Sponsored Content
Top Forums UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users Ksh93 on Linux compatible with ksh93 on AIX Post 302984069 by Keith Turley on Thursday 20th of October 2016 11:05:32 AM
Old 10-20-2016
yes I have considered the possibility that some programs or commands maybe different. Do you know of any automation tools that can examine shell scripts and list utilised commands and programs to make the analysis easier? There are about 25 scripts doing various functions mainly file system commands such as copying files, sed, invoking sqlplus, grep etc.....
 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Shell Programming and Scripting

Strange array handling in ksh93

I wrote a script in ksh93 (the OS is AIX 5.2, ML7), which failed to run. After some testing i found out why, but the answer is a bit dissatisfying. Look for yourself: #!/bin/ksh93 # --------- Step Names typeset achStepName="foo" typeset achStepName="bar" typeset achStepName="fubar"... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: bakunin
3 Replies

2. Shell Programming and Scripting

ksh93 deprecation...

Any means of running ksh93 in a ksh88-mode? Might sound odd, but I want/need to restrict U/Win-developed scripts to correspond to the ksh88 version on my Solaris environment(s). Thanks. (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: curleb
2 Replies

3. Shell Programming and Scripting

ksh88 or ksh93

Hi all! Does anybody know how can I check if any UNIX installation has implemented ksh88 or ksh93? Thanks in advance. Néstor. (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: Nestor
3 Replies

4. Shell Programming and Scripting

Performance degradation with KSH93

Hi, I have a script that calls an external program to perform some calculations and then I read with "grep" and "sed" values from the output files. I've noticed that performance of KSH93 degrades with every iteration. The output files are all the same size, so I don't understand why after the... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: i.f.schulz
2 Replies

5. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

Install ksh93 for cygwin

Hi, Does anyone know where can I get ksh93 for installation on CYGWIN. Thanks? (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: devtakh
1 Replies

6. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

ksh93 newline character problem

Hi , I am working on Linux, with ksh93 installed. The following statement echo \\n just prints \n on this shell. However on pdksh echo \\n gives a blank new line as a output. What is the correct way of printing a new line character on the ksh93? (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: neeto
4 Replies

7. Shell Programming and Scripting

ksh93 different results using -x option

This problem seems to be specific to ksh93. If you run with set -x some scripts don't work properly. For example: $ cat ksh.test2 ] && print FUBAR! || print OK! $ $ /bin/ksh93 ksh.test2 OK! $ /bin/ksh93 -x ksh.test2 + ] + print FUBAR! FUBAR! $ Trying to find out why this is... (8 Replies)
Discussion started by: lthorson
8 Replies

8. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

Embed tcl in ksh93 script

Hello everyone, I am trying to embed some tcl code inside a ksh93 script but I am not having any success. I even tried the simplest of code, something like this: . . jk=$(echo $(tcl << | write_file junkme "test"' | )) just to see if a file gets written. When I run there are no errors, but ... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: gio001
3 Replies

9. Shell Programming and Scripting

Possible ksh93 Bug Expanding Variables?

My OS is Linux (kernel 4.08.something) and AIX (7100-04-01-1543), the used ksh versions are: ksh88: Version M-11/16/88f (AIX) ksh93: Version M 93t+ 2009-05-01 (AIX), Version M 93u (Linux) When writing a parser for stanza files in ksh i encountered a rather strange behavior. Here is a... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: bakunin
4 Replies

10. AIX

Ksh93/AIX compatibility

Hi everyone ! Im trying to know from wich version of AIX KSH93 is available ? Internet tell me 6.x and 7.x AIX are available, bue what about 5.x ? Is KSH93 available on AIX 5.x ? Is it the same way to manipulate variables as KSH93 on 7.x ? Thanks for your support and have a nice day ! (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: majinfrede
2 Replies
print(1)							   User Commands							  print(1)

NAME
print - shell built-in function to output characters to the screen or window SYNOPSIS
ksh print [-Rnprsu [n]] [arg]... ksh93 print [-Renprs] [-f format] [-u fd] [string...] DESCRIPTION
ksh The shell output mechanism. When no options are specified, or when an option followed by ' a - is specified, or when just - is specified, the arguments are printed on standard output as described by echo(1). ksh93 By default, print writes each string operand to standard output and appends a NEWLINE character. Unless, the -r, -R, or -f option is speciifed, each character in each string operand is processed specially as follows: a Alert character.  Backspace character. c Terminate output without appending NEWLINE. The remaining string operands are ignored. E Escape character (ASCII octal 033). f FORM FEED character. NEWLINE character. Tab character. v Vertical tab character. \ Backslash character. x The 8-bit character whose ASCII code is the 1-, 2-, or 3-digit octal number x. OPTIONS
ksh The following options are supported by ksh: -n Suppresses new-line from being added to the output. -r-R Raw mode. Ignore the escape conventions of echo. The -R option prints all subsequent arguments and options other than -n. -p Cause the arguments to be written onto the pipe of the process spawned with |& instead of standard output. -s Cause the arguments to be written onto the history file instead of standard output. -u [ n ] Specify a one digit file descriptor unit number n on which the output is placed. The default is 1. ksh93 The following options are supported by ksh93: -e Unless -f is specified, process sequences in each string operand as described above. This is the default behavior. If both -e and -r are specified, the last one specified is the one that is used. -f format Write the string arguments using the format string format and do not append a NEWLINE. See printf(1) for details on how to specify format. When the -f option is specified and there are more string operands than format specifiers, the format string is reprocessed from the beginning. If there are fewer string operands than format specifiers, then outputting ends at the first unneeded for- mat specifier. -n Do not append a NEWLINE character to the output. -p Write to the current co-process instead of standard output. -r Do not process sequences in each string operand as described above. -R If both -e and -r are specified, the last one specified is the one that is used. -s Write the output as an entry in the shell history file instead of standard output. -u fd Write to file descriptor number fd instead of standard output. The default value is 1. EXIT STATUS
The following exit values are returned: 0 Successful completion. >0 Output file is not open for writing. ATTRIBUTES
See attributes(5) for descriptions of the following attributes: +-----------------------------+-----------------------------+ | ATTRIBUTE TYPE | ATTRIBUTE VALUE | +-----------------------------+-----------------------------+ |Availability |SUNWcsu | +-----------------------------+-----------------------------+ SEE ALSO
echo(1), ksh(1), ksh93(1), printf(1), attributes(5) SunOS 5.11 27 Mar 2008 print(1)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:37 PM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy