using a fixed appliance stops libguestfs from ever rebuilding the appliance, meaning that libguestfs will have more predictable start- up times. 2. By default libguestfs (or rather, febootstrap-supermin-helper(8)) searches over the root filesystem to find out if any host files have changed and if it needs to rebuild the appliance. If these files are not cached and the root filesystem is on an HDD, then this generates lots of seeks. Using a fixed appliance avoids all this. 3. The appliance is loaded on demand. A simple test such as: time guestfish -a /dev/null run does not load very much of the appliance. A real libguestfs program using complicated API calls would demand-load a lot more of the appliance. Being able to store the appliance in a specified location makes the performance more predictable. REDUCING THE NUMBER OF TIMES THE APPLIANCE IS LAUNCHED
By far the most effective, though not always the simplest way to get good performance is to ensure that the appliance is launched the minimum number of times. This will probably involve changing your libguestfs application. Try to call "guestfs_launch" at most once per virtual machine. Instead of using a separate instance of guestfish(1) to make a series of changes to the same guest, use a single instance of guestfish and/or use the guestfish --listen option. Consider writing your program as a daemon which holds a guest open while making a series of changes. Or marshal all the operations you want to perform before opening the guest. You can also try adding disks from multiple guests to a single appliance. Before trying this, note the following points: 1. Adding multiple guests to one appliance is a security problem because it may allow one guest to interfere with the disks of another guest. Only do it if you trust all the guests, or if you can group guests by trust. 2. In current qemu, there is a limit of around 26 disks that can be added to the appliance. In future versions of qemu (and hence libguestfs) we hope to lift this limit. 3. Using libguestfs this way is complicated. Disks can have unexpected interactions: for example, if two guests use the same UUID for a filesystem (because they were cloned), or have volume groups with the same name (but see "guestfs_lvm_set_filter"). virt-df(1) adds multiple disks by default, so the source code for this program would be a good place to start. SHORTENING THE TIME TAKEN FOR INSPECTION OF VMs The main advice is obvious: Do not perform inspection (which is expensive) unless you need the results. If you previously performed inspection on the guest, then it may be safe to cache and reuse the results from last time. Some disks don't need to be inspected at all: for example, if you are creating a disk image, or if the disk image is not a VM, or if the disk image has a known layout. Even when basic inspection ("guestfs_inspect_os") is required, auxiliary inspection operations may be avoided: o Mounting disks is only necessary to get further filesystem information. o Listing applications ("guestfs_inspect_list_applications") is an expensive operation on Linux, but almost free on Windows. o Generating a guest icon ("guestfs_inspect_get_icon") is cheap on Linux but expensive on Windows. TROUBLESHOOTING POOR PERFORMANCE
ENSURE HARDWARE VIRTUALIZATION IS AVAILABLE Use "/proc/cpuinfo" and this page: http://virt-tools.org/learning/check-hardware-virt/ to ensure that hardware virtualization is available. Note that you may need to enable it in your BIOS. Hardware virt is not usually available inside VMs, and libguestfs will run slowly inside another virtual machine whatever you do. Nested virtualization does not work well in our experience, and is certainly no substitute for running libguestfs on baremetal. ENSURE KVM IS AVAILABLE Ensure that KVM is enabled and available to the user that will run libguestfs. It should be safe to set 0666 permissions on "/dev/kvm" and most distributions now do this. PROCESSORS TO AVOID Avoid processors that don't have hardware virtualization, and some processors which are simply very slow (AMD Geode being a great example). DETAILED TIMINGS USING SYSTEMTAP
You can use SystemTap (stap(1)) to get detailed timings from libguestfs programs. Save the following script as "time.stap": global last; function display_time () { now = gettimeofday_us (); delta = 0; if (last > 0) delta = now - last; last = now; printf ("%d (+%d):", now, delta); } probe begin { last = 0; printf ("ready "); } /* Display all calls to static markers. */ probe process("/usr/lib*/libguestfs.so.0") .provider("guestfs").mark("*") ? { display_time(); printf (" %s %s ", $$name, $$parms); } /* Display all calls to guestfs_* functions. */ probe process("/usr/lib*/libguestfs.so.0") .function("guestfs_[a-z]*") ? { display_time(); printf (" %s %s ", probefunc(), $$parms); } Run it as root in one window: # stap time.stap ready It prints "ready" when SystemTap has loaded the program. Run your libguestfs program, guestfish or a virt tool in another window. For example: $ guestfish -a /dev/null run In the stap window you will see a large amount of output, with the time taken for each step shown (microseconds in parenthesis). For example: xxxx (+0): guestfs_create xxxx (+29): guestfs_set_pgroup g=0x17a9de0 pgroup=0x1 xxxx (+9): guestfs_add_drive_opts_argv g=0x17a9de0 [...] xxxx (+8): guestfs_safe_strdup g=0x17a9de0 str=0x7f8a153bed5d xxxx (+19): guestfs_safe_malloc g=0x17a9de0 nbytes=0x38 xxxx (+5): guestfs_safe_strdup g=0x17a9de0 str=0x17a9f60 xxxx (+10): guestfs_launch g=0x17a9de0 xxxx (+4): launch_start [etc] You will need to consult, and even modify, the source to libguestfs to fully understand the output. SEE ALSO
febootstrap(8), febootstrap-supermin-helper(8), guestfish(1), guestfs(3), guestfs-examples(3), libguestfs-make-fixed-appliance(1), stap(1), <http://libguestfs.org/>. AUTHORS
Richard W.M. Jones ("rjones at redhat dot com") COPYRIGHT
Copyright (C) 2012 Red Hat Inc. <http://libguestfs.org/> This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version. This library is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU Lesser General Public License for more details. You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public License along with this library; if not, write to the Free Software Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA libguestfs-1.18.1 2013-12-07 guestfs-performance(1)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:50 PM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy