09-17-2013
The Poweredge 2500 is a Pentium 3. The 2600 is a Pentium 4.
You should be at Unixware 7.1.1 with maintenance pack 2 installed in order to just do a backup and restore.
Do you have a RAID system?
Do both machines have the same disk controller.
If you do an image copy, you will not be able to change the disk size.
10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting
1. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users
I am trying to view the hardware specifications through ssh (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: kfir
4 Replies
2. SCO
Hi All,
I want to check memory details and other hardware details of my SCO machine. can someone please share the command to do that?
Thanks,
Am (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: am_yadav
2 Replies
3. Red Hat
Hi All,
URGENT - Please help me form a scipt for this:
I need the LATEST file from a dir on REMOTE machine to be SCP'd to a dir on local machine. (and I need to execute this from local server)
I know that the below cmd is used to find the LATEST file from a dir. But this command is not... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: me_ub
3 Replies
4. Debian
Hello!
I have a debian system running on a VPS with virtuozzo as the host.
I wish to move this system to another hosting provider, but they are running KVM/QEMU, and sadly, KVM/QEMU can't handle (or convert) the virtuozzo images. (And even if they could, the current provider wouldn't give me... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: noratx
1 Replies
5. Shell Programming and Scripting
I need a shell script to copy files frm a linux machine to a windows machine using SCP. The files keeps changing day-to-day. I have to copy the latest file to the windows machine frm the linux machine.
for example :In Linux, On July 20, the file name will be 20.txt and it should be copied to... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: nithin6034
3 Replies
6. Shell Programming and Scripting
Hi All..
Am new to Unix!!
Am creating a shell script in which a scenario is like i have transfer the output file from unix machine (Server) to local directory (Windows xp).
And also i have to transfer the input file from the local directory to Unix machine (Server)
Any help from you... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: vidhyaS
1 Replies
7. Red Hat
Hi,
I am just confused about these three things which are shown in the output of uname command. I am running RH lINUX 9.0 on hardware having Intel HT CPU. My uname shows
uname -p i686 (processor)
uname -m i686 (machine)
uname -i i386 (hardware)
I was about to ... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: dextergenious
1 Replies
8. Linux
Hi,
Could you please help me with the below issue..
I'm running RHEL6 OS on both server (192.168.0.10) and client machines (192.168.0.1).
I'm trying to connect to server from the client machine using ftp service.
I have installed vsftpd daemon on both the machines.
I'm getting... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: raosr020
4 Replies
9. Red Hat
I want to SSH to 192.168.1.15 Server from my machine, my ip was 192.168.1.99
Source Destination was UP, with IP 192.168.1.15.
This is LAN Network there are 30 Machine's Connected to the network and working fine, I'm Playing around the local machine's because I need to apply the same rules in... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: babinlonston
2 Replies
10. Shell Programming and Scripting
Team,
Presently i am running a script from my local box(i.e jumpbox) to all the remote machines.Basically fetching basic queries like pwd,mkdir,touch etc and i am able to successfully fetch it from my local machine.But when i want to check certain database related queries like the dbstat... (20 Replies)
Discussion started by: whizkidash
20 Replies
LEARN ABOUT DEBIAN
bup-fsck
bup-fsck(1) General Commands Manual bup-fsck(1)
NAME
bup-fsck - verify or repair a bup repository
SYNOPSIS
bup fsck [-r] [-g] [-v] [--quick] [-j jobs] [--par2-ok] [--disable-par2] [filenames...]
DESCRIPTION
bup fsck is a tool for validating bup repositories in the same way that git fsck validates git repositories.
It can also generate and/or use "recovery blocks" using the par2(1) tool (if you have it installed). This allows you to recover from dam-
aged blocks covering up to 5% of your .pack files.
In a normal backup system, damaged blocks are less important, because there tends to be enough data duplicated between backup sets that a
single damaged backup set is non-critical. In a deduplicating backup system like bup, however, no block is ever stored more than once,
even if it is used in every single backup. If that block were to be unrecoverable, all your backup sets would be damaged at once. Thus,
it's important to be able to verify the integrity of your backups and recover from disk errors if they occur.
WARNING: bup fsck's recovery features are not available unless you have the free par2(1) package installed on your bup server.
WARNING: bup fsck obviously cannot recover from a complete disk failure. If your backups are important, you need to carefully consider
redundancy (such as using RAID for multi-disk redundancy, or making off-site backups for site redundancy).
OPTIONS
-r, --repair
attempt to repair any damaged packs using existing recovery blocks. (Requires par2(1).)
-g, --generate
generate recovery blocks for any packs that don't already have them. (Requires par2(1).)
-v, --verbose
increase verbosity (can be used more than once).
--quick
don't run a full git verify-pack on each pack file; instead just check the final checksum. This can cause a significant speedup
with no obvious decrease in reliability. However, you may want to avoid this option if you're paranoid. Has no effect on packs
that already have recovery information.
-j, --jobs=numjobs
maximum number of pack verifications to run at a time. The optimal value for this option depends how fast your CPU can verify packs
vs. your disk throughput. If you run too many jobs at once, your disk will get saturated by seeking back and forth between files
and performance will actually decrease, even if numjobs is less than the number of CPU cores on your system. You can experiment
with this option to find the optimal value.
--par2-ok
immediately return 0 if par2(1) is installed and working, or 1 otherwise. Do not actually check anything.
--disable-par2
pretend that par2(1) is not installed, and ignore all recovery blocks.
EXAMPLE
# generate recovery blocks for all packs that don't
# have them
bup fsck -g
# generate recovery blocks for a particular pack
bup fsck -g ~/.bup/objects/pack/153a1420cb1c8*.pack
# check all packs for correctness (can be very slow!)
bup fsck
# check all packs for correctness and recover any
# damaged ones
bup fsck -r
# check a particular pack for correctness and recover
# it if damaged
bup fsck -r ~/.bup/objects/pack/153a1420cb1c8*.pack
# check if recovery blocks are available on this system
if bup fsck --par2-ok; then
echo "par2 is ok"
fi
SEE ALSO
bup-damage(1), fsck(1), git-fsck(1)
BUP
Part of the bup(1) suite.
AUTHORS
Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@gmail.com>.
Bup unknown- bup-fsck(1)