You need to quote every variable expansion. Likely your $BaseForAveraging ends up with whitespace in it and awk sees that as the program to execute and the next parameter (your actual awk code) as a file to open to reading.
There are a lot of bad practices going on here. Please give us sample input and sample output and you can likely do this a lot cleaner with just 1 invocation of awk.
Hi Neutronscott,
Thanks for your reply.
I have a data file, in which there are 48 repetitions of the following block of data.
In each block, there are 2 parts: "Direct signal" and "Cross-talk" (I have bolded them).
I then extract two sets of information (I underlined them) under only the "Direct signal" section.
1. Number of signal records
2. Data (1st column: time // 2nd column: data value)
Data consists of two columns. I divide each value in the second column by the number of signal records.
Therefore, for each block, I will get 2 columns of data. It is known that the 1st column (time) of each block is the same.
The last step is to add the 2nd columns of every three consecutive blocks up, and tabulate the result. I will get 48/3 = 16 "added" columns. I will finally insert a first column back.
This is what I am trying to implement.
By quoting the variables, do I have to replace every $var with "$var"?
Hi,
I need to paste each 10 lines of single column to several columns.
Please, can anyone tell me how to write in awk?
Input File:
22
34
36
12
17
19
15
11
89
99
56
38
29 (4 Replies)
Hello,
I have 2 columns (1st column has multiple entries but the corresponding values in the column 2 may be the same or different.) however I want to extract unique values for each entry in column 1 by assigning the max value from column 2
SDF4 -0.211654
SDF4 0.978068
... (1 Reply)
Hi,
I need an awk script (or whatever shell-construct) that would take data like below and get the max value of 3 column, when grouping by the 1st column.
clientname,day-of-month,max-users
-----------------------------------
client1,20120610,5
client2,20120610,2
client3,20120610,7... (3 Replies)
Hey folks. I wrote a little awk script that summarizes /proc/net/dev info and then pipes it to the nix column command to set up column spacing appropriately.
Here's some example output:
Iface RxMBytes RxPackets RxErrs RxDrop TxMBytes TxPackets TxErrs TxDrop
bond0 9 83830... (3 Replies)
Hi,
My input files is like this
axis1 0 1 10
axis2 0 1 5
axis1 1 2 -4
axis2 2 3 -3
axis1 3 4 5
axis2 3 4 -1
axis1 4 5 -6
axis2 4 5 1
Now, these are my following tasks
1. Print a first column for every two rows that has the same value followed by a string.
2. Match on the... (3 Replies)
Any shortcuts for doing this? I need to cut the column 4 values from File1 and paste them as column4 values of File2, but only for the (first) same number of lines as File1 . All rows in File1 are contained in File2 in the exact same order, so the cut paste should work.
File1 (with header and 3... (4 Replies)
Hi Experts,
Please bear with me, i need help
I am learning AWk and stuck up in one issue.
First point : I want to sum up column value for column 7, 9, 11,13 and column15 if rows in column 5 are duplicates.No action to be taken for rows where value in column 5 is unique.
Second point : For... (1 Reply)
Please help me to get required output for both scenario 1 and scenario 2 and need separate code for both scenario 1 and scenario 2
Scenario 1
i need to do below changes only when column1 is CR and column3 has duplicates rows/values. This inputfile can contain 100 of this duplicated rows of... (1 Reply)
Example:
I have files in below format
file 1:
zxc,133,joe@example.com
cst,222,xyz@example1.com
File 2 Contains:
hxd
hcd
jws
zxc
cst
File 1 has 50000 lines and file 2 has around 30000 lines :
Expected Output has to be :
hxd
hcd
jws (5 Replies)
I have data of an excel files as given below,
file1
org1_1 1 1 2.5 100
org1_2 1 2 5.5 98
org1_3 1 3 7.2 88
file2
org2_1 1 1 2.5 100
org2_2 1 2 5.5 56
org2_3 1 3 7.2 70
I have multiple excel files as above shown.
I have to copy column 1, column 4 and paste into a new excel file as... (26 Replies)
Discussion started by: dineshkumarsrk
26 Replies
LEARN ABOUT LINUX
a2p
A2P(1) Perl Programmers Reference Guide A2P(1)NAME
a2p - Awk to Perl translator
SYNOPSIS
a2p [options] [filename]
DESCRIPTION
A2p takes an awk script specified on the command line (or from standard input) and produces a comparable perl script on the standard
output.
OPTIONS
Options include:
-D<number>
sets debugging flags.
-F<character>
tells a2p that this awk script is always invoked with this -F switch.
