Issue with luxadm?

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Operating Systems Solaris Issue with luxadm?
# 1  
Old 01-02-2014
Issue with luxadm?


I have Solaris 10 running on one of rack server with dual port FC card. Each port of FC card is connected to two switches respectively. I have been trying to test multipathing functionality with one of FC Storage.
While I have two storage controllers , each connected to the two switches for multipathing. So I have altogether 4 ports from each controller of storage connected to switches which altogether makes 8 paths for multipathing.

My Storage has two controllers - Controller 0 and Controller 1. I created two LUNs each of size 120GB. The primary owner for LUN1 was made Controller-0 . When I tried to make primary owner for LUN2 as controller-1 it threw a warning and switches it back to Controller-0. The warning gets displayed in Storage Management Tool. I noticed that it happen after 1-2 minutes of time and sometimes whenever the system reboots.

Due to this, when I am trying to run luxadm display <devicename> it shows me Controller-0 serial number for both the devices.(ie. Controller-0).

I went ahead and tested multipathing functionality. When I removed one cable of HBA card from host end, the other is taking care and I am still able to access the directory structure and both the LUNs without any issue. As another test scenerio, when I tried to remove one controller, the other controller takes care and LUNs are still accessible. When I removed Controller-0 the luxadm display shows serial number for both the LUNS as "unsupported". While remove Controller-1, it showed serial number of Controller-0 successfully.

All I am concerned about luxadm display for controller-1 which shows the serial number of controller-0 instead.
And, while removing controller-0 it shows serial number as"Unsupported".I wonder if there is any command or script which can rescan the luxadm display (I just guess if this can be helpful here).

Please suggest.
# 2  
Old 01-08-2014
which is the Storage involved?

are you using the solaris native multipath or the software of the storage vendor?
# 3  
Old 01-08-2014
The storage is Dell MD 3620f and I am using Solaris native multi pathing stmsboot.
Login or Register to Ask a Question

Previous Thread | Next Thread

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Solaris

Luxadm display not showing a LUN as expected

Hi all, I have the following LUN which is showing OK with its two paths: DEVICE PROPERTIES for disk: /dev/rdsk/c23t500507630A3BC579d123s2 Vendor: IBM Product ID: 2107900 Revision: 3010 Serial Num: 75WB0114900 Unformatted capacity:... (13 Replies)
Discussion started by: ludiegu
13 Replies

2. Solaris

Luxadm displaying incorrect LUN parameter...

Hello, I have Solaris 10 running on one of rack server with dual port FC card. Each port of FC card is connected to two switches respectively. I have been trying to test multipathing functionality with one of FC Storage. While I have two storage controllers , each connected to the two switches... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: linuxfreaker
0 Replies

3. Shell Programming and Scripting

Variable value substitution issue with awk command issue

Hi All, I am using the below script which has awk command, but it is not returing the expected result. can some pls help me to correct the command. The below script sample.ksh should give the result if the value of last 4 digits in the variable NM matches with the variable value DAT. The... (7 Replies)
Discussion started by: G.K.K
7 Replies

4. Shell Programming and Scripting

Need assistance with a file issue and a terminal issue

Hello everyone, I'm in need of some assistance. I'm currently enrolled in an introductory UNIX shell programming course and, well halfway through the semester, we are receiving our first actual assignment. I've somewhat realized now that I've fallen behind, and I'm working to get caught up, but for... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: MrMagoo22
1 Replies

5. Solaris

SAN/Solaris: luxadm shows NOT CONNECTED

Hi, I have a question regarding HBA configuration. Here are the commands' output: # cfgadm -al | grep fc c1 fc-fabric connected unconfigured unknown c2 fc connected unconfigured unknown c5 ... (11 Replies)
Discussion started by: aixlover
11 Replies

6. Solaris

luxadm -e port shows one port not connected

hi i have a sun machine which has one hba 2ports; out of which one port says it is not connected # luxadm -e port /devices/pci@1d,700000/SUNW,qlc@1/fp@0,0:devctl CONNECTED /devices/pci@1d,700000/SUNW,qlc@1,1/fp@0,0:devctl NOT CONNECTED but both... (9 Replies)
Discussion started by: anwesh
9 Replies

7. Solaris

Non-Root mode ... luxadm to show path(s) for Disks

Hi Gurus out there... I am pondering over a situation where I have non-root access (user account), where I am trying to determine paths (including multipaths) on a host. "luxadm display" seems very appropriate, but requires root access. Is there anyway I can get the FC path information? ... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: verisund
1 Replies

8. Solaris

luxadm probe and vxdisk list don't matchup

I have a new SAN (Fujitsu Eternus 2000) and am trying to setup a veritas cluster on it, however veritas does not see all of the vluns I have exposed to the box. The OS does see them though. I have seen a lot of post about this, but it seems they are about people having just the opposite problem... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: timothy.edwards
0 Replies

9. Solaris

Solaris9 - qlogic HBAs - luxadm reports "Found path to 0 HBA ports"

Hi All, I'm actually trying to configure a Qlogic HBA on a solaris9 connecting in a Brocade SAN. I installed Solaris9 and now trying to look at FC devices.. bash-2.05# luxadm -e port Found path to 0 HBA ports bash-2.05# luxadm probe No Network Array enclosures found in /dev/es... (7 Replies)
Discussion started by: ilan
7 Replies

10. Shell Programming and Scripting

Unix Arithmatic operation issue , datatype issue

Hi, I have a shell scripting. This will take 7 digit number in each line and add 7 digit number with next subsequent lines ( normal addition ). Eg: 0000001 0000220 0001235 0000022 0000023 ........... ......... ........ Like this i am having around 1500000 records. After adding... (23 Replies)
Discussion started by: thambi
23 Replies
Login or Register to Ask a Question