Sponsored Content
Operating Systems Linux Red Hat Does it make sense to reduce the total shared memory Post 302992250 by gandolf989 on Thursday 23rd of February 2017 10:40:13 AM
Old 02-23-2017
Hi Robin, We are mostly using Oracle 11.2.0.3 and 12.1.0.2. Some of our servers are in the AWS cloud and I can change OS parameters there. But for the servers that are running out of our server room, I need to justify any OS changes that I want. By default the servers allocate half the total memory to shared memory whether or not we are using AMM, or shared memory. Hence, I am trying to figure out what benefits we would get from shrinking /dev/shm on servers where we aren't using shared memory. Would it even make a difference.

---------- Post updated at 10:40 AM ---------- Previous update was at 10:11 AM ----------

For example, I increased the AMM memory on two databases on this server
from 1GB to 3GB, and the total memory allocated when down.

It just seems like Redhat is holding onto shared memory that would be better
off not being shred memory, thus reducing the amount of swap being used.
There are 12 databases on this server, most do not use shared memory.

Code:
BEFORE INCREASE
$: ~ > free -m
             total       used       free     shared    buffers     cached
Mem:         32186      31987        198          0        872      26785
-/+ buffers/cache:       4329      27856
Swap:        20474       4340      16133

$: ~ > df -h /dev/shm
Filesystem            Size  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
tmpfs                  26G  5.4G   20G  22% /dev/shm

AFTER INCREASE
$: ~/scripts/sql > free -m
             total       used       free     shared    buffers     cached
Mem:         32186      29764       2421          0       1038      24912
-/+ buffers/cache:       3813      28372
Swap:        20474       4254      16220

$: ~/scripts/sql > df -h /dev/shm
Filesystem            Size  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
tmpfs                  26G  8.1G   18G  32% /dev/shm

 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

Shared memory shortage but lots of unused memory

I am running HP-UX B.11.11. I'm increasing a parameter for a database engine so that it uses more memory to buffer the disk drive (to speed up performance). I have over 5GB of memory not being used. But when I try to start the DB with the increased buffer parameter I get told. "Not... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: cjcamaro
1 Replies

2. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

How to reduce GZIP memory usage

I am using the ZLIB_VERSION "1.2.3" . The memory requirement for Zlib/GZIP compression is stated as /* The memory requirements for deflate are (in bytes): (1 << (windowBits+2)) + (1 << (memLevel+9)) that is: 128K for windowBits=15 + 128K for memLevel = 8 (default values) ... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: Parmod Garg
0 Replies

3. High Performance Computing

Rocks clusters make sense for educational environments

08-18-2008 11:00 AM Cluster computing has played a pivotal role in the way research is conducted in educational environments. Because the amount of available money and hardware varies between university researchers, often it's necessary to find a clustering solution that can work well on a small... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: Linux Bot
0 Replies

4. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

a for loop that doesn't make sense

I've been referring bash info for processes and came across a structure for a process which is defined like typedef struct process { struct process *next; char ** argv . . . }process; What I don't understand is that in the program there's a for loop which goes like this job... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: sdsd
2 Replies

5. Solaris

How to find Total and Free Physical Memory and Logical Memory in SOLARIS 9

Hi, Im working on Solaris 9 on SPARC-32 bit running on an Ultra-80, and I have to find out the following:- 1. Total Physical Memory in the system(total RAM). 2. Available Physical Memory(i.e. RAM Usage) 3. Total (Logical) Memory in the system 4. Available (Logical) Memory. I know... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: 0ktalmagik
4 Replies

6. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

trying to make sense of rsync output...

I'm running the following rsync command to sync a directory between the 2 servers: rsync -az --delete --stats /some_dir/ server_name:/some_dir I'm getting the following output: Number of files: 655174 Number of files transferred: 14221 Total file size: 1138531979331 bytes Total... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: GKnight
0 Replies

7. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

sar -d output... does not make sense

Can someone explain the correlation between how sar names the disk drives and how the rest of the OS names the disk drives? sar lists my disk drives as sd0, sd1, sd2, etc..... while format lists my disk drives as c1t0d0, c1t1d0, c1t2d0,etc... And also why sar shows 8 disks but format... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: s ladd
2 Replies

8. Programming

Shared library with acces to shared memory.

Hello. I am new to this forum and I would like to ask for advice about low level POSIX programming. I have to implement a POSIX compliant C shared library. A file will have some variables and the shared library will have some functions which need those variables. There is one special... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: iamjag
5 Replies

9. Cybersecurity

Root login in Linux - does it make sense?

I stumbled upon this thread and one aspect of it got me thinking. As i am building a small Linux network right now for a friend i would like to hear your opinion on this. I'd like to respectfully disagree. I think the Linux habit of disabling root login per default is wrong (not entirely... (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: bakunin
6 Replies

10. AIX

AIX flag to reduce size of shared file

I am using xlC (Version: 11.01.0000.0011). While build i am using "-g" to have debug information in build. there are many object files (>500) due to which resultant shared file (.so) will have huge size. I can't reduce optimization level. Is there any way or flag is present by using which i... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: Abhi04
2 Replies
SHMGET(2)						      BSD System Calls Manual							 SHMGET(2)

NAME
shmget -- get shared memory area identifier SYNOPSIS
#include <sys/shm.h> int shmget(key_t key, size_t size, int shmflg); DESCRIPTION
shmget() returns the shared memory identifier associated with the key key. A shared memory segment is created if either key is equal to IPC_PRIVATE, or key does not have a shared memory segment identifier associated with it, and the IPC_CREAT bit is set in shmflg. If a new shared memory segment is created, the data structure associated with it (the shmid_ds structure, see shmctl(2)) is initialized as follows: o shm_perm.cuid and shm_perm.uid are set to the effective uid of the calling process. o shm_perm.gid and shm_perm.cgid are set to the effective gid of the calling process. o shm_perm.mode is set to the lower 9 bits of shmflg. o shm_lpid, shm_nattch, shm_atime, and shm_dtime are set to 0 o shm_ctime is set to the current time. o shm_segsz is set to the value of size. o The ftok(3) function may be used to generate a key from a pathname. RETURN VALUES
Upon successful completion a positive shared memory segment identifier is returned. Otherwise, -1 is returned and the global variable errno is set to indicate the error. ERRORS
The shmget() system call will fail if: [EACCES] A shared memory segment is already associated with key and the caller has no permission to access it. [EEXIST] Both IPC_CREAT and IPC_EXCL are set in shmflg, and a shared memory segment is already associated with key. [EINVAL] No shared memory segment is to be created, and a shared memory segment exists for key, but the size of the segment associ- ated with it is less than size, which is non-zero. [ENOENT] IPC_CREAT was not set in shmflg and no shared memory segment associated with key was found. [ENOMEM] There is not enough memory left to created a shared memory segment of the requested size. [ENOSPC] A new shared memory identifier could not be created because the system limit for the number of shared memory identifiers has been reached. LEGACY SYNOPSIS
#include <sys/types.h> #include <sys/ipc.h> #include <sys/shm.h> int shmget(key_t key, int size, int shmflg); All of these include files are necessary. The type of size has changed. SEE ALSO
ftok(3), shmat(2), shmctl(2), shmdt(2), compat(5) BSD
August 17, 1995 BSD
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:58 AM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy