|
|
Sponsored Content
Operating Systems
Solaris
Luxadm display not showing a LUN as expected
Post 302976166 by ludiegu on Friday 24th of June 2016 11:56:37 AM
06-24-2016
@Gull04
I don't think so, as the same number of LUN is in an OK state on the other node of this cluster.
@Peasant
Correct, path are OK on format, but not on luxadm. As stated, the same OS is on the other node of the cluster, and the LUN is ok.
Veritas recognize the different paths of the "broken" disk as different ones, and here is my true problem
@achenle
The names are ibm_ds8x002_6146 for the "broken" one and ibm_ds8x002_4900 for the "correct" one.
Is there any way to "force" the luxadm infos?
Thanks!
--
Diego
I don't think so, as the same number of LUN is in an OK state on the other node of this cluster.
@Peasant
Correct, path are OK on format, but not on luxadm. As stated, the same OS is on the other node of the cluster, and the LUN is ok.
Veritas recognize the different paths of the "broken" disk as different ones, and here is my true problem
@achenle
The names are ibm_ds8x002_6146 for the "broken" one and ibm_ds8x002_4900 for the "correct" one.
Is there any way to "force" the luxadm infos?
Thanks!
--
Diego
|
|
9 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting
1. Solaris
I have a list of LUN ID, my task is to find if disk has been added or not. How do I do that? I have been searching the forum and not able to find answer.
thanks (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: uuontario
4 Replies
2. Solaris
I have a new SAN (Fujitsu Eternus 2000) and am trying to setup a veritas cluster on it, however veritas does not see all of the vluns I have exposed to the box. The OS does see them though. I have seen a lot of post about this, but it seems they are about people having just the opposite problem... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: timothy.edwards
0 Replies
3. Solaris
Hi Gurus out there...
I am pondering over a situation where I have non-root access (user account), where I am trying to determine paths (including multipaths) on a host.
"luxadm display" seems very appropriate, but requires root access.
Is there anyway I can get the FC path information?
... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: verisund
1 Replies
4. Shell Programming and Scripting
i have lunix 5.4
i make script to tack the export from database 11g by oracle user
the oracle sheel is /bin/bash
when run this script display this error
./daily_xport_prod: line 36:
the daily_xport_prod script
#! /bin/sh
#
ORACLE_HOME=/u01/appl/oracle/product/11.2.0/db_1
export... (8 Replies)
Discussion started by: m_salah
8 Replies
5. Solaris
Hi, I have a question regarding HBA configuration. Here are the commands' output:
# cfgadm -al | grep fc
c1 fc-fabric connected unconfigured unknown
c2 fc connected unconfigured unknown
c5 ... (11 Replies)
Discussion started by: aixlover
11 Replies
6. Solaris
Hi,
I've noticed that mpathadm states that one of our luns has no active paths:
/dev/rdsk/c6t60000970000298700009533031324333d0s2
Total Path Count: 4
Operational Path Count: 4
/dev/rdsk/c6t60000970000298700009533031333037d0s2
... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: badoshi
3 Replies
7. Solaris
Hello,
I have Solaris 10 running on one of rack server with dual port FC card. Each port of FC card is connected to two switches respectively. I have been trying to test multipathing functionality with one of FC Storage.
While I have two storage controllers , each connected to the two switches... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: linuxfreaker
0 Replies
8. Solaris
Hello,
I have Solaris 10 running on one of rack server with dual port FC card. Each port of FC card is connected to two switches respectively. I have been trying to test multipathing functionality with one of FC Storage.
While I have two storage controllers , each connected to the two switches... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: linuxfreaker
2 Replies
9. Solaris
How can i remove LUN's from solaris 10 those are unmapped from SAN?
from storage side i got confirmation that they removed lun. but in my solaris box still it's visible.
i tried below.
root@globalares2.example.com #luxadm -e offline /dev/rdsk/c2t600D02310007D16C42FF09E24B5B8255d0s2... (7 Replies)
Discussion started by: bentech4u
7 Replies
LEARN ABOUT DEBIAN
mkqdisk
mkqdisk(8) Quorum Disk Management mkqdisk(8) NAME
mkqdisk - Cluster Quorum Disk Utility WARNING
Use of this command can cause the cluster to malfunction. SYNOPSIS
mkqdisk [-?|-h] | [-L] | [-f label] [-c device -l label] [-d [-d ...]] DESCRIPTION
The mkqdisk command is used to create a new quorum disk or display existing quorum disks accessible from a given cluster node. OPTIONS
-c device -l label Initialize a new cluster quorum disk. This will destroy all data on the given device. If a cluster is currently using that device as a quorum disk, the entire cluster will malfunction. Do not run this on an active cluster when qdiskd is running. Only one device on the SAN should ever have the given label; using multiple different devices is currently not supported (it is expected a RAID array is used for quorum disk redundancy). The label can be any textual string up to 127 characters - and is therefore enough space to hold a UUID created with uuidgen(1). -f label Find the cluster quorum disk with the given label and display information about it. -L Display information on all accessible cluster quorum disks. -d Increase debugging level. Specify multiple times for more information. Currently, specifying more than twice has no effect. SEE ALSO
qdisk(5), qdiskd(8), uuidgen(1) July 2006 mkqdisk(8)