Hi folks.
I have a problem that I need to remove CLOSE_WAIT connections.
On AIX version 5.x, I can use rmsock command.
Is there a similar command on Solaris ? Is there an other solution for this situation ?
Thanks. (6 Replies)
Hi,
I have an application with a bug in it that keeps sockets in CLOSE_WAIT, which eventually freezes the server because the user account it runs under runs out of file handles. We have the bug fixed but can only release the fix with the next release.
Does anyone know how I can clear the... (3 Replies)
Hi Guys,
Just wondering if anyone of you have been in a situation where you end up having around 100 close_wait connections and seems to me those connections are locking up resources/processes in the server so unless the server is rebooted those processes won't be released by the close_wait... (3 Replies)
Hi,
Occasionally I am getting the port state in CLOSE_WAIT for long time in the solaris server. I am not sure is it application problem or not. Because we are using port 9009 for Tomcat process in our web application, some time when I start the application, the port 9009 is in CLOSE_WAIT... (0 Replies)
Hi,
Occasionally I am getting the port state in CLOSE_WAIT for long time in the solaris server. I am not sure is it application problem or not. Because we are using port 9009 for Tomcat process in our web application, some time when I start the application, the port 9009 is in CLOSE_WAIT... (2 Replies)
Hi,
We are using a application which uses port in CLOSE_WAIT Status.
netstat -an|grep 9191
192.168.32.11.9191 192.168.32.11.54562 49152 0 49152 0 CLOSE_WAIT
192.168.32.11.9191 192.168.32.11.54564 49152 0 49152 0 CLOSE_WAIT
192.168.32.11.9191 192.168.32.11.54568 ... (2 Replies)
Hi,
I am running JBOSS 6 ona RHEL5 server put it continuously crashes due to the number of CLOSE_WAIT connections on port 8080.
How can I kill the several hundred CLOSE_WAIT connections without killing the actual live "LISTENING" connection?
R,
D. (2 Replies)
Solaris 10 Sparc:
When you got a connection locking a tcp/port, and the status is CLOSE_WAIT (for ever :wall:), you just use the tcpdrop, to close the connection.
This is a OS bug. I wrote the bug id bellow:
BUG-ID
6468753 connections stuck in CLOSE_WAIT
The patch that's correct the bug:... (0 Replies)
Hello Friends,
First of all im sorry for spending extra space in DB of forum with this thread, i know there would be a solution if i kept searching,
I need to terminate the process which causes CLOSE_WAIT status of TCP connection via port 8103:
-bash-3.00$ netstat -na | grep 8103... (3 Replies)
Hi
The clients connect to my server -using port 9130. But no client could connect to my server at this time. I've checked already and this is the result
netstat -Aan|grep -v 127.0.0.1|grep 9130|pg
f10006000abcb398 tcp4 10313 0 10.0.89.81.9130 10.158.70.24.1705 CLOSE_WAIT... (8 Replies)
Discussion started by: bobochacha29
8 Replies
LEARN ABOUT DEBIAN
bup-margin
bup-margin(1) General Commands Manual bup-margin(1)NAME
bup-margin - figure out your deduplication safety margin
SYNOPSIS
bup margin [options...]
DESCRIPTION
bup margin iterates through all objects in your bup repository, calculating the largest number of prefix bits shared between any two
entries. This number, n, identifies the longest subset of SHA-1 you could use and still encounter a collision between your object ids.
For example, one system that was tested had a collection of 11 million objects (70 GB), and bup margin returned 45. That means a 46-bit
hash would be sufficient to avoid all collisions among that set of objects; each object in that repository could be uniquely identified by
its first 46 bits.
The number of bits needed seems to increase by about 1 or 2 for every doubling of the number of objects. Since SHA-1 hashes have 160 bits,
that leaves 115 bits of margin. Of course, because SHA-1 hashes are essentially random, it's theoretically possible to use many more bits
with far fewer objects.
If you're paranoid about the possibility of SHA-1 collisions, you can monitor your repository by running bup margin occasionally to see if
you're getting dangerously close to 160 bits.
OPTIONS --predict
Guess the offset into each index file where a particular object will appear, and report the maximum deviation of the correct answer
from the guess. This is potentially useful for tuning an interpolation search algorithm.
--ignore-midx
don't use .midx files, use only .idx files. This is only really useful when used with --predict.
EXAMPLE
$ bup margin
Reading indexes: 100.00% (1612581/1612581), done.
40
40 matching prefix bits
1.94 bits per doubling
120 bits (61.86 doublings) remaining
4.19338e+18 times larger is possible
Everyone on earth could have 625878182 data sets
like yours, all in one repository, and we would
expect 1 object collision.
$ bup margin --predict
PackIdxList: using 1 index.
Reading indexes: 100.00% (1612581/1612581), done.
915 of 1612581 (0.057%)
SEE ALSO bup-midx(1), bup-save(1)BUP
Part of the bup(1) suite.
AUTHORS
Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@gmail.com>.
Bup unknown-bup-margin(1)