-n<fieldlist>
specifies the names of the input fields if input does not have to be split into an array. If you were translating an awk script that
processes the password file, you might say:
a2p -7 -nlogin.password.uid.gid.gcos.shell.home
Any delimiter can be used to separate the field names.
-<number>
causes a2p to assume that input will always have that many fields.
-o tells a2p to use old awk behavior. The only current differences are:
o Old awk always has a line loop, even if there are no line actions, whereas new awk does not.
o In old awk, sprintf is extremely greedy about its arguments. For example, given the statement
print sprintf(some_args), extra_args;
old awk considers extra_args to be arguments to "sprintf"; new awk considers them arguments to "print".
"Considerations"
A2p cannot do as good a job translating as a human would, but it usually does pretty well. There are some areas where you may want to
examine the perl script produced and tweak it some. Here are some of them, in no particular order.
There is an awk idiom of putting int() around a string expression to force numeric interpretation, even though the argument is always
integer anyway. This is generally unneeded in perl, but a2p can't tell if the argument is always going to be integer, so it leaves it in.
You may wish to remove it.
Perl differentiates numeric comparison from string comparison. Awk has one operator for both that decides at run time which comparison to
do. A2p does not try to do a complete job of awk emulation at this point. Instead it guesses which one you want. It's almost always
right, but it can be spoofed. All such guesses are marked with the comment ""#???"". You should go through and check them. You might
want to run at least once with the -w switch to perl, which will warn you if you use == where you should have used eq.
Perl does not attempt to emulate the behavior of awk in which nonexistent array elements spring into existence simply by being referenced.
If somehow you are relying on this mechanism to create null entries for a subsequent for...in, they won't be there in perl.
If a2p makes a split line that assigns to a list of variables that looks like (Fld1, Fld2, Fld3...) you may want to rerun a2p using the -n
option mentioned above. This will let you name the fields throughout the script. If it splits to an array instead, the script is probably
referring to the number of fields somewhere.
The exit statement in awk doesn't necessarily exit; it goes to the END block if there is one. Awk scripts that do contortions within the
END block to bypass the block under such circumstances can be simplified by removing the conditional in the END block and just exiting
directly from the perl script.
Perl has two kinds of array, numerically-indexed and associative. Perl associative arrays are called "hashes". Awk arrays are usually
translated to hashes, but if you happen to know that the index is always going to be numeric you could change the {...} to [...].
Iteration over a hash is done using the keys() function, but iteration over an array is NOT. You might need to modify any loop that
iterates over such an array.
Awk starts by assuming OFMT has the value %.6g. Perl starts by assuming its equivalent, $#, to have the value %.20g. You'll want to set
$# explicitly if you use the default value of OFMT.
Near the top of the line loop will be the split operation that is implicit in the awk script. There are times when you can move this down
past some conditionals that test the entire record so that the split is not done as often.
For aesthetic reasons you may wish to change index variables from being 1-based (awk style) to 0-based (Perl style). Be sure to change all
operations the variable is involved in to match.
Cute comments that say "# Here is a workaround because awk is dumb" are passed through unmodified.
Awk scripts are often embedded in a shell script that pipes stuff into and out of awk. Often the shell script wrapper can be incorporated
into the perl script, since perl can start up pipes into and out of itself, and can do other things that awk can't do by itself.
Scripts that refer to the special variables RSTART and RLENGTH can often be simplified by referring to the variables $`, $& and $', as long
as they are within the scope of the pattern match that sets them.
The produced perl script may have subroutines defined to deal with awk's semantics regarding getline and print. Since a2p usually picks
correctness over efficiency. it is almost always possible to rewrite such code to be more efficient by discarding the semantic sugar.
For efficiency, you may wish to remove the keyword from any return statement that is the last statement executed in a subroutine. A2p
catches the most common case, but doesn't analyze embedded blocks for subtler cases.
ARGV[0] translates to $ARGV0, but ARGV[n] translates to $ARGV[$n-1]. A loop that tries to iterate over ARGV[0] won't find it.
ENVIRONMENT
A2p uses no environment variables.
AUTHOR
Larry Wall <larry@wall.org>
FILES SEE ALSO
perl The perl compiler/interpreter
s2p sed to perl translator
DIAGNOSTICS BUGS
It would be possible to emulate awk's behavior in selecting string versus numeric operations at run time by inspection of the operands, but
it would be gross and inefficient. Besides, a2p almost always guesses right.
Storage for the awk syntax tree is currently static, and can run out.
perl v5.12.4 2011-06-01 A2P(1)