Hi all,
I've just been handled the responsibility for a FTP-site. Having no experiens of UNIX at all. And now one of my users needs to have full access to the usr directory and all it's subdirectories, don't know why just trying to do what the boss tells me. The type of UNIX is FreeBSD and the... (4 Replies)
I've been wondering about this one, is there any way to do the following with ZFS ACL's (i.e. "copy" the ACL over to another file)?
getfacl /bla/dir1 | setfacl -f - /bla/dir2
I know about inheritence on dirs, it doesn't work in this scenario I'm working on. Just looking to copy the ACL's.
... (3 Replies)
All,
Does anyone know of a simple way to traverse a file system and collect all ACL's (or ACE's as they are called now)? We use to be able to use getfacl fairly easily for this task but now we are forced to use -v or -V with the 'ls' command to get the extended permissions for a... (1 Reply)
Hi, I want to know what does the "effective" comment means in the output of the getfacl and whether it has to do with the acl mask...
thanks (0 Replies)
Hi All, I've been trying to configure samba on Solaris 10 to allow me to have one share that is open and writable to all users and have the rest of my shares password protected by a generic account.
If I set my security to user, my secured shares work just fine and prompt accordingly, but when... (0 Replies)
Hi Friends,
I went through the ACL threads that were posted in the past but none were matching to my requirement . Hence starting a new thread .
Challenge :
user : a
group : Test1
user: b
group: Test2
Say under user a i create dir /tmp/debug with the privilege of 755 and also... (3 Replies)
we have two Solaris 10 servers with same configuration and settings. We have hard mounted the NFS with the version 4.
In one of the server the newer ACL commands are working fine (chmod and ls -v) whereas in another only posix (getfacl and setfacl alone is working) when we try ls -V in in that... (13 Replies)
Folks,
Solaris 10 issue
When I add a new directory to a path, I only get the "group@" line in the ACL
The parent directory ACL is
drwxrws---+ 12 root teama 12 Jul 18 10:31 .
owner@:rwxp-DaARWc---:------:allow
group@:rwxp-DaARWc--s:fd----:allow
... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: wilberforce
0 Replies
LEARN ABOUT DEBIAN
sticky
sticky(5) Standards, Environments, and Macros sticky(5)NAME
sticky - mark files for special treatment
DESCRIPTION
The sticky bit (file mode bit 01000, see chmod(2)) is used to indicate special treatment of certain files and directories. A directory for
which the sticky bit is set restricts deletion of files it contains. A file in a sticky directory can only be removed or renamed by a user
who has write permission on the directory, and either owns the file, owns the directory, has write permission on the file, or is a privi-
leged user. Setting the sticky bit is useful for directories such as /tmp, which must be publicly writable but should deny users permission
to arbitrarily delete or rename the files of others.
If the sticky bit is set on a regular file and no execute bits are set, the system's page cache will not be used to hold the file's data.
This bit is normally set on swap files of diskless clients so that accesses to these files do not flush more valuable data from the sys-
tem's cache. Moreover, by default such files are treated as swap files, whose inode modification times may not necessarily be correctly
recorded on permanent storage.
Any user may create a sticky directory. See chmod for details about modifying file modes.
SEE ALSO chmod(1), chmod(2), chown(2), mkdir(2), rename(2), unlink(2)BUGS
The mkdir(2) function will not create a directory with the sticky bit set.
SunOS 5.10 1 Aug 2002 sticky(5)