Sponsored Content
Operating Systems HP-UX Test cases for file system mount/umount performance in HP Post 302945451 by Corona688 on Friday 29th of May 2015 11:53:58 AM
Old 05-29-2015
Are you actually having a problem, or just looking for hypothetical ones?
 

9 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Writing a script to mount and umount a drive in Linux

I have a 1 GB jazz drive. The jazz disk is used daily, both at home and at work on my Win 98 Server. So, I have to keep it in vfat format, which is fine because Linux rocks and will read it no problem. :-) However, I can't just stick the disk in the drive and open up the jazz folder in my mnt... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: wizkid
2 Replies

2. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

solaris 8 admin I text ambiguities on mount and umount

i'm prepping for my midterm, which i will bomb. i am scurrying to finish reading the final chapter before i get down into the review. however, i came across something in chapter 8 - "mounting file systems" that has me really confused. the text says the following: then it goes on to... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: xyyz
2 Replies

3. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

test cases

in my organisation the unix server is migrated.the ip of the server changed and the hardware.i need to test that i am aving the same file structure and data which is created under my user id.and the utilities like sqlplus,ftp are working or not.i am talking abt the general user perspective who... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: dr46014
0 Replies

4. Linux

How to mount/umount disk from a non-root account

Is it possible to mount a disk from a non-root account? I'm developing a Java application which executes commands in the shell using the java.lang.Runtime.exec api, which runs fine for commands ls, df, etc., but for commands mount and umount, i have problems as I need to be root to eecute these.... (8 Replies)
Discussion started by: brendan76
8 Replies

5. Solaris

mount & umount in sigle-user mode

In Solaris 8, when I boot to single user mode, mount a device and then reboot or init 0, the system unmount it automatically. However, in Solaris 10 it does not seem to do the same. Here is what I did: {0} ok boot -s # format Searching for disks...done AVAILABLE DISK SELECTIONS: 0.... (11 Replies)
Discussion started by: StarSol
11 Replies

6. Solaris

Filesystem - umount the / (root) file system

Hi all Is it ok to umount the / (root) file system? Because recently i had extend the swap space by add the cylinders, now only found that the cylinders is overlap with the root. Is it ok for future server operation? partition> print Current partition table (original): Total disk... (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: SmartAntz
6 Replies

7. Cybersecurity

Remove need for sudo for mount/umount

Hello, I'm trying to remove the need to use sudo to mount (in particular, binding). Modifying /etc/sudoers using visudo, I have tried: %admin ALL=NOPASSWD: /usr/bin/mount %admin ALL=NOPASSWD: /usr/bin/umountand %admin ALL=(ALL) NOPASSWD: /usr/bin/mount %admin ALL=(ALL) NOPASSWD:... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: Narnie
5 Replies

8. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Simple way to umount NFS mount in linux

Hello... I've mounted a share using standard nomenclature for the NFS mount command with the following command line: mount -t nfs -o rw {IP address1}:/ /mnt_for_70 / {IP address2}(rw) mnt_for_70 is a mount point I created on {IP address2} I'm confuse and want to be sure I use the... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: blaine.miller
1 Replies

9. Fedora

What is the right way to mount and umount a usb driver?

I have some questions: 1, I successfully mounted my usb drive with "sudo mount /dev/sdb1 /mnt", but I can't wirte, It says "read-only file system". But I can write it in windows. 2, After I umounted the usb drive the led of it still on, but not blinking. Is it safe to unplug it? How to let it's... (17 Replies)
Discussion started by: vistastar
17 Replies
GIT-MERGE-BASE(1)						    Git Manual							 GIT-MERGE-BASE(1)

NAME
git-merge-base - Find as good common ancestors as possible for a merge SYNOPSIS
git merge-base [-a|--all] <commit> <commit>... git merge-base [-a|--all] --octopus <commit>... git merge-base --is-ancestor <commit> <commit> git merge-base --independent <commit>... DESCRIPTION
git merge-base finds best common ancestor(s) between two commits to use in a three-way merge. One common ancestor is better than another common ancestor if the latter is an ancestor of the former. A common ancestor that does not have any better common ancestor is a best common ancestor, i.e. a merge base. Note that there can be more than one merge base for a pair of commits. OPERATION MODE
As the most common special case, specifying only two commits on the command line means computing the merge base between the given two commits. More generally, among the two commits to compute the merge base from, one is specified by the first commit argument on the command line; the other commit is a (possibly hypothetical) commit that is a merge across all the remaining commits on the command line. As a consequence, the merge base is not necessarily contained in each of the commit arguments if more than two commits are specified. This is different from git-show-branch(1) when used with the --merge-base option. --octopus Compute the best common ancestors of all supplied commits, in preparation for an n-way merge. This mimics the behavior of git show-branch --merge-base. --independent Instead of printing merge bases, print a minimal subset of the supplied commits with the same ancestors. In other words, among the commits given, list those which cannot be reached from any other. This mimics the behavior of git show-branch --independent. --is-ancestor Check if the first <commit> is an ancestor of the second <commit>, and exit with status 0 if true, or with status 1 if not. Errors are signaled by a non-zero status that is not 1. OPTIONS
-a, --all Output all merge bases for the commits, instead of just one. DISCUSSION
Given two commits A and B, git merge-base A B will output a commit which is reachable from both A and B through the parent relationship. For example, with this topology: o---o---o---B / ---o---1---o---o---o---A the merge base between A and B is 1. Given three commits A, B and C, git merge-base A B C will compute the merge base between A and a hypothetical commit M, which is a merge between B and C. For example, with this topology: o---o---o---o---C / / o---o---o---B / / ---2---1---o---o---o---A the result of git merge-base A B C is 1. This is because the equivalent topology with a merge commit M between B and C is: o---o---o---o---o / / o---o---o---o---M / / ---2---1---o---o---o---A and the result of git merge-base A M is 1. Commit 2 is also a common ancestor between A and M, but 1 is a better common ancestor, because 2 is an ancestor of 1. Hence, 2 is not a merge base. The result of git merge-base --octopus A B C is 2, because 2 is the best common ancestor of all commits. When the history involves criss-cross merges, there can be more than one best common ancestor for two commits. For example, with this topology: ---1---o---A / X / ---2---o---o---B both 1 and 2 are merge-bases of A and B. Neither one is better than the other (both are best merge bases). When the --all option is not given, it is unspecified which best one is output. A common idiom to check "fast-forward-ness" between two commits A and B is (or at least used to be) to compute the merge base between A and B, and check if it is the same as A, in which case, A is an ancestor of B. You will see this idiom used often in older scripts. A=$(git rev-parse --verify A) if test "$A" = "$(git merge-base A B)" then ... A is an ancestor of B ... fi In modern git, you can say this in a more direct way: if git merge-base --is-ancestor A B then ... A is an ancestor of B ... fi instead. SEE ALSO
git-rev-list(1), git-show-branch(1), git-merge(1) GIT
Part of the git(1) suite Git 1.8.5.3 01/14/2014 GIT-MERGE-BASE(1)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:21 AM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy