Sponsored Content
The Lounge What is on Your Mind? Quest for the most useless command Post 302882120 by colemar on Saturday 4th of January 2014 11:44:41 AM
Old 01-04-2014
Question Quest for the most useless command

I wrote by accident:
Code:
cd .

and even hit ENTER.

Then I realized this is probably the most useless command that you can imagine. Yes, perhaps it could assert that there is still a working filesystem, but I am not sure about it.

What do you think?
Can you think of any more useless commands? Smilie
 

6 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

a quest regarding the path?

Hi mates, A newbe in UNIX world. how can i add a specific path to my default unix path. ie i want to add a directory let is say /abdul to the path and whenever i log in unix should recognize it. it is mostly importnant when i use the cc command to compile my c programs ...and i have to use ./cc... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: abdul
2 Replies

2. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

useless command

Hi, I came across with this line "set -x" in the beginning of a script, but i can't find one logic reason for this... should be something else after, i think.... anyone can help? tanx (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: cabresto
2 Replies

3. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

IBM Quest Market-Basket Synthetic Data Generator

Hi All, I am trying to install the IBM data set generator. I have to use the Solaris to use this tool. The following link is supposed to tell the steps on how to use the IBM tool on the Solaris server. IBM Quest Market-Basket Synthetic Data Generator Unfortunately, I don't understand what is... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: loollool
2 Replies

4. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

Quest on NFS with 1 Server & 2 Clients

Hello; I work now with a team which has based her "applications" on the following schema: 1 NFS client C1 (linux redhat 5) writes a file fic.dat on a NFS SERVER S (RH 5) Another NFS client C2 is waiting for the same file fic.dat (on NFS server S1), and, when "fic.dat" appears, then makes... (8 Replies)
Discussion started by: SolarMax
8 Replies

5. Shell Programming and Scripting

Useless Cat usage

cat ~/text.xt | while read line do echo ${line} | perl -pe 's/(\d+)/localtime($1)/e' done how can i efficiently re-code the above? also, no matter how i run this, i'm not getting the current/correct date. the contents of the "text.xt" looks like this: SERVICES... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: SkySmart
2 Replies

6. What is on Your Mind?

Fighting useless use of cat

Fighting UUOC cat filename|while read line; do ... with sed 's/cat *\(*\) *|/<\1/g' I found that while loops are converted to <filename while read line; do ... Syntax error! Why syntax error? It would perfectly make sense. Further, read the article how-would-you-like-your-loops-served-today... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: MadeInGermany
5 Replies
bup-margin(1)						      General Commands Manual						     bup-margin(1)

NAME
bup-margin - figure out your deduplication safety margin SYNOPSIS
bup margin [options...] DESCRIPTION
bup margin iterates through all objects in your bup repository, calculating the largest number of prefix bits shared between any two entries. This number, n, identifies the longest subset of SHA-1 you could use and still encounter a collision between your object ids. For example, one system that was tested had a collection of 11 million objects (70 GB), and bup margin returned 45. That means a 46-bit hash would be sufficient to avoid all collisions among that set of objects; each object in that repository could be uniquely identified by its first 46 bits. The number of bits needed seems to increase by about 1 or 2 for every doubling of the number of objects. Since SHA-1 hashes have 160 bits, that leaves 115 bits of margin. Of course, because SHA-1 hashes are essentially random, it's theoretically possible to use many more bits with far fewer objects. If you're paranoid about the possibility of SHA-1 collisions, you can monitor your repository by running bup margin occasionally to see if you're getting dangerously close to 160 bits. OPTIONS
--predict Guess the offset into each index file where a particular object will appear, and report the maximum deviation of the correct answer from the guess. This is potentially useful for tuning an interpolation search algorithm. --ignore-midx don't use .midx files, use only .idx files. This is only really useful when used with --predict. EXAMPLE
$ bup margin Reading indexes: 100.00% (1612581/1612581), done. 40 40 matching prefix bits 1.94 bits per doubling 120 bits (61.86 doublings) remaining 4.19338e+18 times larger is possible Everyone on earth could have 625878182 data sets like yours, all in one repository, and we would expect 1 object collision. $ bup margin --predict PackIdxList: using 1 index. Reading indexes: 100.00% (1612581/1612581), done. 915 of 1612581 (0.057%) SEE ALSO
bup-midx(1), bup-save(1) BUP
Part of the bup(1) suite. AUTHORS
Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@gmail.com>. Bup unknown- bup-margin(1)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:11 AM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy