Sponsored Content
Operating Systems Linux Gentoo Data recovery of formatted external HDD Post 302916090 by rajeshz on Sunday 7th of September 2014 01:30:16 AM
Old 09-07-2014
Linux Data recovery of formatted external HDD

accidentally formatted ext3 external hard disk .. im using EAse us tool in windows system to recover the data ... will this works??
if yes ... the another external hard disk have to be formatted in which file system ?
is there any other option ..please help me out
 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Linux

Installing Linux on External HDD

Hi, I want to install LINUX on my laptop. I have a 2GHZ,1GB RAM and HDD is not partitioned. I donot want to touch this HDD and I have external HDD of 200GB. Can I install LINUX on this external HDD?. I would like system to detect linux only when I connect my external hard drive. else system should... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: sureshht
5 Replies

2. Solaris

How to mount External HDD in VMware 6.0

Hi Friends, I am using VMware 6.0 and i want to transfer some files from External HDD so how to mount the Disk, and i am not able to assign any ip to my network card any one can help me how to set ip in VMware. Thanks and Regards, Venky.:b: (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: 1409.venkatesh
0 Replies

3. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

Use external HDD as archive0

Hello UNIX-community, We have an older SCO UNIX-system running PCS3 (an industrial platform) and since a few weeks we are experiencing problems with our archiving software. For about ten years, the system archives data to Magneto-Optical discs (MO-discs) and thus far it has worked fine.... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: V4Friend
3 Replies

4. Filesystems, Disks and Memory

Linux HDD Recovery

Hello, I have my backup disks here because my server got hacked and we didn't like how liquidweb made the things. So we ask them to ship us the disk. They ran photorec and they got lots of .gz files from it. All accounts I would say. But 50% of them the .tar.gz files came corrupt. And is lefting... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: asturmas
2 Replies

5. OS X (Apple)

Installing mac on external hdd?

Hi, As I did not find any specific group for this question, i am putting it here. Can I install Mac OS on an external hard disk? Is this possible or not? I know it is very hard to install mac os on non-mac hardwares. I have a dell inspiron laptop and i want to use mac from external hdd. ... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: sanzee
1 Replies

6. Filesystems, Disks and Memory

Recovery of formatted ext3 partition

Hi! I have a really big problem right now. I (accidently) formatted a ext3 partition with "mkfs.ext3 /dev/sda1". The problem is that I REALLY need some files from there. The partition had a size of about 4GB, after accidently formatting it, I accidently rewrote Grub on it :wall: I hope I didn't... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: al0x
3 Replies

7. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

External HDD

I need to get an external HDD for a SUN server running Solaris 10. The Western Digital that I have will not recognize and when I went looking for drivers WD only has them for MAC and Windows. Is there a External HDD that is known to work with Unix? (24 Replies)
Discussion started by: SIFT3R
24 Replies

8. Red Hat

External HDD Issue

Hello everyone ! I just installed Red Hat 6.4 and when i plug in my external HDD firstly i can see the files and after 5 seconds all dissapears. What causes to this and ways to fix it ? Thanks in advance ! (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: djqbert
1 Replies

9. Red Hat

Suitable External HDD for Linux RHEL

Hi All, I am very new to UNIX systems and need your help. OS: RHEL 5.4(LINUX) 64 bit I need to get a new external 2TB HDD for transferring data from between linux machines. This HDD will not be used in any windows/MAC servers. Only on UNIX systems(linux/solaris) the USB device is to be... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: Bikash Mishra
1 Replies

10. Solaris

Solaris can't detect external HDD on HP server

Hello, Unix users :) Has anyone had this problem when you connect an external hard drive to the server and it is simply not visible with any commands? The server is HP DL380 g8, and OS is: root@...:/# cat /etc/release Oracle Solaris 10 8/11 s10x_u10wos_17b X86 ... (16 Replies)
Discussion started by: Aratai
16 Replies
bup-fsck(1)						      General Commands Manual						       bup-fsck(1)

NAME
bup-fsck - verify or repair a bup repository SYNOPSIS
bup fsck [-r] [-g] [-v] [--quick] [-j jobs] [--par2-ok] [--disable-par2] [filenames...] DESCRIPTION
bup fsck is a tool for validating bup repositories in the same way that git fsck validates git repositories. It can also generate and/or use "recovery blocks" using the par2(1) tool (if you have it installed). This allows you to recover from dam- aged blocks covering up to 5% of your .pack files. In a normal backup system, damaged blocks are less important, because there tends to be enough data duplicated between backup sets that a single damaged backup set is non-critical. In a deduplicating backup system like bup, however, no block is ever stored more than once, even if it is used in every single backup. If that block were to be unrecoverable, all your backup sets would be damaged at once. Thus, it's important to be able to verify the integrity of your backups and recover from disk errors if they occur. WARNING: bup fsck's recovery features are not available unless you have the free par2(1) package installed on your bup server. WARNING: bup fsck obviously cannot recover from a complete disk failure. If your backups are important, you need to carefully consider redundancy (such as using RAID for multi-disk redundancy, or making off-site backups for site redundancy). OPTIONS
-r, --repair attempt to repair any damaged packs using existing recovery blocks. (Requires par2(1).) -g, --generate generate recovery blocks for any packs that don't already have them. (Requires par2(1).) -v, --verbose increase verbosity (can be used more than once). --quick don't run a full git verify-pack on each pack file; instead just check the final checksum. This can cause a significant speedup with no obvious decrease in reliability. However, you may want to avoid this option if you're paranoid. Has no effect on packs that already have recovery information. -j, --jobs=numjobs maximum number of pack verifications to run at a time. The optimal value for this option depends how fast your CPU can verify packs vs. your disk throughput. If you run too many jobs at once, your disk will get saturated by seeking back and forth between files and performance will actually decrease, even if numjobs is less than the number of CPU cores on your system. You can experiment with this option to find the optimal value. --par2-ok immediately return 0 if par2(1) is installed and working, or 1 otherwise. Do not actually check anything. --disable-par2 pretend that par2(1) is not installed, and ignore all recovery blocks. EXAMPLE
# generate recovery blocks for all packs that don't # have them bup fsck -g # generate recovery blocks for a particular pack bup fsck -g ~/.bup/objects/pack/153a1420cb1c8*.pack # check all packs for correctness (can be very slow!) bup fsck # check all packs for correctness and recover any # damaged ones bup fsck -r # check a particular pack for correctness and recover # it if damaged bup fsck -r ~/.bup/objects/pack/153a1420cb1c8*.pack # check if recovery blocks are available on this system if bup fsck --par2-ok; then echo "par2 is ok" fi SEE ALSO
bup-damage(1), fsck(1), git-fsck(1) BUP
Part of the bup(1) suite. AUTHORS
Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@gmail.com>. Bup unknown- bup-fsck(1)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:04 PM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy