Sponsored Content
Operating Systems Solaris Building X11 applications on Solaris 10 Post 302951290 by testers1717 on Tuesday 4th of August 2015 03:45:02 PM
Old 08-04-2015
Ultimately, I'm trying to build complex applications like Firefox, Emacs, gtk+ based tools, etc.

Currently I can only achieve this using a pkgsrc build environment which provides its own "modular-xorg" (and just about everything else except an initial c/c++ compiler) when compiling applications. If I try to build using Solaris's native x-libraries, most packages will break. I'm just trying to figure out if that's something that can be fixed by providing the simplest way to reproduce my breakage, building any simple x-application on Solaris (eg xeyes). I also am not sure what effect their modular-xorg has if I was to ever distribute a compiled binary to other Solaris 10 machines.

I'm new to both pkgsrc and advanced building so there's a lot that doesn't make sense and pkgsrc, though getting packages built quicker, adds a layer of abstraction which makes things more confusing when they break. I would like to avoid it if I can, but maybe I can't because I can't even build xeyes without it Smilie.

The question is the same as it was, how do you build [modern] x-applications on Solaris 10 if the development header files that come with most other platforms aren't there? I know that you've kind of answered this question above but your solution seems unfeasible given the quantity of packages which will not build before actually getting to the package which you need. It is also naturally impossible for a newbie like myself :|

I do appreciate all that you've answered so far though. It has helped me to somewhat further understand this new world of Unix/Solaris which I have recently been thrown into.

Last edited by testers1717; 08-04-2015 at 04:57 PM..
 
GIT-MERGE-BASE(1)						    Git Manual							 GIT-MERGE-BASE(1)

NAME
git-merge-base - Find as good common ancestors as possible for a merge SYNOPSIS
git merge-base [-a|--all] <commit> <commit>... git merge-base [-a|--all] --octopus <commit>... git merge-base --is-ancestor <commit> <commit> git merge-base --independent <commit>... DESCRIPTION
git merge-base finds best common ancestor(s) between two commits to use in a three-way merge. One common ancestor is better than another common ancestor if the latter is an ancestor of the former. A common ancestor that does not have any better common ancestor is a best common ancestor, i.e. a merge base. Note that there can be more than one merge base for a pair of commits. OPERATION MODE
As the most common special case, specifying only two commits on the command line means computing the merge base between the given two commits. More generally, among the two commits to compute the merge base from, one is specified by the first commit argument on the command line; the other commit is a (possibly hypothetical) commit that is a merge across all the remaining commits on the command line. As a consequence, the merge base is not necessarily contained in each of the commit arguments if more than two commits are specified. This is different from git-show-branch(1) when used with the --merge-base option. --octopus Compute the best common ancestors of all supplied commits, in preparation for an n-way merge. This mimics the behavior of git show-branch --merge-base. --independent Instead of printing merge bases, print a minimal subset of the supplied commits with the same ancestors. In other words, among the commits given, list those which cannot be reached from any other. This mimics the behavior of git show-branch --independent. --is-ancestor Check if the first <commit> is an ancestor of the second <commit>, and exit with status 0 if true, or with status 1 if not. Errors are signaled by a non-zero status that is not 1. OPTIONS
-a, --all Output all merge bases for the commits, instead of just one. DISCUSSION
Given two commits A and B, git merge-base A B will output a commit which is reachable from both A and B through the parent relationship. For example, with this topology: o---o---o---B / ---o---1---o---o---o---A the merge base between A and B is 1. Given three commits A, B and C, git merge-base A B C will compute the merge base between A and a hypothetical commit M, which is a merge between B and C. For example, with this topology: o---o---o---o---C / / o---o---o---B / / ---2---1---o---o---o---A the result of git merge-base A B C is 1. This is because the equivalent topology with a merge commit M between B and C is: o---o---o---o---o / / o---o---o---o---M / / ---2---1---o---o---o---A and the result of git merge-base A M is 1. Commit 2 is also a common ancestor between A and M, but 1 is a better common ancestor, because 2 is an ancestor of 1. Hence, 2 is not a merge base. The result of git merge-base --octopus A B C is 2, because 2 is the best common ancestor of all commits. When the history involves criss-cross merges, there can be more than one best common ancestor for two commits. For example, with this topology: ---1---o---A / X / ---2---o---o---B both 1 and 2 are merge-bases of A and B. Neither one is better than the other (both are best merge bases). When the --all option is not given, it is unspecified which best one is output. A common idiom to check "fast-forward-ness" between two commits A and B is (or at least used to be) to compute the merge base between A and B, and check if it is the same as A, in which case, A is an ancestor of B. You will see this idiom used often in older scripts. A=$(git rev-parse --verify A) if test "$A" = "$(git merge-base A B)" then ... A is an ancestor of B ... fi In modern git, you can say this in a more direct way: if git merge-base --is-ancestor A B then ... A is an ancestor of B ... fi instead. SEE ALSO
git-rev-list(1), git-show-branch(1), git-merge(1) GIT
Part of the git(1) suite Git 1.8.3.1 06/10/2014 GIT-MERGE-BASE(1)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:20 AM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy