The contents of /etc/conf/cf.d/mscsi changes whenever I go into "mkdev cdrom" to make changes. I have tried to remove the cdrom drive and start fresh twice, and I need to have a couple of things clarified, I think: #1 - is the "mkdev cdrom" the right command to start with? #2 - what is the difference between adding a driver or adding a device? If I start with trying to add the CD Rom device, it says that I first need to install a driver. So I proceed to install a CD Rom driver using my IDE info (which I think is Secondary Master), rebuild kernel, etc. and reboot. Then when I go and try to add the CD Rom device, it tells me there is already a device configured with that IDE info. At no time, however, have I been able to do a successful mounting of the CD using:
So I know I'm doing something wrong, but I don't know what to do differently.
From above:
Quote:
what is the difference between adding a driver or adding a device?
Since your HD came from a different platform, I think the steps would be:
1. 'mkdev cdrom' to remove the old device config and driver. Relink the kernel and reboot.
When completely happy that all traces of old CDROM config have gone, i.e. system complains that there's no driver.....
2. 'mkdev cdrom' to install the new driver. Relink the kernel and reboot.
3. 'mkdev cdrom' (again!!) to configure the device. Prompts are different from (2) above. Relink the kernel and reboot.
Having to run 'mkdev cdrom' twice to configure a new disk or CDROM device, first for the driver and second for the configuration, confuses many. Have no doubt about that.
I've just installed Unix SCO OpenServer System v in an Intel PC and Everithing ok, except just one thing, in the begining of the installation the wizard asked me about the mouse , i have a generic 3 buttons mouse and i took a logitech and did not work
i need to change the mouse configuration, ... (2 Replies)
hello!
when i try to make my system dual boot with both win98 & sco open server 5.5 it doesn't work at all.neither win98 take start nor sco open server boots.what should i do ?
kindly help me
thanks (1 Reply)
I am doing some work for a customer that is running SCO 5.0.2 openserver and they have lost their cd. Is there anyplace I can download it? I have a replacement being shipped but it will not be here for two days and they are down. Any ideals? (3 Replies)
hello guys.
I just installed SCO 5.0.6 OpenServer it went all the way to the end of the installation and the first boot try it gave me this message.
not a directory
boot not found
cannot open
stage 1 boot failure: error loading hd (40)/boot (2 Replies)
Hi there guys.
I just got this new SCO version and i'm having some problem printing from shell,
This is what i'm typing at the # sign : lp -dHP /etc/hosts and it prints no problem but when i use any other user at the $ sign it gives me this error.
/dev/fd/7: /usr/lib/lp/sysv/7: not found.
... (1 Reply)
Hi guys,
I just got this new 6.0 version and i'm trying to setup a remote office to telnet to this server running sco 6.0, in previous version all i have to do is add this file under /etc/rc2.d call S99route and put the gate in that file and that was it, for some reason in 6.0 it does not... (1 Reply)
Dear members
when i installed dual processor patch in openserver 5.0.7 in hp ML370 G4 server it hangs in sco at G_hd_config.
i tried MP4, EFS 5.64,5.70A but not solved the problem.. (0 Replies)
Hi,
I have an openserver 5.0.0 machine in the office. The sysad of that machine left years ago without leaving the password to anyone.
I was wondering if someone has a copy of the boot / root diskettes (rescue) for this version? Or perhaps if anyone knows a download link / location in the... (0 Replies)
I need SCO Openserver 4.2. Please, give me distributive of that version SCO:eek: (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: caine
0 Replies
LEARN ABOUT CENTOS
cfree
CFREE(3) Linux Programmer's Manual CFREE(3)NAME
cfree - free allocated memory
SYNOPSIS
#include <stdlib.h>
/* In SunOS 4 */
int cfree(void *ptr);
/* In glibc or FreeBSD libcompat */
void cfree(void *ptr);
/* In SCO OpenServer */
void cfree(char *ptr, unsigned num, unsigned size);
/* In Solaris watchmalloc.so.1 */
void cfree(void *ptr, size_t nelem, size_t elsize);
Feature Test Macro Requirements for glibc (see feature_test_macros(7)):
cfree(): _BSD_SOURCE || _SVID_SOURCE
DESCRIPTION
This function should never be used. Use free(3) instead.
1-arg cfree
In glibc, the function cfree() is a synonym for free(3), "added for compatibility with SunOS".
Other systems have other functions with this name. The declaration is sometimes in <stdlib.h> and sometimes in <malloc.h>.
3-arg cfree
Some SCO and Solaris versions have malloc libraries with a 3-argument cfree(), apparently as an analog to calloc(3).
If you need it while porting something, add
#define cfree(p, n, s) free((p))
to your file.
A frequently asked question is "Can I use free(3) to free memory allocated with calloc(3), or do I need cfree()?" Answer: use free(3).
An SCO manual writes: "The cfree routine is provided for compliance to the iBCSe2 standard and simply calls free. The num and size argu-
ments to cfree are not used."
RETURN VALUE
The SunOS version of cfree() (which is a synonym for free(3)) returns 1 on success and 0 on failure. In case of error, errno is set to
EINVAL: the value of ptr was not a pointer to a block previously allocated by one of the routines in the malloc(3) family.
CONFORMING TO
The 3-argument version of cfree() as used by SCO conforms to the iBCSe2 standard: Intel386 Binary Compatibility Specification, Edition 2.
SEE ALSO malloc(3)COLOPHON
This page is part of release 3.53 of the Linux man-pages project. A description of the project, and information about reporting bugs, can
be found at http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/.
2007-07-26 CFREE(3)