Sponsored Content
Top Forums UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers Why my find return not expected? Post 302877293 by Scott on Friday 29th of November 2013 01:08:32 PM
Old 11-29-2013
It's performing the exec on sbin, not both directories.
Code:
find / \( -name bin -o -name sbin \) -exec ls {} \;

But by introducing ls, it is very different from what you asked originally
 

9 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Find command not working as expected

I have a script with a find command using xargs to copy the files found to another directory. The find command is finding the appropriate file, but it's not copying. I've checked permissions, and those are all O.K., so I'm not sure what I'm missing. Any help is greatly appreciated. This is... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: mpflug
2 Replies

2. Shell Programming and Scripting

Find cmd not working as expected

Hi, i wan to search the file starting with Admin into the directory Output. I am running below command: find /appl/Output -name "Admin*" -prune but this command is going into the sub directories present under output. I do not want to search under sub directories. Any help will be highly... (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: Vishal123
6 Replies

3. Shell Programming and Scripting

Find command return type

Hi all does find command return anything if the file to be searched is not found? Like if I search from a file in a dir does it return false or null if the file is not found? Please suggests. (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: Veenak15
3 Replies

4. Shell Programming and Scripting

Find: return code check

Hi, I've a find command like, find /abcd/efgh -name "xxxx" 2> /dev/null > file1 what would be the condition to check if this returns none(means if the file "xxxx" is not present) ???? I tried checking with $? and it returns 72 to me but even the file is present also it returns... (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: skcvasanth
6 Replies

5. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Why do these 2 find commands return different results?

Hi, I am using the korn shell on Solaris box. Why does the following 2 commands return different results? This command returns no results (I already used this command to create a list of files which I moved to an archive directory) find ????10??_*.dat -type f -mtime +91 However this... (15 Replies)
Discussion started by: stumpy1
15 Replies

6. Shell Programming and Scripting

return value not coming as expected

Hi, We are using a shell script which is called from COBOL program. Here the program works fine till we are using MicroFocus(MF) COBOL 4 and UNIX AIX 5.3. Recently we have upgraded to MicroFocus(MF) COBOL 5.1 but same AIX version. now the shell script not working as expected. The shell... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: vensk27
5 Replies

7. Shell Programming and Scripting

basename not working as expected from find -exec

I have the following files in a directory > ls -1 /tmp/test/dir/ file with spaces 1.ogg file with spaces 2.oggI am running the following to echo the filenames but alter the file extension on the files to .mp3 instead of .ogg ( I am going to run ffmpeg against the files ultimately, but keeping... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: jelloir
2 Replies

8. Shell Programming and Scripting

Result of Catching Return Value from Sub_script.sh to Main_script.sh is not as Expected

Main_script.sh #! /bin/sh ./Sub_script.sh rc=$? echo "Return code from Sub_script.sh : $rc" if ; then echo "$rc = 991" echo "" exit 1 elif ; then echo "$rc = 992" echo "" exit 1 elif ; then echo "$rc = 0" echo "" exit 1 fi (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: duddukuri
2 Replies

9. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

Manipulate files with find and fuser not working as expected on SunOs

Greetings, For housekeeping, I use the following command: find /some/path -type f -name "*log*" ! -exec fuser -s "{}" 2>/dev/null \; -exec ls -lh {} \; It finds all log files not currently in use by a process and manipulates them. This command always works on linux and redhat machines,... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: dampio
2 Replies
GZEXE(1)						      General Commands Manual							  GZEXE(1)

NAME
gzexe - compress executable files in place SYNOPSIS
gzexe name ... DESCRIPTION
The gzexe utility allows you to compress executables in place and have them automatically uncompress and execute when you run them (at a penalty in performance). For example if you execute ``gzexe /usr/bin/gdb'' it will create the following two files: -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1026675 Jun 7 13:53 /usr/bin/gdb -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 2304524 May 30 13:02 /usr/bin/gdb~ /usr/bin/gdb~ is the original file and /usr/bin/gdb is the self-uncompressing executable file. You can remove /usr/bin/gdb~ once you are sure that /usr/bin/gdb works properly. This utility is most useful on systems with very small disks. OPTIONS
-d Decompress the given executables instead of compressing them. SEE ALSO
gzip(1), znew(1), zmore(1), zcmp(1), zforce(1) CAVEATS
The compressed executable is a shell script. This may create some security holes. In particular, the compressed executable relies on the PATH environment variable to find gzip and some standard utilities (basename, chmod, ln, mkdir, mktemp, rm, sleep, and tail). BUGS
gzexe attempts to retain the original file attributes on the compressed executable, but you may have to fix them manually in some cases, using chmod or chown. GZEXE(1)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:52 PM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy