07-29-2017
Hi.
I've been loitering on the site for most of the day and haven't seen any performance issues. There was certainly no planned or ongoing activities from our side.
It's possible there was some attempted DoS-type attack on the server while you were on the site, but it has, as far as I can tell, been all right today.
5 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting
1. Post Here to Contact Site Administrators and Moderators
PUZZLED:
How can I search for posts on 'VI' if by the new rules (or maybe they are old) I get the messge:
"The search term you specified (vi) is under the minimum word length (3) and therefore will not be found. Please make this term longer.
If this term contains a wildcard, please make... (13 Replies)
Discussion started by: sierra_aar
13 Replies
2. Post Here to Contact Site Administrators and Moderators
Of late, when i start www.unix.com my system is
going to 100% CPU and takes lot of time to get
the information. I think this is happening after
adding the graphics on the page. Has anyone seen
this problem..Sorry to post this here.. (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: sssow
6 Replies
3. Answers to Frequently Asked Questions
Every now and then our users post complete programs to this site. It is especially important that these contributions don't get lost, so I will collect them here. Some of these programs are intended to demonstrate a programming technique and some are ready to run. As a guideline, the code... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: Perderabo
0 Replies
4. Forum Support Area for Unregistered Users & Account Problems
Folks,
Hope this is not a newbie question, but it might end up being that.
I wanted to retrieve the source code for unix_linux_bench as directed on https://www.unix.com/linux-benchmarks/11175-instructions-linux-benchmarks.html
When one clicks on the links specified for download, the browser... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: wagdalule
1 Replies
5. Post Here to Contact Site Administrators and Moderators
I've been having a problem connecting to the forum. I know it is just something with my computer but I have no idea what it is. It started last week.
Every time I connect I get this:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1" ?>
- <rss version="2.0"... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: Vi-Curious
2 Replies
LEARN ABOUT REDHAT
xmdropsiteconfigurestackingorder
XmDropSiteConfigureStackingOrder(library call) XmDropSiteConfigureStackingOrder(library call)
NAME
XmDropSiteConfigureStackingOrder -- A Drag and Drop function that reorders a stack of widgets that are registered drop sites
SYNOPSIS
#include <Xm/DragDrop.h>
void XmDropSiteConfigureStackingOrder(
Widget widget,
Widget sibling,
Cardinal stack_mode);
DESCRIPTION
XmDropSiteConfigureStackingOrder changes the stacking order of the drop site specified by widget. The stacking order controls the manner in
which drag-under effects are clipped by overlapping siblings, regardless of whether they are active. The stack mode is relative either to
the entire stack, or to another drop site within the stack. The stack order can be modified only if the drop sites are siblings in both the
widget and drop site hierarchy, and the widget parent of the drop sites is registered as a composite drop site.
widget Specifies the drop site to be restacked.
sibling Specifies a sibling drop site for stacking operations. If specified, then widget is restacked relative to this drop site's stack
position.
stack_mode
Specifies the new stack position for the specified widget. The values are XmABOVE and XmBELOW. If a sibling is specified, then
widget is restacked as follows:
XmABOVE The widget is placed just above the sibling.
XmBELOW The widget is placed just below the sibling.
If the sibling parameter is not specified, then widget is restacked as follows:
XmABOVE The widget is placed at the top of the stack.
XmBELOW The widget is placed at the bottom of the stack.
For a complete definition of DropSite and its associated resources, see XmDropSite(3).
RELATED
XmDropSite(3), XmDropSiteRetrieve(3), and XmDropSiteQueryStackingOrder(3).
XmDropSiteConfigureStackingOrder(library call)