Sponsored Content
Top Forums UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers FILESYSTEM not FULL, PERMISSION is 777, but cant write to the server Post 302880486 by Scott on Thursday 19th of December 2013 07:57:36 PM
Old 12-19-2013
Your question is far too vague.

Can you be more specific about what you're trying to write to? What exactly are you doing to get the 'permission denied' error? i.e. what do you mean by "filesystem"? A new file? An existing file? What permissions is 777?
 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Filesystem Full

I noticed that whenever something is printed from my workstation, the available disk space in the /dev/dsk/c0t0d0s0 decreases considerably. Hence, after using my workstation for sometime, I encounter an error message: "Filesystem Full" that prevents me from printing any further. Is there a way to... (16 Replies)
Discussion started by: ilak1008
16 Replies

2. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

filesystem full

my root filesystem is eventually full "/dev/rdsk/c1d0s0" as a result i cannot boot to the operating system, i booted into the fail safe mode to check the space using df -h command i discover that it is eventually full. Also to my amazement i found that i cannot see the filesystem which mounted on... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: seyiisq
1 Replies

3. Red Hat

/ filesystem getting full

Hi All, How do I increase the root filesystem? It's getting full. / 90% Here's the break down, below 232 dev 5624 tmp *6764 bin 16860 root *19680 sbin *20436 lib64 28329 boot *47992 etc 150012 var *254540 lib 651708 home *2445044 usr (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: itik
5 Replies

4. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

filesystem is full

Hello everybody, a very basic question. Inspite of me deleting huge files in a filesystem(AIX 5.3) in oracle folder, the filesystem when i check using df -k still shows 100% full. Does that mean there is a process still pointing to the files which i deleted. how do i work around this. Thanks!... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: karthikosu
3 Replies

5. Cybersecurity

can another user 777 and existing 777 dirctory?

User usrA creates dirA directory and runs chmod 777 on the directory. Can usrB issue another 777 on dirA? It appears the answer is no even if the usrA and usrB are part of the same group. I know this is a rare scenario but I just ran across it and found out that usrB receives an error when... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: zlek131
4 Replies

6. Solaris

/usr/bin has been changed with 777 permission

Hello Guruz, Relay bad condition :mad: Some has changed the permission to 777 recursively for /usr/bin directory by mistake. Now all the permission looks to be 777 on /usr/bin Hence I am so many system related errors as 1 show below. When I am trying to change the password, I am getting... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: bullz26
5 Replies

7. Shell Programming and Scripting

set permission on file to 777

Here is the sample code I'm trying to execute. I see that the permission on the file is set to 755 always I want to change it to 777. Please help me with this. code : #!/usr/bin/perl use File::Path qw(make_path remove_tree); my $path = "2010/sam"; make_path($path,{mode=>0777}); ... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: hansini
1 Replies

8. Shell Programming and Scripting

get file permission in 777 format

Hi All, Is there any unix(solaris) command to get file permissions in 777 format or do we need to write some script for it? (7 Replies)
Discussion started by: rishav
7 Replies

9. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

How to create a file with 777 permission.?

Hi Guys, I want to know is there any method to create a file having 777 permission. I am aware of umask, since it is only giving max. 666 permission for files this is not fulfilling my needs. Thanks in advance ---------- Post updated at 12:49 AM ---------- Previous update was at 12:31... (10 Replies)
Discussion started by: sanoop
10 Replies

10. Solaris

NIS Server Filesystem is full

Hey Guys, I need your help. My NIS server filesystem is 100%, the NIS is running under solaris 10. I am affraid if the server stops, it wont come up again. Please help. (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: andrevicente
4 Replies
ACCESS(2)						     Linux Programmer's Manual							 ACCESS(2)

NAME
access - check user's permissions for a file SYNOPSIS
#include <unistd.h> int access(const char *pathname, int mode); DESCRIPTION
access checks whether the process would be allowed to read, write or test for existence of the file (or other file system object) whose name is pathname. If pathname is a symbolic link permissions of the file referred to by this symbolic link are tested. mode is a mask consisting of one or more of R_OK, W_OK, X_OK and F_OK. R_OK, W_OK and X_OK request checking whether the file exists and has read, write and execute permissions, respectively. F_OK just requests checking for the existence of the file. The tests depend on the permissions of the directories occurring in the path to the file, as given in pathname, and on the permissions of directories and files referred to by symbolic links encountered on the way. The check is done with the process's real uid and gid, rather than with the effective ids as is done when actually attempting an operation. This is to allow set-UID programs to easily determine the invoking user's authority. Only access bits are checked, not the file type or contents. Therefore, if a directory is found to be "writable," it probably means that files can be created in the directory, and not that the directory can be written as a file. Similarly, a DOS file may be found to be "exe- cutable," but the execve(2) call will still fail. If the process has appropriate privileges, an implementation may indicate success for X_OK even if none of the execute file permission bits are set. RETURN VALUE
On success (all requested permissions granted), zero is returned. On error (at least one bit in mode asked for a permission that is denied, or some other error occurred), -1 is returned, and errno is set appropriately. ERRORS
access shall fail if: EACCES The requested access would be denied to the file or search permission is denied to one of the directories in pathname. ELOOP Too many symbolic links were encountered in resolving pathname. ENAMETOOLONG pathname is too long. ENOENT A directory component in pathname would have been accessible but does not exist or was a dangling symbolic link. ENOTDIR A component used as a directory in pathname is not, in fact, a directory. EROFS Write permission was requested for a file on a read-only filesystem. access may fail if: EFAULT pathname points outside your accessible address space. EINVAL mode was incorrectly specified. EIO An I/O error occurred. ENOMEM Insufficient kernel memory was available. ETXTBSY Write access was requested to an executable which is being executed. RESTRICTIONS
access returns an error if any of the access types in the requested call fails, even if other types might be successful. access may not work correctly on NFS file systems with UID mapping enabled, because UID mapping is done on the server and hidden from the client, which checks permissions. Using access to check if a user is authorized to e.g. open a file before actually doing so using open(2) creates a security hole, because the user might exploit the short time interval between checking and opening the file to manipulate it. CONFORMING TO
SVID, AT&T, POSIX, X/OPEN, BSD 4.3 SEE ALSO
stat(2), open(2), chmod(2), chown(2), setuid(2), setgid(2) Linux 2002-04-23 ACCESS(2)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:08 PM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy