Sponsored Content
Full Discussion: Peak Ram Usage
Top Forums UNIX for Beginners Questions & Answers Peak Ram Usage Post 302983395 by RudiC on Tuesday 11th of October 2016 03:26:40 AM
Old 10-11-2016
If there are "too many errors to read", split the script into executable blocks and test run those, block by block, line by line if need be.
 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Solaris

RAM Physical Memory usage by each Process.

Hi All, I am trying to find the physical memory usage by each process/users. Can you please let me know how to get the memory usage?. Thanks, bsraj. (12 Replies)
Discussion started by: bsrajirs
12 Replies

2. HP-UX

how can I find cpu usage memory usage swap usage and logical volume usage

how can I find cpu usage memory usage swap usage and I want to know CPU usage above X% and contiue Y times and memory usage above X % and contiue Y times my final destination is monitor process logical volume usage above X % and number of Logical voluage above can I not to... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: alert0919
3 Replies

3. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Command to check RAM usage

Hi Guys, How can i check the RAM usage for a particular user on the Linux machine. What command can be used. Thanks in advance, Swapna (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: Swapna173
1 Replies

4. Shell Programming and Scripting

RAM usage Information

Hi i just wanted to know what is the code to display amount of RAM and also the percentage used? I know i can possibly use the vmstat code but what part indicates the RAM? Any help would be much appreciated. Thanks (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: warlock129
1 Replies

5. Linux

Ram Usage

Hi one of our applications that runs on our Linux server leaks memory resulting in Ram that was used by the program not being released back to the operating system once a file has been processed. the result is over a very short period virtual all the memory has been used. an example currently ... (8 Replies)
Discussion started by: treds
8 Replies

6. Solaris

Server RAM Usage checkup & support

Hi RAM of my system is 24 GB however when i checked the processes pids and counted the memory usage by pmap i found out that the total memory usage is 36 GB It s obvious that my system might be using some of virtual memory or swap space . How can i check which memory it is using and how .. ... (9 Replies)
Discussion started by: Paarth
9 Replies

7. Red Hat

High RAM usage, extremely low swapping

Hi team I have three physical servers running on Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 6.2 with the following memory conditions: # cat /proc/meminfo | grep -i mem MemTotal: 8062888 kB MemFree: 184540 kB Shmem: 516 kB and the following swap conditions: ... (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: hedkandi
6 Replies

8. OS X (Apple)

RAM Usage discrepancy

Hey there! I'm a new user here who registered because I couldn't get these kind of questions answered in the place I directly com from. :o I've found a discrepancy in total RAM used and I can't figure out why it is. My only guess is there are some RAM used by some stuff impossible to identify,... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: dasx
2 Replies

9. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Average CPU and RAM usage for a process

Hi, I will be creating a process myself and I want to know the average CPU and RAM used by the process over the lifetime of the process. I see that there are various tools available(pidstat) for doing , I was wondering if it possible to do it in a single command while creation. Thanks in... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: koustubh
3 Replies

10. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

Ubuntu 14.04 - how to less ram usage

Hello, I have an ubuntu14.04 installed pc with 32GB ram. Operating System: Ubuntu 14.04.5 LTS Kernel: Linux 4.9.148-xxxx-std-ipv6-64 Architecture: x86_64 When I check free memory it shows: total used free shared buffers cached Mem: 31882 ... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: baris35
2 Replies
BADBLOCKS(8)                                                  System Manager's Manual                                                 BADBLOCKS(8)

NAME
badblocks - search a device for bad blocks SYNOPSIS
badblocks [ -svwnfBX ] [ -b block_size ] [ -c blocks_at_once ] [ -d read_delay_factor ] [ -e max_bad_blocks ] [ -i input_file ] [ -o out- put_file ] [ -p num_passes ] [ -t test_pattern ] device [ last_block ] [ first_block ] DESCRIPTION
badblocks is used to search for bad blocks on a device (usually a disk partition). device is the special file corresponding to the device (e.g /dev/hdc1). last_block is the last block to be checked; if it is not specified, the last block on the device is used as a default. first_block is an optional parameter specifying the starting block number for the test, which allows the testing to start in the middle of the disk. If it is not specified the first block on the disk is used as a default. Important note: If the output of badblocks is going to be fed to the e2fsck or mke2fs programs, it is important that the block size is properly specified, since the block numbers which are generated are very dependent on the block size in use by the filesystem. For this reason, it is strongly recommended that users not run badblocks directly, but rather use the -c option of the e2fsck and mke2fs programs. OPTIONS
-b block_size Specify the size of blocks in bytes. The default is 1024. -c number of blocks is the number of blocks which are tested at a time. The default is 64. -d read delay factor This parameter, if passed and non-zero, will cause bad blocks to sleep between reads if there were no errors encountered in the read operation; the delay will be calculated as a percentage of the time it took for the read operation to be performed. In other words, a value of 100 will cause each read to be delayed by the amount the previous read took, and a value of 200 by twice the amount. -e max bad block count Specify a maximum number of bad blocks before aborting the test. The default is 0, meaning the test will continue until the end of the test range is reached. -f Normally, badblocks will refuse to do a read/write or a non-destructive test on a device which is mounted, since either can cause the system to potentially crash and/or damage the filesystem even if it is mounted read-only. This can be overridden using the -f flag, but should almost never be used --- if you think you're smarter than the badblocks program, you almost certainly aren't. The only time when this option might be safe to use is if the /etc/mtab file is incorrect, and the device really isn't mounted. -i input_file Read a list of already existing known bad blocks. Badblocks will skip testing these blocks since they are known to be bad. If input_file is specified as "-", the list will be read from the standard input. Blocks listed in this list will be omitted from the list of new bad blocks produced on the standard output or in the output file. The -b option of dumpe2fs(8) can be used to retrieve the list of blocks currently marked bad on an existing filesystem, in a format suitable for use with this option. -n Use non-destructive read-write mode. By default only a non-destructive read-only test is done. This option must not be combined with the -w option, as they are mutually exclusive. -o output_file Write the list of bad blocks to the specified file. Without this option, badblocks displays the list on its standard output. The format of this file is suitable for use by the -l option in e2fsck(8) or mke2fs(8). -p num_passes Repeat scanning the disk until there are no new blocks discovered in num_passes consecutive scans of the disk. Default is 0, mean- ing badblocks will exit after the first pass. -s Show the progress of the scan by writing out rough percentage completion of the current badblocks pass over the disk. Note that badblocks may do multiple test passes over the disk, in particular if the -p or -w option is requested by the user. -t test_pattern Specify a test pattern to be read (and written) to disk blocks. The test_pattern may either be a numeric value between 0 and ULONG_MAX-1 inclusive, or the word "random", which specifies that the block should be filled with a random bit pattern. For read/write (-w) and non-destructive (-n) modes, one or more test patterns may be specified by specifying the -t option for each test pattern desired. For read-only mode only a single pattern may be specified and it may not be "random". Read-only testing with a pattern assumes that the specified pattern has previously been written to the disk - if not, large numbers of blocks will fail veri- fication. If multiple patterns are specified then all blocks will be tested with one pattern before proceeding to the next pattern. -v Verbose mode. Will write the number of read errors, write errors and data- corruptions to stderr. -w Use write-mode test. With this option, badblocks scans for bad blocks by writing some patterns (0xaa, 0x55, 0xff, 0x00) on every block of the device, reading every block and comparing the contents. This option may not be combined with the -n option, as they are mutually exclusive. -B Use buffered I/O and do not use Direct I/O, even if it is available. -X Internal flag only to be used by e2fsck(8) and mke2fs(8). It bypasses the exclusive mode in-use device safety check. WARNING
Never use the -w option on a device containing an existing file system. This option erases data! If you want to do write-mode testing on an existing file system, use the -n option instead. It is slower, but it will preserve your data. The -e option will cause badblocks to output a possibly incomplete list of bad blocks. Therefore it is recommended to use it only when one wants to know if there are any bad blocks at all on the device, and not when the list of bad blocks is wanted. AUTHOR
badblocks was written by Remy Card <Remy.Card@linux.org>. Current maintainer is Theodore Ts'o <tytso@alum.mit.edu>. Non-destructive read/write test implemented by David Beattie <dbeattie@softhome.net>. AVAILABILITY
badblocks is part of the e2fsprogs package and is available from http://e2fsprogs.sourceforge.net. SEE ALSO
e2fsck(8), mke2fs(8) E2fsprogs version 1.44.1 March 2018 BADBLOCKS(8)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:54 PM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy